Judges shocked by first time seeing video of WTC 7 collapse in Denmark court, March 2015

The Question is "Cui Bono?"
source: wikispooks.com...

Israel did 9/11 (Israeli Mossad) by Dr. Alan Sabrosky
source: www.youtube.com...

Project for the New American Century
source: www.youtube.com...
source: en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: rebelv
And then of course, the weekend before 9/11, all power was turned
off for the towers, which had never happened before, no one was
allowed to come into their offices on that weekend because they
were doing "security upgrades", which I guess included shutting off
backup power systems of course, so all security cameras went dark.

Where is your evidence power was turned off for the whole building? That silly story has already been shown to be made up in this thread, try reading the thread before posting nonsense!

a reply to: hellobruce

I told him to be prepared...lol

a reply to: rossacus

Actually, I have demolished stuff before. And, for a 47 story building, it would have taken a minimum of five months. Five months in which the inside is completely stripped to gain access to all the necessary structural supports. Five months in which the tenants would not be able to be in the building.

a reply to: rossacus

He is going to offer up one of two people as proof. And their stories were examined long ago and found to be highly inaccurate. Not to mention, then we are back to a crew of Supermen who completely stripped two 110 story buildings, wired them for demolition, and then replaced all the furniture so that no one noticed...in less than 14 hours.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: rossacus

Actually, I have demolished stuff before. And, for a 47 story building, it would have taken a minimum of five months. Five months in which the inside is completely stripped to gain access to all the necessary structural supports. Five months in which the tenants would not be able to be in the building.

Unless they use the James Bond method, stick egg timers to the wall, then the whole building blows up!

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: rossacus

Rigging a 47 story for demolition without any tenant noticing? Nope. Not happening. You either do not know what it takes to rig a building like that, or you have too much confidence in the US Government. I was an employee of said government for 26 years. It cannot start a successful orgy in a room full of horny people....there is no way it could plan and carry out what you think.

Right, so you believe just random fires could bring a building down in free fall? Too difficult to do that with rigged explosive or thermite, but can happen purely happenstance with random fires...

And why would it be so hard to carry out? There are people in and out of those buildings constantly, day and night. No tenant is going to know one way or another what is going on.

The aftermath of potential use of thermite:

WTC Molten Steel

a reply to: Blackmarketeer


Massive damage and fire. Not a "random" fire as you posted. Besides, by the afternoon, the fires in WTC 7 were ANYTHING but "random".

Then the second part, why would it be so hard to carry out.....because people would still notice a crew drilling holes in the walls of their offices and then sticking demolition charges in them.

originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: Shamrock6

You didn't even read the point. Wise up. His point was how could anyone plant these things without anyone seeing them. My point was they do it outside office hours. Pathetic response

Ahhh yes they did it outside office hours. Guess all those $10 an hour rent a cops that sit in these buildings all night were all in on it. And all those offices that have people in them before 9 and after 5, and indeed overnight, never noticed a thing.

Ignorant, unintelligent, clueless about what an office complex is really like response.

a reply to: Blackmarketeer

You realize you posted a page that pretty much rules out thermite right? Thermite, burns and then goes out. It does not provide heat for days. The only thing providing heat for the molten metals (not STEEL) that were found, were the underground fires that were burning. Again.....not an indication of thermite.

originally posted by: noeltrotsky
It was built to extra high standards as it held the cities new emergency facilities as well as secret government agencies.

This is patently false.

Aside from the transfer trusses (required because the foundation was only ever designed for a 25 story building) on the 5th-7th floors, the remainder of the building was traditional tube design.

I grew up working for demolition cies here in the UK. Ogdens of Otley and I worked for my brother in law Billy Reidy and a couple of other local demolition cies in Yorkshire. From the age of 15 I used to wall walk around the top of buildings taking old buildings down brick by brick. I also used oxy/acetylene to cut and strip mills and other buildings /Towers /lanky boilers. I was a Top man working high and after the lads had stripped the building I`d climb up and drop the floors one by one. Then I joined the Legion Etrange and because of my demolition experience I always ended up in a demolition unit were I was trained to use plastics in demolition. I served in east west north and central Africa. Did the Beirut boogy in the early 80s and was at a place called shatilla in the leb. My first 2 yrs were in Djibouti, then I returned to France (Corsica) were I was in the 4th cie of the 2nd REP. Specialised in behind battle demolition sabotage. 4th cie was made up of snipers and demolition. I was demolition. So yes I do have experience in demolition and explosives I did that for almost 4 yrs on a daily basis in several war zones.
911? When I saw those buildings come down I thought to myself they fell rather quickly not only that but they fell into their foot prints, I could`nt have done a better job myself, using explosives. Building 7 went down like a dream job. I watched all the news clips and listened to the explanations of what happened. The only conspiracy in my mind was the official story. The man in a cave and his gang must have had a bit of devine help to have pulled that off. I dont care what any one says and you can trot out all the expert witnesses that you want but I aint having it. Just like the gulf of Tonkin or the bay of pigs or which ever other false flag that was pulled to get the USA into a war. I would`nt trust the controlled media or news or the govts experts as they are just puppets doing what they are told for the cabal that is pulling their strings. IMO it was a false flag specially with that bush fellow in the white house.

a reply to: cardinalfan0596

Then this page addresses a lot of the conspiracies around thermite use:

FAQ #14: What was the Molten Metal Seen Pouring Out of the South Tower Minutes Before its Collapse — Steel and Iron, or Aluminum and/or Lead?

Although NIST has failed to fulfill its duty, a team of nine scientists has investigated samples of dust from the collapsed Twin Towers and has documented the discovery of microscopic-but-intact remnants of nano-thermite. This type of energetic material can be easily tailored to be either pyrotechnic or explosive.

Figure 9. Dr. Niels Harrit leads an international team of scientists that documents the finding of red-gray nano-thermite chips in four independently-collected WTC dust samples. This material ignites and forms the iron-rich spheres that were so abundant in the dust.

Chemist Dr. Niels Harrit leads the team of scientists, which includes Dr. Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan. Their investigation resulted in the 2009 peer-reviewed paper, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe." Harrit et al identify on ly one of the thermitic materials that must have been used, but they do not attempt to ascertain if the cutting charges were composed of this particular material. Chemical engineer Mark Basile has already independently verified the conclusion of their paper. His study is still being completed and will hopefully be published by the end of 2014.

Harrit is the scientist who used the libel lawsuit to finally have his day in court from the OP.

originally posted by: illuminnaughty
but they fell into their foot prints,

Why repeat that untrue story? How do you think WTC 7 and the other buildings in the WTC complex got severely damaged? None of the collapsing buildings on 9/11 fell into their own footprint.

originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
Harrit is the scientist who used the libel lawsuit to finally have his day in court from the OP.

A lawsuit that he lost as he is a court certified idiot. No thermite was found at the WTC.

a reply to: illuminnaughty

Unfortunately for your view, none of the buildings fell into their footprints. They damaged damn near every building in the vicinity.

Yes sure they didnt fall exactly down into their foot prints but close enough. I aint going to get into a big debate about this I am almost 60 yrs old and have been around the block. I know what I saw and it was not what I was told that I saw.

originally posted by: SanitySearcher
a reply to: Blackmarketeer

If anyone knows the work involved and equipment needed to set up a real demolition to fall so perfectly...in a building full of staff in various businesses only emptied at 9am the day of the WTC attack.......!!!!!

Well, no more needs said, because I don't want to expose the idiots.

Of course all that work was perfectly carried out by unknown caused fires and unknown extremely minute bits of damage to the building!!!!

Which idiots do you think would be exposed ?

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: SanitySearcher
a reply to: Blackmarketeer

If anyone knows the work involved and equipment needed to set up a real demolition to fall so perfectly...in a building full of staff in various businesses only emptied at 9am the day of the WTC attack.......!!!!!

Well, no more needs said, because I don't want to expose the idiots.

Of course all that work was perfectly carried out by unknown caused fires and unknown extremely minute bits of damage to the building!!!!

Which idiots do you think would be exposed ?

Was the 20 floor long gash/hole in the side of the building one of the "extremely minute" bits of damage? Or did that come from something else?

And yes, that's a legit question (im the one who's getting into the WTC 7 stuff for the first time, be kind) and not a troll. That hole didn't seem minute to me, but was it caused by something other than falling debris? And is there definitive evidence of it, or just conjecture?