It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There are lots of good ideas. Here are some of the dark matter candidates from a dark matter expert:
originally posted by: Toolman18
Come on. That's just a ridiculous thing to say. Dark matter can be anything we want it to be right now. I've yet to hear a good idea about what it is. But soon I believe we will know
It's almost certainly more than one thing. As bedlam suggested, some is probably neutrinos. One type of dark matter is what you're standing on, the Earth, and other planets. Brown dwarf stars can only be seen when they are relatively lose in cosmic terms, so we don't really know how many brown dwarfs there are and how much of the dark matter they make up but it's probably at least some.
originally posted by: ErosA433
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Nail on head there Arbitrageur, there are different forms of dark matter, and much close examination of space has been performed and lots of different theories with different shares of matter content. They point as you say to this unobserved fraction being about 75-80% of the matter content of the universe.
As for what it is, there are as many theories as you can think of, and an interesting interplay between what the theories are and how they behave. There is a great image that shows this...
That is not my picture, I grabbed it from a blog after I saw it presented by a theorist in a conference.... To say that dark matter theory is closed minded is to deny that theory didn't put all its eggs in one basket but actually many baskets hehe
But what if this dark matter is ordinary matter?
The theory of Big Bang nucleosynthesis, which predicts the observed abundance of the chemical elements, predicts that baryonic matter accounts for around 4–5 percent of the critical density of the universe. In contrast, evidence from large-scale structure and other observations indicates that the total matter density is about 30% of the critical density. Wikipedia
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: Parthin
This would account for the mass that our telescopes cannot see.
I'm not much of a "science man", but to me it would seem that if we can't see it...
...it probably doesn't exist. At least that's what scientists say about everything else they can't observe and quantify.
But that would mean their equations are completely wrong and they really have no idea what they're talking about.
And we certainly can't have that now, can we?
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: Bedlam
But I agree, you're not much of a science man, or you'd understand a bit more of the process.
What "process"?
Making things up?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Reminds me of this:
I'm not much of a "science man", but to me it would seem that if we can't see it...
...it probably doesn't exist.
originally posted by: NthOther
...But that would mean their equations are completely wrong and they really have no idea what they're talking about.
And we certainly can't have that now, can we?
originally posted by: Parthin
Photons have no mass.
a reply to: Toolman18
Saying all objects are detectable doesn't mean we can detect them.