It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Telos
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Really? Well,you could have fooled me... you're the one who opened your post by saying...
I'm not trying to fool anyone and actually I take offense of your "tone". I don't understand what's your scope in this thread, dealing with the elephant in the room or picking on words that I already explained (which I don't have to) that were part of the article and not my opinion. Learn rules of commentary analysis in which the replies can start with a copied phrase from the original material.
I'm done commenting about this.
TORONTO - Despite efforts by the Liberal government to distance itself from suggestions that disgraced bureaucrat Benjamin Levin had a hand in crafting the sex-ed curriculum, there’s ample evidence he put his fingerprint on what Ontario children learn in the classroom.
Levin — a former deputy education minister who is expected to plead guilty to child porn-related charges Tuesday — repeatedly highlighted his role as overseeing curriculum issues.
In a 2009 newsletter, the then-deputy minister said he was “responsible for ... everything that they do” and to “implement” the “new” approach.
In an interview with OISE’s winter 2009 newsletter, Levin said: “I was the deputy minister of education. In that role, I was the chief civil servant. I was responsible for the operation of the Ministry of Education and everything that they do; I was brought in to implement the new education policy.”
The controversial parts has students as young as six learning about “consent” who by 12 are given an introduction to same-sex relations.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
especially in the wake of an election where we could proudly declare it was a non-issue.
Some Canadians are, and too often they'd like to drag the rest of us down with them.
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: Telos
Kids at 12 are Going to know about same sex relationships, they should be discussed along.side heterosexual relationships. Is Canada quite conservative?
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: Strawberry88
You seem to have a great fear that sexual predators are going to target your child at school, it's much more likely to be a member of your family that targets your kids.
originally posted by: Strawberry88
originally posted by: Annee
Someone prove to me where a child pornographer wrote this curriculum.
And I don't mean a "sideways" association of circumstances.
Why do children aged 5 need the added confusion of ALL the sexual options they have? Society is not complicated enough as it is or what? WHEN they ask, ? . . .
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: Telos
The question is, did he bring any of his criminal behavior to the curriculum? Show me that he did, please? If not, then you are simply using the whole issue as a handy diversion from the fact that you don't like the curriculum changes.
Kathleen Wynne and Minister Liz Sandals have also promised that teaching of "enthusiastic sexual consent" will be weaved throughout the sex-ed curriculum, beginning in grade 1. It appears that it will become progressively more explicit in each grade so that children can "see what consent looks like", althought the government has not provided details on how this will be presented to 6 year olds....
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: Telos
The question is, did he bring any of his criminal behavior to the curriculum? Show me that he did, please? If not, then you are simply using the whole issue as a handy diversion from the fact that you don't like the curriculum changes.
originally posted by: Telos
a reply to: Strawberry88
That's the elephant in the room that somehow is being ignored by some.