It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
as posted by MaskedAvatar
In there (somewhere) you will find what you seek about the specific methods that the FBI has called into question as applied to military intelligence. If the FBI has been unable to or has chosen not to cite the documents because the documents have already served to create the practices of military interrogation that the FBI has taken issue with, then I suspect the average ATS member will not be securing those documents. It takes somebody with the intelligence connections and without the overriding tendency to obfuscate and to apologize for the Bush administration's incompetence and corruption, to do that!
Originally posted by Seekerof
Till then, said "presidential executive order," as alledged by the ACLU FBI-E-Mail and/or "memo," is an 'illusion' and one that again continues to amount to a speculative unconfirmed allegation.
as posted by Kidfinger
About this stupid EO. An EO is ANY given order by the president. Verbal or written. Just because there is no written documents doesnt mean he didnt verbally issue the order. You are arguing symantics when you need to be looking at the true morals of the conservative party.
The Federal Register Act of 1935 effectively required that both executive orders and proclamations to be published in the Register.
--snip--
Regulations governing the preparation, presentation, filing, and publication of executive orders and proclamations are prescribed in E.O. 11030, as amended.
quote:
SEC. 3. Routing and certification of originals and copies. (a) If the order or proclamation as signed by the President, the original and two copies thereof shall be forwarded to the Director of the Office of the Federal Register for publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER. Provided, that prior to such forwarding the Seal of the United States shall be affixed to the originals of proclamations to the extent required by statute or Executive order.
(b) The Office of the Federal Register shall cause to be placed upon the copies of all Executive orders and proclamations forwarded as provided in subsection (a) of this section the following notation, to be signed by the Director or by some person authorized by him to sign such notation: "Certified to be a true copy of the original."
Originally posted by Seekerof
Still dribbling Thorfinn?
You see, you and others can claim that executive orders can be hidden, etc., but in truth, for an executive order to be considered 'valid', it must registered with the Office of the Federal Register. They are in sequencial order.
Again, a list, listed by Subject, indicates no such executive order implemented by President Bush suggesting that he authorized the use of controversial methods. I mean geez, that is what this topic is all about isn't it? TOP STORY: ACLU : Bush Authorized Torture.
This is not a matter of justifying Bush, this is a matter of whether he authorized such uses.
seekerof
[edit on 21-12-2004 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by Seekerof
JOHNSmith,
This topic is not about Rumsfield, FBI, or the CIA authorizations or uses of controversial methods. It revolves around the claims of the ACLU that the President alledgedly authorized such uses by way of "a/an executive order," k?
seekerof
Originally posted by marg6043
My, my, anything for justification of our Mr. president in the white house, you will follow the devil yourself as long as it has bush face and tells is in the name of the lord and the good of the world
[edit on 23-12-2004 by marg6043]
as posted by JOHNSmith
The federal registry is not required to release all records...
Other functions are to appraise and make reports to Congress regarding records proposed for disposal by Government agencies that do not, or that will not after the lapse of a specified time, appear to have sufficient administrative, legal, research, or other value to warrant their continued preservation by the Government; and to receive and publish the texts and codes of all Presidential proclamations and Executive orders and of rules and regulations issued by Federal agencies that have general applicability and legal effect.
Executive orders are official documents, numbered consecutively, through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government.
The text of Executive orders appears in the daily Federal Register as each Executive order is signed by the President and received by the Office of the Federal Register. The text of Executive orders beginning with Executive Order 7316 of March 13, 1936, also appears in the sequential editions of Title 3 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
NOTE: The total number of Executive orders issued for each administration includes number-and-letter designated orders, such as 9577-A, 9616-A, etc
--snip--
These tables contain information about Executive orders beginning with those signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. They are arranged according to Presidential administration and year of signature.
These tables are compiled and maintained by Editors of the Office of the Federal Register and include the following information:
Executive order number;
Date of signing by the President;
Federal Register volume, page number, and issue date;
Title;
Amendments (if any); and
Current status (where applicable)
Fourth, although the president is required to publish executive orders in the Register, he has a loophole in that only a number may be used to register those orders that pertain to sensitive matters, such as national security. Therefore, he may record �secret� orders under the guise of �sensitive matters.�
Originally posted by Mahree
1. OK. can you tell me where you are getting your information that President Bush has authorized torture? Please give me a link.
2. The article for this thread does not prove that the President authorized torture. And, while we are about it, how do we know that the email is authentic?
3. How could President Bush prove that he did not write an Executive Order? There is no Executive Order. Therefore he can't prove he didn't do it? This whole thing doesn't make sense.
4. You and others say there doesn't have to be an executive order. That President Bush does this in secret. How do you know? Is it what you would do so that is why you accuse the President of doing it?
5. If you do have a link to prove that the President has authorized torture, please post it. I really want to know the truth. And right now it sounds like Seekerof is the only one who makes any sense. :shk:
THANKS TO a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and other human rights groups, thousands of pages of government documents released this month have confirmed some of the painful truths about the abuse of foreign detainees by the U.S. military and the CIA -- truths the Bush administration implacably has refused to acknowledge.
Originally posted by Thorfinn Skullsplitter
So who exactly should be held responble? There is a saying to the effect that the one in charge is the one to blame.
Originally posted by SeekerofYeah, even as a Bush supporter, I will again grant you that. But regardless of the proofs against Rumsfield, I will assert that other than the mysterious "executive order," I am skeptical of the presidents involvement.
seekerof
[edit on 23-12-2004 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by Seekerof
I would suppose that this article is expressly naming Rumsfield, of the Bush Administration. Is does beg one to consider that if Rumsfield gave authorization, then who gave Rumsfield the authorization or did he act entirely independent?
Yeah, even as a Bush supporter, I will again grant you that. But regardless of the proofs against Rumsfield, I will assert that other than the mysterious "executive order," I am skeptical of the presidents involvement, but hey, you guys know me...
Perhaps I give to much benefit of the doubt to the President... But in this expressed case, it will require more than has been alledged for me to believe that the President authorized such uses, IMHO.
seekerof
[edit on 23-12-2004 by Seekerof]