It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ontarians oppose the new graphic sex-ed program for schools

page: 1
19
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+10 more 
posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:22 AM
link   
The new sex-ed program proposed by the liberal government of Ontario and its primer, the lesbian Kathleen Wynne has caused uproar and enraged parents who consider unacceptable the introduction of gender ideology, homosexuality and same-sex marriage in the earliest grades, to its graphic treatment of topics like masturbation and oral and anal sex. The program consistently pushes a morally and physically dangerous sexual agenda. The introduction of the program caused also a rally where hundreds of ontarians at Queen's Park on February 24, 2015 raised their voices against it.


While the Ontario Liberal government under lesbian Premier Kathleen Wynne would have parents believe its newly unveiled sex-ed program is an unbiased presentation of fact, a detailed look at what kids in grades 1-8 are expected to learn reveals something entirely different.

Passing the baton of the 1960s sexual revolt to today’s up-and-coming generations of youngsters, the 2015 Health and Physical Education program states in its earliest pages that sexual health “is more than simply teaching young people about the anatomy and physiology of reproduction,” but includes the relatively recent inventions of “sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression” as well as “gender roles and expectations.”


www.lifesitenews.com...

The link above contains a grade by grade break down of the program that is being introduced. The irony is that the primary architect of this program is Dr. Benjamin Levin , who was arrested in 2013 for making child pornography. So go figure.



I for once as a parent I'm so enraged and mad that my kids are about to go through this total madness, perversion and loss of moral values. My 6 year old should learn how to spell book, bike or paper and pen, not penis, vagina, anal sex or lesbianism. In what kind of crazy world we live? There are no more boundaries and the most unnatural and deprived deviations are being introduced as the norm and the way of nature. How can a kid which can't still spell properly the word library has to be faced with the above? Why should my kids at that age learn about gay and lesbian and anal sex or masturbation and not let the parents decide when to have the talk and give their own creatures the knowledge at the moment they decide is the proper one? I'm so sick and disgusted with all this that I'm thinking the best solution is to home school my kids. Follow the video. It really raises some great concerns and also read the material in the link. And if you're canadian, please sign in the petition. Canadians shouldn't be lead by perverts.




posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:23 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Telos

What does the sexuality of the Premier have to do with it?

I don't see anything wrong with teaching the kids the facts. In fact, more education is what is needed to combat teenage pregnancy and the spread of STDs.

I can see how this would bother someone who wishes to continue their own judgements and hateful treatment of LGBT people.



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:36 AM
link   
Just judging by the article, it doesn't seem all that graphic to me personally.



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Telos

I feel those sexual (supposed education) programs should not be in schools at all. I feel that parents should tell their children about those things in life...when the children are ready. Every child is different...and their timing and curiosity about such things is different too. Not every child is ready to hear and learn about such things at such young ages.

I get this awful feeling that there may be a (hidden pedofile agenda) for teaching such things to children at such a young age.

I am very frightened for and worried about the children of today.



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: caladonea
I get this awful feeling that there may be a (hidden pedofile agenda) for teaching such things to children at such a young age.


Are you serious??? The education includes information on how to avoid sexual predators! I wish I had had that when I was a kid...
edit on 3/15/2015 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:46 AM
link   
Unfortunately for children, not all parents are mature enough to talk about these things with their children.

a reply to: caladonea


+2 more 
posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: Telos

What does the sexuality of the Premier have to do with it?

I don't see anything wrong with teaching the kids the facts. In fact, more education is what is needed to combat teenage pregnancy and the spread of STDs.

I can see how this would bother someone who wishes to continue their own judgements and hateful treatment of LGBT people.


Well if for some people teaching the kids at 6 years of age about all that is mentioned in the OP is normal, then I can say this world is more sick then I thought. And premier's sexual orientation is a fact, not my invention.I don't have any judgement or hateful treatment of LGBT people. The thread is not even about that. You had the time to read through all so fast, or just reading two lines left and right and felt ready to comment? You shouldn't be derailing the thread or making accusations. If you're ok to raise your kids as degenerate pervs, I'm not.



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: caladonea
a reply to: Telos

I feel those sexual (supposed education) programs should not be in schools at all. I feel that parents should tell their children about those things in life...when the children are ready. Every child is different...and their timing and curiosity about such things is different too. Not every child is ready to hear and learn about such things at such young ages.

I get this awful feeling that there may be a (hidden pedofile agenda) for teaching such things to children at such a young age.

I am very frightened for and worried about the children of today.


I totally agree. Not for anything I mentioned the fact that the architect of all this was someone arrested for pedophilia.



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:47 AM
link   
No one is teaching 6 year olds about oral or anal sex, or teaching them to be "degenerate pervs" .

a reply to: Telos



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Telos
Well if for some people teaching the kids at 6 years of age about all that is mentioned in the OP is normal, then I can say this world is more sick then I thought.


Teaching them the proper names of body parts is sick?

I read the entire article before posting.



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Telos
Not for anything I mentioned the fact that the architect of all this was someone arrested for pedophilia.


Do you have a link for that, because he wasn't mentioned in the article...



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: Telos
Not for anything I mentioned the fact that the architect of all this was someone arrested for pedophilia.


Do you have a link for that, because he wasn't mentioned in the article...


Ontario sex-ed architect convicted on child porn charges: courtroom hears graphic details
edit on 15-3-2015 by Telos because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Telos

For what it's worth I agree with your sentiments, and can honestly say having lived in Ontario for 18 years..it has only gotten worse over the years.
edit on 15-3-2015 by threeeyesopen because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: Atsbhct
No one is teaching 6 year olds about oral or anal sex, or teaching them to be "degenerate pervs" .

a reply to: Telos



Oh I'm sorry. Is not teaching them at 6. It teaches them at 8. Two years more makes a lot of difference at that age



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:56 AM
link   
It's true that Dr. Ben Levin was convicted on child pornography charges , and as a professor of education at the University of Toronto, some of his findings on how to educate children about sex might be included in the new curriculum. This doesn't mean he included methods that would groom children for sexual predators.

a reply to: Benevolent Heretic



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 10:59 AM
link   
The article doesn't support the statement that children are being taught about oral and anal sex at the age of 8.

a reply to: Telos



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: caladonea
a reply to: Telos



I get this awful feeling that there may be a (hidden pedofile agenda) for teaching such things to children at such a young age.

I am very frightened for and worried about the children of today.


I had to quote you again because withing the pages of the first article, there is also something else that can answer to what you say. To avoid personal attacks or LGBT "actions" against my thread and my comment I have to make it clear that what I'm posting is published in a website (following article after the first one in the OP) and the other one is part of a journal called HuffPost Gay Voices


TORONTO, March 13, 2015 (LifeSiteNews.com) -- A homosexual activist has candidly admitted that gay-themed materials and policies pushed in grade schools across North America are for the sake of “indoctrinating” children into an unquestioning acceptance of homosexuality.

“I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn't indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie,” writes long-time Canadian gay activist S. Bear Bergman in a piece appearing on Huffington Post a week ago tellingly titled ‘I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And I'm Not a Bit Sorry).’

Bergman, who runs a Toronto-based publishing company making books for children that positively portrays “LGBTQ” people, is the transgender partner of J. Wallace, a gender equity adviser at the Toronto District School Board (TDSB).


In September 2014, Bergman’s publishing company offered a free “trans-positive kids (JK-2) book” to Toronto District School Board libraries. He said he was combating “fear-mongering” from school trustee Sam Sotiropoulos who had taken a stand against homosexual activism in the school board.

Bergman and Wallace’s book list for kids to “break gender stereotypes” has 54 titles, including:

Girls Will Be Boys Will Be Girls
Sometimes the Spoon Runs Away with Another Spoon
The Princess Knight
A Girl Named Dan
It’s Okay to be Different.
10,000 Dresses
My Princess Boy
My Mommy is a Boy
When Kathy is Keith



www.lifesitenews.com...


I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And I'm Not a Bit Sorry)


As a young queer activist, full of teenage certainty (and angst, and hormones), I used to bristle and complain at a lot of the things said about those of us who were doing the work of LGBTQ equity and inclusion. By far, with a bullet, my number one upset was with the people who accused us of recruiting. "You can't reproduce, you have to recruit!" shrieked one memorable fellow.

The first time I was introduced to this idea of reproduction and recruitment as the two paths to Being All The Homosexual I Could Be, I had two very strong reactions. I felt the revulsion of denial, of course -- we were not recruiting, and certainly not in the way that this asshole was suggesting we were. At the same time, I experienced a delicious fantasy in which I was in fact recruited and chosen to be queer. In it, I was ushered into the world of queerness with care and tenderness by experienced homos and trans people (in my imagination they were like very fabulous versions of my favorite camp counselors from childhood). I would be issued my leather jacket and my protest pins, my safer sex supplies and a hotline of some kind I could call if I needed it. As a teenaged homo trying to piece together strained relationships with my family or origin, it was a really nice idea.

I progressed to giving talks at high schools about LGBTQ acceptance and tolerance (those were the watchwords of the day) and again, the mail flowed -- how dare I indoctrinate impressionable young minds into the idea that queers and transfolk were just as fine and lovely a kind of human as any other kind.

My wickedness, you see. It knows no bounds.


www.huffingtonpost.com...



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Atsbhct
The article doesn't support the statement that children are being taught about oral and anal sex at the age of 8.

a reply to: Telos



I appreciate your opinion.



posted on Mar, 15 2015 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: Telos
Not for anything I mentioned the fact that the architect of all this was someone arrested for pedophilia.


Do you have a link for that, because he wasn't mentioned in the article...


here you go


TORONTO - By day, Ben Levin was the esteemed educator, tenured U of T professor, former Ontario deputy education minister, the expert who had the ear of premiers and leaders the world over. And in his off hours? He liked to frequent an online incest chat room to counsel single moms on how to sexually assault their daughters for his pleasure and theirs, a site where his profile listed his sexuality as “nothing is taboo.” How frightening to think this was the man who had so much influence on education in this province and beyond. A look at his Facebook page shows that he was speaking at conferences and workshops around the globe before his July 2013 arrest. And all the while, he was going back to his hotel room and logging on to the “M” website — its real name concealed due to ongoing investigations — where he shared, created and discussed the sexual abuse of the very children he sought to educate.

On Aug. 12, 2012, Toronto Police Det.-Const. Janelle Blackadar went on the site posing as a sexually submissive single mother interested in the sexualization of her children. Levin encouraged her to sexually touch her two daughters and told her he had done the same to his own three girls when they were as young as 12. The court heard, though, that it was all talk — there’s no evidence Levin sexually abused his daughters and faces no such charges.

In December, 2012, he was also online with Angela Johnson, a London, Ont. investigator posing as a single mom of three kids. Levin also told her he had been sexually active with his own daughters. “Miss that a lot,” he said online, “but we had many wonderful years.”


www.torontosun.com...


Levin — a former deputy education minister who is expected to plead guilty to child porn-related charges Tuesday — repeatedly highlighted his role as overseeing curriculum issues. In a 2009 newsletter, the then-deputy minister said he was “responsible for ... everything that they do” and to “implement” the “new” approach.
This was the beginning of the 63-year-old’s involvement in the controversial curriculum change. Once a professor at the University of Toronto’s Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, there are many interpretations about Levin’s part in the curriculum, but it’s his own definition that should clear it up. On March 6, 2009, Levin wrote and signed a memo that put himself in charge of Ontario’s school curriculum. “Dear colleagues, I am writing to provide an update on our sector’s agenda ...
I will be filling the ADM (assistant deputy minster) position previously held by George Zegarac ...
www.torontosun.com...
edit on Sun Mar 15 2015 by DontTreadOnMe because: trimmed very long quotes IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS



new topics

top topics



 
19
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join