Hillary Rodham Clinton enters White House race; Democrat seeks to be first female president.

a reply to: Urantia1111

I would love a female president, especially like Iceland's! But Hilary, shes a warhawk, she was soooo happy Gadaffi got sodomized with a knife that ended his life. I'm done with wars and conflicts so I say oh HELLLLLLl no to Hilary!

a reply to: spy66

Yes and will then admit it.

originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
a reply to: Swills

If Hil.Rod.Clinton becomes the President of the USA,then may the gods help us all-I mean all of us earthlings..

It will confirm my theory that planet Earth has become the parallel universe,upside down world,where all is backwards and wrong.

Anyone get the feeling the 2016 election result has already been predetermined?

Humans-we are doing it wrong.

I have no doubt she'll be sitting in the White House with first lady Bill Clinton in 2016.
She'll also lead the US to WW3.

It's presumptuous to crown Hillary or Jeb as the choice this early in the running.

Hillary comes with an 80 car freight train full of baggage that'll weigh her down or run her over in the end - IMHO enough that only the most zealous will support her - as it is she's not exactly getting the kind of mesmerized swooning support BHO had.

Jeb is considered milqtoast III by most conservatives I'm familiar with and I'm predicting someone a bit younger and more ardent will win that nomination despite the lefts wishes for another McCain/Romney type to run their candidate against.

I have no issue with a woman as president, just not that corrupt woman. Warren might as well be running socialist party instead of DNC, Fiorina blew up HP and can't be serious.


If the DNC fails to hold a serious primary and nominates Hillary on automatic then they are going to face results that are unpredictable with Hillary.

The debates will be the tell, Hillary came across as snide and somewhat petty last time, her issue is no matter plaster on smile, the eyes told different story - if looks could kill, hers are lethal - that plus temper.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: aethertek

You forgot gay commie socialist

LMAO Thank You

K~

I plan on treating Hillary the same as Palin was treated.

I must admit, it will be fun to some degree.

a reply to: beezzer

Got that right,

Hypocrisy will be an abundant theme as the groups that were loudly silent on Palins treatment will vociferously come out in Hillarys defense at the slightest transgression.

And the childish BS continues. They win.

a reply to: Urantia1111

Why are you not getting the fact that the USA is not comparable to those who really count! I am in no way saying that the US is the BEST country in the entire world...in fact, I feel the US government actively works to do untold psychologicall, financial and direct harm...intention harm, to "we the people".

But, I do not sit on a secretive board that is the BIS, and they have made determination that the USA has the #1 position in the global central banking system they oversee and manipulate to create whatever outcome they wish!

That includes who is elected President and who is not.

For these reasons, other countries are not on the same level as the USA. But again, saying this does not reflect my personal views, but that of the BIS.

a reply to: Boeing777

Perhaps she will appoint Monica Lewinsky Secretary of State?

originally posted by: Nickn3
a reply to: Boeing777

Perhaps she will appoint Monica Lewinsky Secretary of State?

With our improving relations with Cuba, Bill will have easy access to quality cigars, so he'd be really excited if that happened.

originally posted by: intrepid
And the childish BS continues. They win.

In any type of warfare, if only one side plays by the rules, then that side usually loses.

Why not embrace every dirty trick, every media-hype that progressives use.

we can laugh, scoff, sneer with derision at politics as usual.

The laws that they are passing, the freedoms they are eroding are having a direct impact on all of us.

"They" don't fight fair. "They" don't play by the rules.

Why not level the playing field?

Everything in life is perspectival. Hillary Clinton’s run for president is no different than anything therefore one can look at this from different perspectives.

One perspective, that of the standard political issue orientated race, is the reality that she is running against a very negative GOP party of anti-human, pro elitist rich people party, with not one issue that favors poor or middle-class people in their platform.

Therefore Hillary, being a standard liberal, is better than any of the GOP candidates.


Though from the globalist conspiracy theorist perspective Hillary is a nightmare, as any of the GOP candidates are as well, since all of them plus Hillary are puppet candidates of the elite whose sinister plan to destroy the middle class of the Western world is in full bloom.

The plan is simple and already has worked in Europe but the final straw is to elect an anti-human GOP based government in the US that will destroy unions, eradicate civil and human rights issues, create backward economic austerity( such as is in Europe) and further the elitist globalist plot to bring the would to a virtual return to serfdom.


So the bottom line is that whoever wins the ordinary American is again screwed

Whether the neo-con and neo-liberal Hillary or any of the anti-human GOP candidates

Wait, wut?

She's a female?

a reply to: Swills

The GOP would have to nominate a particular nasty individual for me to vote for Hillary. Unfortunately, I can pretty much count on them doing just that.

I'm really really really really really hoping our choice isn't going to be down to Hillary and another Mittens or McCain clone.

Sanders, Warren... those two are acceptable to me. Hillary has a lot of things going for her that I admire but far too many things that scream "establishment politics". I'm pretty sure she'll just keep us going the intended direction and not shake any boats. Which is exactly what both sides want apparently.

It isn't Amercans that should fear her, it is the rest of the world.

We are the ones that suffer mostly.

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: intrepid
And the childish BS continues. They win.

In any type of warfare, if only one side plays by the rules, then that side usually loses.

Why not embrace every dirty trick, every media-hype that progressives use.

we can laugh, scoff, sneer with derision at politics as usual.

The laws that they are passing, the freedoms they are eroding are having a direct impact on all of us.

"They" don't fight fair. "They" don't play by the rules.

Why not level the playing field?

That appeals to me as a voter. You forget that there is seldom a huge move to the left or right. It's the centrists that win elections and "We're just doing what they are doing..." doesn't get many votes.

originally posted by: Nickn3
a reply to: Boeing777

Perhaps she will appoint Monica Lewinsky Secretary of State?

ethics and transparency czar would be good.

a reply to: intrepid

You can play at being lofty and above all the dross.

I'm looking at 2016 as a trip to The Thunderdome.

It will most likely be Hillary against Bush, unless something weird happens

There is an outside chance that Paul may get it but I doubt it, he’s too flaky and the Military, Industrial, Intelligence, Homeland Security complex ain't playing around with no isolationism THAT WOULD CAUSE THEM TO LOOSE THE BOONDAGLE OF DEFENSE RELATED MONEY

The GOP will again nominate a surface middle of the road candidate such as Bush, as they did in 2008 and 2012.