It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“How can we effect change in the world when only half of it is invited to participate in the conversation? Men, I would like to take this opportunity to extend your formal invitation. Gender equality is your issue, too.”
“I’ve seen my father’s role as a parent being valued less by society. I’ve seen young men suffering from illness, unable to ask for help for fear it will make them less of a man …. I’ve seen men fragile and insecure by a distorted sense of what constitutes male success. Men don’t have the benefits of equality, either. We don’t often talk about men being imprisoned by gender stereotypes but I can see that they are.”
Watson said liberating men from stereotypes ultimately benefits women.
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: InTheLight
I think there is a problem with how men are viewed, look at some of the comments on here about how men are feminised and how many more gay men there are now than their used ot be.
This is all part of the same issue, say there is something wrong with men who are trying to move away from the stereotypes they been forced into in the past.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
The number of American troops killed in Afghanistan and Iraq between 2001 and 2012 was 6,488. The number of American women who were murdered by current or ex male partners during that time was 11,766. That's nearly double the amount of casualties lost during war.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: WilsonWilson
I hate to spoil any easy dichotomy, but, as a rule, I don't believe we can judge gay men as more feminine than anyone else, including their straight counterparts.
Being gay doesn't make one automatically effeminate. Just ask a Lesbian.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: WilsonWilson
I hate to spoil any easy dichotomy, but, as a rule, I don't believe we can judge gay men as more feminine than anyone else, including their straight counterparts.
Being gay doesn't make one automatically effeminate. Just ask a Lesbian.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
You poor men and women with your gender plights. No gender is holding another gender back. If you're behind in any way, it's because you never did anything to get ahead. No one is going to hand you anything on a silver platter, which seems to be the modus operandi of both feminism and men's rights.
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: maddy21
oh come on, who holds the power here in the UK? public school educated posh boys, yet they got there through merit?
No they didnt, they got there through connections and knowing the right people and the boys club mentality.
Your basically syaing women dont hold many positions or power because we are incapable of it, which is a load of mysogynistic rubbish.
The fact is many countries are now starting to look at not having enough evidence to prosecute for rape as beinga false acccusation but this is patently not true.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Pinke
You don't think there's any significant problem with the differences in pay between American men and American women? Given.
Bombastic or not, correlation or causation (or not), you are not concerned with the prevalence of male against female violence in this country? Okay ...
Ah, the "per capita" manipulation. But okay, okay, point ceded because we're not arguing statistics or semantics; it does look like a ridiculous concern if you look at it that way.
In fact, if you used the world population as the "per capita" for both numbers of victims, why it'd look like no problem at all.
Anytime people aren't shooting virtual spit-balls at each other, I consider a fine discussion.
I'm not sure, in the end, what you're trying to say to me, but if you were offended, you have my apology.
originally posted by: maddy21
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: maddy21
oh come on, who holds the power here in the UK? public school educated posh boys, yet they got there through merit?
No they didnt, they got there through connections and knowing the right people and the boys club mentality.
Your basically syaing women dont hold many positions or power because we are incapable of it, which is a load of mysogynistic rubbish.
The fact is many countries are now starting to look at not having enough evidence to prosecute for rape as beinga false acccusation but this is patently not true.
Again, people get to powerful positions through Merit. Very few people actually have the connections. Gender has nothing to do with it. If a person has the right connections then it isn't really a gender problem. Stop making excuses and blaming men for everything. If you want to get on top you have to work just like the majority of us. The problem with women is the complete inability to accept their own faults and blame everyone else for their problems.
Two U.S. researchers, Luce and Hewlett, studied the career trajectories of a large number of women and noted that female executives were more likely to follow paths filled with “horizontal” career interruptions. Reasons vary and include motherhood, a husband’s career, family commitments to children or aging parents, or personal preferences. Women consider such temporary exits from their career a natural thing. However, reintegrating back into the organisation and finding a job that suits their talents often proves impossible.
Read more: forbesindia.com...
The conclusion to all this is clear: the barriers (behaviors, labels, biases…) that prohibit the progression of women to the top are deep-rooted, pernicious, and ubiquitous … and much more prevalent than we imagine and recognise.
Ending this unfair discrimination against women requires understanding, creativity, commitment and perseverance, and foremost positive action by both men and women. As my colleague Jean-François Manzoni points out, “We do not see the world as it is, we see it as we are.” The implication is that the first change we need to make is to see the world as it really is.
The idea that this discrimination will, or ought to, end “voluntarily” just flatly defies the research we have mentioned. Things are too ingrained. Patterns must be broken. And that is where regulation – such as a quota for women - has its place. Hopefully temporarily …