It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pfishy
a reply to: Anyafaj
Well, considering that the donor body would have entirely different DNA, no, it wouldn't have the disease. But his head still would. Not that it matters, though. The technology and surgical technique don't exist to even repair the severed spinal cord of a paraplegic. There's no way this surgeon is going to produce a healthy patient from 2 corpses. The donor body will never come to life, due to the lack of successful nerve impulses from the transplanted brain. And I highly doubt the surgeon will be able to perform the transplant quickly enough to avoid brain death, even if the body came back to life.
originally posted by: Volund
Yes. By undergoing chemo and destroying all the patients immune system bone marrow... the new bone marrow is taken from a doner with the genetic immunity to HIV. The new cells from the doner replicate and replace the original immune system thereby making the patient immune to HIV. The patient afterwards is immune. This is a proven fact and the patient is referred to as the Berlin Patient [off the top of my head]. Big Pharma does not like this [I assume]. Insurance companies do not like this because the procedure is about $150,000.
Now... as for the full body transplant... this opens a big can of worms because once we master the technique (and no doubt eventually we will) people with the most money will be farming out [or cloning] bodies and the medical black market of Kosovo will look like nothing.
Imagine this....
originally posted by: pfishy
a reply to: hutch622
Well, since the immune cells of the body are mostly generated in the body, it would reject the head.
originally posted by: pfishy
a reply to: muse7
The body donor would be a corpse. Only the patient brain death would matter. But it would happen.
originally posted by: pfishy
a reply to: violet
Perhaps the soul is just the transubstantiated portion of the consciousness/personality. Or vise versa.
originally posted by: pfishy
a reply to: big_BHOY
The problem with stem cells is the rejection factor. Who's stem cells would they use? Either the patient or the donor cells would reject the connection with the other.
originally posted by: charlyv
Just how would it be possible to correctly align all of the nerve trunks in the spinal column of the head to the spinal column of the new body?
originally posted by: bullcat
It's his life, frankly I think he's crazy but that's up to him.
If it does succeed, he will be forever known as Frankenstein and a freak. Again, that is his call.
Most body part transfers are hampered by one thing, GENETIC COMPATIBILITY.
Bloody type matching is only part of it, there is the genetic side, the body will fight itself to death treating it as a foreign part.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: charlyv
Just how would it be possible to correctly align all of the nerve trunks in the spinal column of the head to the spinal column of the new body?
There have been amazing advances in neurosurgery but I am not sure this is yet possible.
I do remember reading about this over at either Humanity+ hplusmagazine.com... or Singularity University singularityhub.com...
Asked by newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda on the cost of the first surgery, he replied: 'Do you love football? I hate it. Nonetheless, you have slackers who meaninglessly stroll around the pitch and are paid $20-30 million a year.
'I need $15 million. It's the price for happiness and health for a lot of people. But sponsors prefer spending money on healthy boneheads who can't kick a ball.'
Asked if such surgery could be used for 'elderly billionaires to get a young body', he claimed he had interest from tycoons seeking to extend their lives.
'You bet - there are a few funds working on prolonging life expectancy, and they are well-funded.
'These people came to me and said, "here is the money, but we want our participation to stay secret".
'However, I want everything to be transparent. Doing the surgery in a secret place on a secret island is not my cup of tea, to be honest.'
'I am prepared for any nicknames, because it sounds cool and will help to sell more newspapers.
'But I am very conservative when it comes to funding.
'When Bill Gates or Dmitry Itskov (a Russian millionaire supporting the research in artificial intelligence) fund my project, I'll come to the cameras with the receipt and say, "this person supported my initiative".'
He went on: 'I know what I'm for and am prepared for it. I already have an entire army of enemies.
'But even if I fail with the project, it'll be a lot easier for those who carry on after me.'
He admitted that 'the final goal is immortality' and brushed aside objections from churches.
'I'm not a Catholic and not even a Christian. But I respect other points of view. And I will listen to what the Orthodox church has to say. But this church has one point of view, and the Catholic - another.'
He claims a senior Catholic figure has said he sees no objections to the surgery, he said, adding: 'In Asia and China, the religious authorities also haven't shown any discontent about that. I don't think the religious aspect will play a huge role.