Judges shocked by first time seeing video of WTC 7 collapse in Denmark court, March 2015

originally posted by: illuminnaughty
I grew up working for demolition cies here in the UK. Ogdens of Otley and I worked for my brother in law Billy Reidy and a couple of other local demolition cies in Yorkshire. From the age of 15 I used to wall walk around the top of buildings taking old buildings down brick by brick. I also used oxy/acetylene to cut and strip mills and other buildings /Towers /lanky boilers. I was a Top man working high and after the lads had stripped the building I`d climb up and drop the floors one by one. Then I joined the Legion Etrange and because of my demolition experience I always ended up in a demolition unit were I was trained to use plastics in demolition. I served in east west north and central Africa. Did the Beirut boogy in the early 80s and was at a place called shatilla in the leb. My first 2 yrs were in Djibouti, then I returned to France (Corsica) were I was in the 4th cie of the 2nd REP. Specialised in behind battle demolition sabotage. 4th cie was made up of snipers and demolition. I was demolition. So yes I do have experience in demolition and explosives I did that for almost 4 yrs on a daily basis in several war zones.
911? When I saw those buildings come down I thought to myself they fell rather quickly not only that but they fell into their foot prints, I could`nt have done a better job myself, using explosives. Building 7 went down like a dream job. I watched all the news clips and listened to the explanations of what happened. The only conspiracy in my mind was the official story. The man in a cave and his gang must have had a bit of devine help to have pulled that off. I dont care what any one says and you can trot out all the expert witnesses that you want but I aint having it. Just like the gulf of Tonkin or the bay of pigs or which ever other false flag that was pulled to get the USA into a war. I would`nt trust the controlled media or news or the govts experts as they are just puppets doing what they are told for the cabal that is pulling their strings. IMO it was a false flag specially with that bush fellow in the white house.

Excellent post!

And to the others there's your proof. The buildings themselves.

I would like to see some scientists try to make a high rise like
that collapse by crashing airplanes into them (they were going
to destroy anyway)

I'd like to see scientists start some spot fires in a building
and see if the whole thing collapses.

I'd like to see them remote control an airplane of similar
size and crash it into a field and see if resembles anything
like Shankville?

So, in other words, because somebody says 'oh that was debunked'
it doesn't mean it was debunked.

George Bush said that he saw the first plane hit the first building
on the day of 911, he was even asked , "Are you sure you mean
The FIRST plane hitting the FIRST building" and he said , "Yes"
and reiterated himself.

Or has that been debunked as well, he never said that?

I'd like to see some real evidence, that it is possible for
these things to happen because I don't think it is.
It's never happened before or since.

So, to the others, show me some evidence!

Great Post.

Rebel 5

originally posted by: rebelv

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: rossacus

Rigging a 47 story for demolition without any tenant noticing? Nope. Not happening. You either do not know what it takes to rig a building like that, or you have too much confidence in the US Government. I was an employee of said government for 26 years. It cannot start a successful orgy in a room full of horny people....there is no way it could plan and carry out what you think.

Actually, tenants had been complaining of all kinds of floors, of loud
noises of all kinds for weeks before 9/11.

Some folks interviewed who survived or didn't go to work that day,
seemed pretty much in agreement that they heard drilling sounds,
sounds of heavy equipment, etc...

Some people said it sounded like they were doing street construction
inside the building on many different floors.

And then of course, the weekend before 9/11, all power was turned
off for the towers, which had never happened before, no one was
allowed to come into their offices on that weekend because they
were doing "security upgrades", which I guess included shutting off
backup power systems of course, so all security cameras went dark.

Rebel 5

Here is one witness for you.

a reply to: jimmyx

the truth of building 7 has been out there for a long time. you have to have people that are powerful enough in government, and that have the courage to stand up to the real or imagined fear of reprisal or worse.

Building 7

Evidently it was still on fire because most of the fireman were dead. Weird huh?

V

originally posted by: Variable
a reply to: jimmyx

the truth of building 7 has been out there for a long time. you have to have people that are powerful enough in government, and that have the courage to stand up to the real or imagined fear of reprisal or worse.

Building 7

Evidently it was still on fire because most of the fireman were dead. Weird huh?

V

What's funny about that, is reading the comments section of that article and reading the "best rated comments"...

Well let's put it this way, the best rated comment with 1 and half thousand likes started with "This is the stupidest article of dis-information that I've ever seen"

Can we please show those same judges the video of the BBC reporter saying that building seven had collapsed when it was clearly visible still standing intact in the background?

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: babybunnies
Can we please show those same judges the video of the BBC reporter saying that building seven had collapsed when it was clearly visible still standing intact in the background?

www.youtube.com...

Or what about the firefighters knowing that it was going to "blow up" before it did?, strange choice of words for a steel structured building that was on fire.

a reply to: Debunkology

Or what about the firefighters knowing that it was going to "blow up" before it did?,

Do you think when a 47 story building falls someone might call it blowing up. Did it looked like it blew up? looked like it fell down. If it blew up wouldn't there be a crater? I think if it was really going to blow up they would have been running not causally walking away. It is pretty sad there is still so much talk about this. Did you hear any explosions? I didn't, did anyone track down all those people being filmed where they say it was actually blown up? You could hear it falling apart in the video. You guys are grasping at straws.

V

originally posted by: Variable
a reply to: Debunkology

Or what about the firefighters knowing that it was going to "blow up" before it did?,

Do you think when a 47 story building falls someone might call it blowing up. Did it looked like it blew up? looked like it fell down. If it blew up wouldn't there be a crater? I think if it was really going to blow up they would have been running not causally walking away. It is pretty sad there is still so much talk about this. Did you hear any explosions? I didn't, did anyone track down all those people being filmed where they say it was actually blown up? You could hear it falling apart in the video. You guys are grasping at straws.

V

Your the one who is grasping at straws, and you are in the minority. Just like that Daily Mail article you picked up. But you failed to read the comments section, where the vast majority support the view that Building 7 was a controlled demolition. This is because it is so friggin obvious.

Daily Mail readers!! Patriotic, anti immigrant, anti-Islamic types are the ones who read that scummy publication, and yet even their readership know the score. That how ridiculous it is. That's how much YOU are clutching at straws.

At six seconds of that videos it sounds like an explosion to me.

a reply to: Debunkology

Here is another interview with Scott Forbes.

georgewashington.blogspot.com...


To date, not a single, solitary, soul has come out to add any info or even corroborate him. And, in the interview on the youtube video, he states it was 36 hours. Then, in the GW interview he says 26 hours.

On this page..

www.911myths.com...

..are scans of tickets showing that visitors were being allowed to go to the observation deck of a building that is supposedly powered down.

Mr. Forbes story has been highly suspicious for a number of reasons...changing times...when pressed on details he evades direct answers and as I already stated no one has come forward to corroborate it. And, its just ONE building. No one has come forward to speak of similar events in the other Tower or in WTC 7. But, to honest, it does not matter for one simple reason. Twenty six hours does not even come CLOSE to the time needed to wire a building for demolition.

a reply to: Debunkology

Your the one who is grasping at straws, and you are in the minority

No sir, I think everyone knows your thinking on the matter is in the minority. You have a small group of very vocal people keeping this stuff alive. Most people people have long since listened and given no credence to these theories. You are simply deluding yourself if you think otherwise.

V

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Debunkology

Here is another interview with Scott Forbes.

georgewashington.blogspot.com...


To date, not a single, solitary, soul has come out to add any info or even corroborate him. And, in the interview on the youtube video, he states it was 36 hours. Then, in the GW interview he says 26 hours.

Really? Not a solitary soul?



Interestingly this guy also says between 24 and 36 hours! He's not the only one, I'll see if I can find another video of someone else.

All the videos of him titled in english have been taken down by youtube.

a reply to: Debunkology

Ah, we have one. Who's story has differences from Mr. Forbes.

And that still does not solve the problem of it not being anywhere near enough time to rig a demolition. Nor does it address why tourists were allowed to come into the building when, according to Mr. Corbett, it is entirely powered down. Unless of course you want to stipulate that him and Mr. Forbes can only answer for their specific floors.

.....then...there is the problem of the demolition rig surviving the high speed impact of an airliner and still managing to function.....

those pesky facts......

originally posted by: Variable
a reply to: Debunkology

Your the one who is grasping at straws, and you are in the minority

No sir, I think everyone knows your thinking on the matter is in the minority. You have a small group of very vocal people keeping this stuff alive. Most people people have long since listened and given no credence to these theories. You are simply deluding yourself if you think otherwise.

V

LOL, why don't you go back to that daily mail article you love and read all the people shoot it down. The problem with 9/11 is that there is a massive silent majority who have suspicion. It's the vocal minority like you and bruceboy who seem to have too much time on their hands to argue against the laws of physics.

a reply to: Debunkology

You mean a massive silent majority that have only read what is on conspiracy sites and does not list all the facts about WTC 7 that day?

That majority?

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Debunkology

Ah, we have one. Who's story has differences from Mr. Forbes.

And that still does not solve the problem of it not being anywhere near enough time to rig a demolition. Nor does it address why tourists were allowed to come into the building when, according to Mr. Corbett, it is entirely powered down. Unless of course you want to stipulate that him and Mr. Forbes can only answer for their specific floors.

.....then...there is the problem of the demolition rig surviving the high speed impact of an airliner and still managing to function.....

those pesky facts......

No. The only fact there is that you just stated your "opinion". Big difference!!

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Debunkology

You mean a massive silent majority that have only read what is on conspiracy sites and does not list all the facts about WTC 7 that day?

That majority?

"Conspiracy sites"

What, you mean like firefighters for 9/11 truth? pilots for 9/11 truth? families for 9/11 truth? architects and engineers for 9/11 truth?

You mean those "conspiracy" sites who don't actually come up with a conspiracy of their own but actually DEBUNK the "official conspiracy theory" and simply want an independent REAL investigation?

You mean those "conspiracy" sites?

a reply to: Debunkology

Umm...no. It took twenty four DAYS to wire a nine story building for demolition...

"In 24 days, CDI's 12 person loading crew placed 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on 9 levels of the structure. Over 36,000 ft. of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay devices were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system. As the implosion required the detonation of a total of 2,728 lb. of explosives, CDI implemented 36 “primary delays" and an additional 216 “micro-delays" in the implosion initiation sequence in an attempt to keep detonation overpressure to a minimum."

www.controlled-demolition.com...

................ and you think that a 110 story building can be wired in less than 26 hours.

a reply to: Debunkology

Yep. Those conspiracy sites. Because that is what they are.

The Seattle Kook that started "Firefighters for truth" isn't welcome in most FDNY stations.

Richard Gage from A/E 911 "Truth" has been caught lying more times than I can remember....but is making a nice living at it...

Rob Balsamo of P4T used to hang out here....till enough REAL pilots embarrassed him that he left in shame.

I am surprised you did not bring up Patriots for 9/11 Truth...who are just as misinformed/lying as the rest.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Debunkology

Umm...no. It took twenty four DAYS to wire a nine story building for demolition...

"In 24 days, CDI's 12 person loading crew placed 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on 9 levels of the structure. Over 36,000 ft. of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay devices were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system. As the implosion required the detonation of a total of 2,728 lb. of explosives, CDI implemented 36 “primary delays" and an additional 216 “micro-delays" in the implosion initiation sequence in an attempt to keep detonation overpressure to a minimum."

www.controlled-demolition.com...

................ and you think that a 110 story building can be wired in less than 26 hours.

Did I say anything about 12 people taking 36 hours to take down a building by conventional means?

No I didn't.

Just because you pick up an article about 12 people taking 21 days means absolutely nothing and does not contribute to this thread.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Debunkology

Yep. Those conspiracy sites. Because that is what they are.

The Seattle Kook that started "Firefighters for truth" isn't welcome in most FDNY stations.

Richard Gage from A/E 911 "Truth" has been caught lying more times than I can remember....but is making a nice living at it...

Rob Balsamo of P4T used to hang out here....till enough REAL pilots embarrassed him that he left in shame.

I am surprised you did not bring up Patriots for 9/11 Truth...who are just as misinformed/lying as the rest.

These are real proffesionals, 2,334 REAL architects and engineers signed the petition for a new investigation. People who know a hell of a lot about buildngs. Yet you have the audacity to call them liers just because they want a new independent investigation? Unbelievable.