It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: Jchristopher5
Wow, you are thick headed.
Again, for the third time, I mentioned that it was a fact that it was reported on the BBC before the building collapsed. I did not claim the BBC was in on the conspiracy, but clearly they reported something before it happened.
Either way, it doesn't change the fact this is the smoking gun on the official story being false. I suspect that you are aware of that, and that you are trying to lead me into a rabbit hole.
The amount of assumptions that would have to be made to allow for the apparent early reporting of building 7 by the BBC to be done for nefarious reasons would lead most critical thinkers to have serious doubts.
That is all that I have to say about the reporting from the BBC today. Perhaps the reporter is a psychic (unlikely)? Maybe it was a "simple mistake (unlikely).
Draw whatever conclusion that you choose. Why don't you address the rest of the points, if you really seek the truth?
Yeah perhaps the BBC are part of the evil plot (likely) lol
If this is how you react to a critical eye placed upon one of your talking points/claims I think i'll leave it here.
However I do understand a little bit more as to why you guys have the label you do.
A bipartisan group of congressmen joined with 9/11 family members today to renew efforts to declassify 28 pages of a joint congressional inquiry into the worst terrorist attack against the United States.
The information, redacted by President George W. Bush, is believed to point to allegations that Saudi Arabia may have assisted in financing the 9/11 terrorists....The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11 and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier,” said former Sen. Bob Graham, D-Florida, who co-chaired the inquiry and helped to write the report.
“The position of the United States government has been to protect Saudi Arabia,” former senator Graham contended. “At virtually every step of the judicial process, when the United States government was called upon to take a position, it has been a position adverse to the interests of United States citizens seeking justice and protective of the government which, in my judgment, was the most responsible for that network of support,” Graham said, referring to Saudi Arabia.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Realtruth
Let's see.....FDNY had already watched two buildings collapse that day that had killed 343 of their brothers and sisters. They were staring at a heavily damaged building which had fires growing in it and they did not have water to fight said fires. Then they set up a transit to measure the building and it was recording an increasing tilt to the building.
Yeah, there was no way to foresee that WTC 7 was going to collapse as well......
…but this isn't crap, the events of 9/11 have rippled through time and changed EVERYTHING to this point.