It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
from letter of Jaime Maussan.
Mr. Jose Antonio Caravaca:
With regard to your question about whether it was true that Messrs. Don Schmitt and Tom Carey were thinking of declaring that the images of so-called Roswell Slides correspond to a Mummy, I want to assure you that has no basis.Messrs. Schmitt and Carey are convinced of the authenticity of the evidence and what they signify is presented a Being who has no human characteristics.
We consider that so far there have been explained scientifically dozens of anomalies in the Self. With regard to Mr Adam Dew is not making a documentary to discredit this case and as we do not doubt his honesty in the investigation of the origin of such evidence.
Therefore we consider that it is the same disinformation operation that has been developed to try to make the public believe that it is the image of a Mummy, without having presented only circumstantial evidence and elements; such as the same placard, so like well the possible exhibition of this being in a museum.
We are very interested in finding that body if possible, or if exist more pictures that allow broaden our research.
On the other hand I would like to comment that the participation of Mr. Anthony Bragalia were just merely try to find a mummy that had the same characteristics of the images. According to Mr. Bragalia investigated more than 400 different cases and could not find him.
Resulting truly suspect that Mr. Bragalia have found the alleged mummy, just hours after they were released the images even more suspicious is that now Mr. Bragalia be declared the most important investigator of the case by those who have expressed openly against.
In fact I do not know Mr. Bragalia, I've never talked to him and therefore lacks the moral authority to be considered the most important investigator of this case.
Clearly we are in the midst of a disinformation operation whose sole intention is to sow doubt about a case that has drawn the attention of public opinion.
I strongly reject all the accusations against me. Throughout my career I have always maintained a conduct of honesty. So far on any occasion they were presented evidence to the contrary, only doubts and speculations.
Thank you for your attention and interest in the event Bewitness definitely the best place in the history of this phenomenon."
Regarding the placard, we quickly determined that
(1) its content would be key to interpreting the slides; and
(2) we could not read it.
- So, we sent copies to Dr. David Rudiak and Dr. Donald Burleson. Both had done exemplary work in trying to decipher the so-called "Ramey Memo" - a situation very similar to placard issue here. Both responded to us that the placard was "unreadable."
- Through a contact, we had the Photo Interpretation Unit at the Pentagon in Washington, DC take a look at it. They said that it was "unreadable."
- A copy went to a company in New York now requesting anonymity that conducted the analysis on a major historical artifact. That company's response to us was that the placard was "unreadable."
- Another copy went to the people at Adobe, Inc. (manufacturers of Adobe Photoshop and the Adobe Reader on your computer). Their response? "It's unreadable."
- A copy also was also sent to aggressive Roswell researcher Anthony Bragalia who also reported to me that it was "unreadable." (Bragalia has now aggressively joined in with our critics).
Our own computer guy says that he applied the "SmartDeblur" software to the placard over a year ago without any success. He did so again this week to an enhanced, sharper version of the placard with the latest edition of the "SmartDeBlur" program, again without success.
Now, we are told (not asked) to believe that a cast of characters, one of whom has clearly become unhinged and was himself party to a known UFO body hoax some years ago, has used the same program (SmartDeBlur) on a distorted, "screen-grab" of the placard and is somehow able to "read" it when all of the above, some of whom had much more sophisticated equipment and techniques at their disposal, could not. I ask you, what's wrong with this picture?
Air Force Lt. Col. Richard French
"The first one was shot down by an experimental U.S. airplane that was flying out of White Sands, N.M., and it shot what was effectively an electronic pulse-type weapon that disabled and took away all the controls of the UFO, and that's why it crashed."
Comment from discussion on Art Campbell and Chuck Wade findings in Sn Agustin, NM
The story fits the site of the crash of the third element of the Roswell crash, the crash at the "Plains of San Agustin". In that story an Archeologist stumbles on the site with a summer field class, photographs and gets to inspecting the craft and occupants before the Army shows up and takes control of the site.