Should we just focus on Building 7?

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: daftpink

What's your thoughts on it? Do you disagree with the possibility that it was a planned attack? (to some extent at least with reference to building 7).

So yah, 911 was planned and promoted as an attack on America to further the goals of world conquest.

The September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States were a Zionist “coup d'etat” to seize power in the country and launch a permanent war on Islam on behalf of Israel, an American scholar and journalist in Wisconsin says.

presstv.com...

This is a very good possibility, and even if you disagree, the simple fact is people deserve to know the truth of what REALLY happened on 9/11.

a reply to: intrptr

I didn't say that was the reason - 'to further the goals of world conquest'.

But I'm sensing that's what you think I believe? I still don't know your opinion.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: daftpink

What's your thoughts on it? Do you disagree with the possibility that it was a planned attack? (to some extent at least with reference to building 7).

So yah, 911 was planned and promoted as an attack on America to further the goals of world conquest.

By whom?

a reply to: Jchristopher5

So instead of replying to posts refuting your theory about 'obvious controlled demolition' regarding your OP and building 7, we are off after a missile at the pentagon now?

Should we just focus on Building 7?

I take it you answered your own question in the OP then?

Round and round we go. You are not after truth.

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: Jchristopher5

So instead of replying to posts refuting your theory about 'obvious controlled demolition' regarding your OP and building 7, we are off after a missile at the pentagon now?

Round and round we go. You are not after truth.

You are funny. You accuse this post of having nothing original, and yet you postulate the same ridiculous arguments, in response after response. Pot.. kettle.

I am definitely after the truth, and I have seen absolutely nothing from you to indicate you are anywhere near it. You expound on the same OS that it's authors said was "politically motivated", a "cover-up", "underfunded", and full of lies.

So, enjoy your story. I would prefer to read Mother Goose than the crap you offer.

a reply to: Jchristopher5

A missile.

Just 'a missile'? What kind, if you would?

A plane was used as 'a missile' if you ask me.

originally posted by: daftpink
a reply to: intrptr

I didn't say that was the reason - 'to further the goals of world conquest'.

But I'm sensing that's what you think I believe? I still don't know your opinion.

That is my opinion.

a reply to: intrptr

ok thanks I just thought you were being sarcastic.

originally posted by: Jchristopher5

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: daftpink

What's your thoughts on it? Do you disagree with the possibility that it was a planned attack? (to some extent at least with reference to building 7).

So yah, 911 was planned and promoted as an attack on America to further the goals of world conquest.

By whom?

Bush and Cheneys sealed testimony before the 911 commission in the whitehouse would go a long way to answering that.

Gotta go…

a reply to: Jchristopher5

I'm still waiting on the explanation of how was it wired..

if your going to call me an Os stooge please show me where I said the Os was 100% right.

a reply to: Jchristopher5

If you even watched the videos, what caused all the widows below the penthouse collapse to deform as that structure fell through the building? Explosives? Only on the left side of the building?

Not very 'planned' for a demolition.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Jchristopher5

A missile.

Just 'a missile'? What kind, if you would?

A plane was used as 'a missile' if you ask me.

I really could only pass someone else's opinion on what type, sorry. I don't know.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Jchristopher5

I'm still waiting on the explanation of how was it wired..

if your going to call me an Os stooge please show me where I said the Os was 100% right.

I don't have to understand aerodynamics and flight theory to understand that planes to, in fact, fly. Nor, do I have to understand how a building is wired to believe it was demolished.

Did I ever call you and "OS stooge"? If so, show me where I used those words.

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: whatsup86

Like it was suddenly normal for skyscrapers to drop like they were made out of playing cards?

Like it's common for fully loaded 757's to be directly flown at full speed into buildings.

Why is it necessary for OS'ers to always say things like, Fully Loaded, Fully Fueled, like that is somehow different than every other plane out there ???

Smacks of sensationalism in trying to make these planes out to be more than just everyday normal jetliners, that actually turn to ribbons when they hit things.

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: whatsup86

Like it was suddenly normal for skyscrapers to drop like they were made out of playing cards?

Like it's common for fully loaded 757's to be directly flown at full speed into buildings.

Why is it necessary for OS'ers to always say things like, Fully Loaded, Fully Fueled, like that is somehow different than every other plane out there ???

Smacks of sensationalism in trying to make these planes out to be more than just everyday normal jetliners, that actually turn to ribbons when they hit things.

Your right, and it's ironic that sensationalism is what they accuse "truthers" of doing.

As I mentioned in a previous post, I know it's meant to be offensive, but I wear "Truther" as a badge of honor. The truth is just right after all.

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: whatsup86

Like it was suddenly normal for skyscrapers to drop like they were made out of playing cards?

Like it's common for fully loaded 757's to be directly flown at full speed into buildings.

Why is it necessary for OS'ers to always say things like, Fully Loaded, Fully Fueled, like that is somehow different than every other plane out there ???

Smacks of sensationalism in trying to make these planes out to be more than just everyday normal jetliners, that actually turn to ribbons when they hit things.

Right. What difference does 11,500 gallons of jet fuel, at this point, matter?

originally posted by: stosh64

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: whatsup86

Like it was suddenly normal for skyscrapers to drop like they were made out of playing cards?

Like it's common for fully loaded 757's to be directly flown at full speed into buildings.

Why is it necessary for OS'ers to always say things like, Fully Loaded, Fully Fueled, like that is somehow different than every other plane out there ???

Smacks of sensationalism in trying to make these planes out to be more than just everyday normal jetliners, that actually turn to ribbons when they hit things.

Right. What difference does 11,500 gallons of jet fuel, at this point, matter?

You're absolutely right!

Especially considering it is impossible for jet fuel (1600 degrees) to melt steel (about 2600 degrees) although melted steel is exactly what several witnesses reported, yet was such testimony was left out of the highly-flawed OS.

a reply to: Jchristopher5

You are good at cherry picking what you answer.

Just like you are at cherry picking the facts that fit your agenda.

I am still waiting for your response about what I showed you regarding the collapse of building 7..........

Put the above information together with what Susan Lindauer said about Iraq, 911 and the background information she gave and things become quite obvious. Not that these types of false flags haven't happened before in history. Just search the web for "extreme prejudice" and "Susan Lindauer" and you will find lots of interesting information. The rabbit hole goes much deeper in other areas.

originally posted by: Jchristopher5

originally posted by: stosh64

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: whatsup86

Like it was suddenly normal for skyscrapers to drop like they were made out of playing cards?

Like it's common for fully loaded 757's to be directly flown at full speed into buildings.

Why is it necessary for OS'ers to always say things like, Fully Loaded, Fully Fueled, like that is somehow different than every other plane out there ???

Smacks of sensationalism in trying to make these planes out to be more than just everyday normal jetliners, that actually turn to ribbons when they hit things.

Right. What difference does 11,500 gallons of jet fuel, at this point, matter?

You're absolutely right!

Especially considering it is impossible for jet fuel (1600 degrees) to melt steel (about 2600 degrees) although melted steel is exactly what several witnesses reported, yet was such testimony was left out of the highly-flawed OS.

For like the one hundred millionth time...IT DOES NOT HAVE TO MELT IT TO WEAKEN IT TO THE POINT OF FAILURE!!!! For crying out loud. Steel loses over EIGHTY PERCENT of its strength at temperatures that even you Truthers admit were present that day. Are you actually going to say that you do not understand that the loss of EIGHTY PERCENT of the material's strength in a building that size would kind of sort of be a problem? Jeebus, the willful ignorance of the Truther movement is mind blowing!