It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
Sad but true,
I just spent 10 minutes on my lunch break looking in the mirror and preening my hair in the restroom. I have really nice long brown hair that goes past my shoulders with natural banana curls and natural golden highlights here and there. I literally caught myself saying "damn my hair looks good"
I don't know if that makes me like half a girl or a dude with a strong feminine side or if I'm just a self absorbed douch. But I just caught myself doing something I never though I do. But apparently I do.
Bass lowers head in shame
Hot guys tend to underestimate women's interest in them, while other men, particularly those looking for a one-night stand, are more likely to think a woman is much more into them than she actually is, a new study says.
Women, however, showed the opposite bias — they routinely underestimated men's interest in them.
volutionary pressure could explain the discrepancies on the male side of this equation, say the researchers.
"There are two ways you can make an error as a man," said study researcher and psychologist CarinPerilloux. "Either you think, 'Oh, wow, that woman's really interested in me' — and it turns out she's not. There's some cost to that."
The other error is much bigger in terms of reproductive success: "She's interested, and he totally misses out. He misses out on a mating opportunity," Perilloux said.
Men's tendency to overestimate a women's interest, particularly if he also overestimates his own attractiveness, may boost self-confidence and make them appear more attractive as mates, according to the researchers.
"This pattern of results may reflect a suite of adaptations designed to promote positive illusions among lower-quality men," the researchers write in the study published in a forthcoming issue of the journal Psychological Science.
If we look at the ego-I as the whole body-mind, then that makes the most sense. In fact, we relate to one another as body-minds. I don't relate to my neighbor as some separate sense of self inside his head or wherever. I relate to him as the body-mind just like he apparently relates to me in the same manner.
Why do we tend to relate to our own body-mind as though it was separate from us?
OJust to be clear, you are saying that the self exists as a "psychological entity" - and does this mean that this self is not the body-mind, but some separate entity within the body-mind? And this is what you call yourself or "I"? If so, what or who is that?
originally posted by: bb23108
Many super stars are known for not just their great skills, but their "super" egos too.
originally posted by: bb23108
I don't relate to my neighbor as some separate sense of self inside his head or wherever. I relate to him as the body-mind just like he apparently relates to me in the same manner.
Why do we tend to relate to our own body-mind as though it was separate from us?
originally posted by: eisegesis
Women earning doctoral degrees in psychology outnumber men three to one. What does this mean for the future of the field?
originally posted by: Astyanax
What the #@*?>//# is a body-mind?
originally posted by: Astyanax
I am an animal with a highly developed brain. That brain perceives the world as being comprised of objects. One of these objects is me. The name my brain gives to this object is 'myself'.
originally posted by: Astyanax
People relate to one another as people.
originally posted by: Astyanax
Why do we tend to relate to our own body-mind as though it was separate from us?
It's called consciousness. It's normal.
originally posted by: Bluesma
originally posted by: bb23108
Many super stars are known for not just their great skills, but their "super" egos too.
I disagree. Coming from a Hollywood family, and having Christmas parties filled with celebrities, turned me away from an early interest in acting- particularly because of what I saw of actors. Their ego was not "strong" they didn't have a stable sense of self- it was constantly in flux, whore to public opinion, changing forms with roles (as each character made them intensely aware of different sides of their self, they would identify with different characteristics from one year to another). The more powerful people (like directors and producers) didn't have that problem, and looked down upon actors in a subtle way.
originally posted by: Bluesma
originally posted by: bb23108
I don't relate to my neighbor as some separate sense of self inside his head or wherever. I relate to him as the body-mind just like he apparently relates to me in the same manner.
Why do we tend to relate to our own body-mind as though it was separate from us?
Why consider what you call "body-mind" as something separate from "us"?
originally posted by: Bluesma
I do relate to my neighbor as a separate sense of self inside his head- we may all be one, he may have a body which is obviously separate, but also, has a mental separation, in which he has perception which differs from mine. That seems important, to me to respect and acknowledge. Without doing so, I will just react and respond to him as if he has the same desires, views, experiences, as I have had- which is false. The other levels of being, we can interact on in other subtle dimensions beyond physical and do, but on the level of "body-mind" it is completely appropriate to acknowledge each other as very different.
celebrities'... ego was not "strong"
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: bb23108
Awareness cannot look at itself.
Says who? Have you never heard the term 'self-awareness'?