It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is considered a blanket statement, for it does not incorporate motivation for the stabbing (ie: was it self-defense or was just for the hell of it).
In the applied case of your comment, "justification" is relative.
www.cnn.com...
Originally posted by Rifleman
DELETE MY GOD DAMN ACCOUNT NOW!
Originally posted by marg6043
Exactly we have the right to make sure that our country leaders are doing the right thing for the good of our nation.
So we should not expect the government to do all the decisions without asking us the people of this nation if we want it or not.
Realitive ZeroDeep....
Did the ACLU also obtain from those "5,000" documents the classification and name for that alledged "presidential executive order"?
Thought not.
As such, be sure that among all that "moral relativism" that you so eloquently adhere to, that you keep condemning a man that of yet is to be identified with the authorization of controversial mthods and measures to obtain information, k?
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Everything on the planet does not revolve around the judiciary.
Does the US constitution apply to the entire world? You keep making statments about "rights" that only exist in the US and a few British colonies. "Held without charges"? Can you spell WAR? Can you understand the concept? Everything on the planet does not revolve around the judiciary.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Actually the US constitution was shreaded in 1803 after Marbry v Madison. Look it up and you will see why.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Perhaps you don't realize it Marg, but that quote could also be said by a president as this "Ask not what I can do for you, ask me what you can do for your country." Kennedy was telling Americans in this quote what to do, and what was right, which i actually agree with the quote...but it goes against what you were saying, that no president should be telling the people what to do....
Originally posted by Muaddib
....AND you're perfectly willing to go thru this again....Just think of what you're saying about Castros Cuba, and what you're saying here.
Originally posted by marg6043
..........because they live in an oppressive government, they can't speak outloud like you are doing in here, they can't demonstrate against the government "in any manner" if they do they are sent to jail, they never are able to find a job, and they are harrassed by .
Its Ironic that you should defend the actions here while singing the Cuban Blues....
There ultiminate goal is to turn this nation into a socialistic society.
as posted by MaskedAvatar
Not all presidential orders are made public and not all of them appear in the sequentially numbered Executive Orders series
The Federal Register Act of 1935 effectively required that both executive orders and proclamations to be published in the Register.
--snip--
Regulations governing the preparation, presentation, filing, and publication of executive orders and proclamations are prescribed in E.O. 11030, as amended.
SEC. 3. Routing and certification of originals and copies. (a) If the order or proclamation as signed by the President, the original and two copies thereof shall be forwarded to the Director of the Office of the Federal Register for publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER. Provided, that prior to such forwarding the Seal of the United States shall be affixed to the originals of proclamations to the extent required by statute or Executive order.
(b) The Office of the Federal Register shall cause to be placed upon the copies of all Executive orders and proclamations forwarded as provided in subsection (a) of this section the following notation, to be signed by the Director or by some person authorized by him to sign such notation: "Certified to be a true copy of the original."
Originally posted by Seekerof
Link to the source that indicates this, because apparently, your link does not mention this.
As for my own postulation and proofs to what I have already asserted, for which you just tried to overrule, is: