It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Legman
a reply to: Bedlam
I think it will be one the intangible things that explains what gravity is.
Im not a scientist. This is just my thought.
originally posted by: Parthin
This would account for the mass that our telescopes cannot see.
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: Parthin
This would account for the mass that our telescopes cannot see.
I'm not much of a "science man", but to me it would seem that if we can't see it...
...it probably doesn't exist. At least that's what scientists say about everything else they can't observe and quantify.
But that would mean their equations are completely wrong and they really have no idea what they're talking about.
And we certainly can't have that now, can we?
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: Bedlam
But I agree, you're not much of a science man, or you'd understand a bit more of the process.
What "process"?
Making things up?
originally posted by: Bedlam
Sure. You see, that's all science is. Made up stuff to fool you. We actually have a God chained down in a cave in New Mexico, it's where all the stuff you're using REALLY comes from. That computer? Pfft! No one actually knows how they work. They're created by the God.
originally posted by: NthOther
You wouldn't be trying to maliciously characterize me as a "science-denier", would you? Completely sidetracking the discussion into an ad hominem attack via sarcasm because you don't like the fact that I don't agree with you?
Surely not.
Anyway. I'll leave you guys to your consensus dark matter discussion with this:
Are you picking and choosing what you will believe without evidence? That's really the only point I was trying to make with my initial post.
originally posted by: NthOther
You wouldn't be trying to maliciously characterize me as a "science-denier", would you? Completely sidetracking the discussion into an ad hominem attack via sarcasm because you don't like the fact that I don't agree with you?