It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Jchristopher5
Your first problem to overcome is almost never talked about on conspiracy sites.
They were watching the building all day.
They continued measured its leaning all day.
Every single firefighter lost friends that day.
Some firefighters lost brothers or fathers that day.
For your 'smoking gun' to be true it would mean that hundreds of firefighters sold out their families lives for some government payoff.
Not possible !
Your belief is WRONG !
originally posted by: Jchristopher5
As a new "Truther" I have been shocked to the amazing details behind the 9/11 conspiracy. You could outline 100 very questionable, curious, and generally unexplainable events around 9/11. But, there is one facit that stands out as the smoking gun. I know there are other threads on Building 7, and this one might get locked as a result, but I wanted to bring it to "top of the stack" again, because or is absolutley damning to the official story. The 9/11 defenders of the official story have no where to go with Building 7, no place to hide. They can deflect and call us "truthers" or "conspiracy theorists" but they cannot avoid these simple facts:
1. Building 7 fell at free fall velocity for 2.25 seconds, and crumbled into it's footprint in a way identical to a modern demolition. This 2.25 second freefall was acknowledged in the NIST report.
2. The building's demise was left out of the tainted "Official 9/11 report" (aka "The official conspiracy theory"), likely because of the fact its fall is not explainable.
3. It's fall was reported in the BBC before it happened, and you can clearly see the building in the background.
4. The NIST report refused to provide a model of its collapse, saying it "might jeopardize public safety".
5. The leaseholder, Larry Silverstein confirmed the obvious, that the building was demolished in a 2002 PBS interview.
Based on these facts, it's a slam dunk, why do we even bother with the 99 other points to try to prove the official 9/11 story is a lie?
No reasonable person can argue with the fact that Building 7 was demolished. A building demolition requires a great deal of pre-planning and execution. It simply could not have been wired on the day of 9/11.
In other words, the facts surrounding Building 7 conclusively prove that the official story is a lie. If this part is a lie, then we can probably assume there are others. Also, if we were lied to about Building 7, which we clearly were, then it gives plenty of reason to DEMAND a new 9/11 investigation.
You should drive these facts home to your friends and family, and we should demand a new investigation. That is what I am doing. Here is a short video which reviews these points.
Short Building 7 Smoking Gun video
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Jchristopher5
we should demand a new investigation
Why bother? You already said…
why do we even bother with the 99 other points to try to prove the official 9/11 story is a lie?
Don't watch this, you minds already made up.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
Is the OP claiming the BBC were in on a 9/11 conspiracy?......
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
The only way for 911 to be an inside job is for hundreds if not thousands of people to be involved in the plot and the cover up that followed. The sheer amount of people involved would need to be enormous.
The global warming crowd says that getting that many people to agree to lie is impossible.