A Question That Evolutionist Couldn't Answer

originally posted by: TechUnique
So when my science teacher TAUGHT me, ... in SCHOOL, that we evolved from Monkeys, he was wrong?

So what is right?

A common ancestor not from monkeys.

a reply to: TechUnique

No the joke is people who bleat bs and when shown evidence dismiss it due to their religious teachings.
No amount of evidence will do for your kind.
Also the biggest joke is you saying evolution should nit be taught in schools.
I have given you a link to all your answers and if you choose to ignore it all you are the joke.
Just sick of ignorance.
Do your homework.

a reply to: TechUnique

I'm struggling to believe you went to school myself.

a reply to: TechUnique

Yes but do they change into a different animal/species? No? Well what does? And where is the proof?

And there we have it. An in-principle acceptance that evolution is real. Now, just imagine what might happen to those fish over millions of years, not just a couple.

Kind Regards
Myselfaswell

a reply to: GetHyped

Not if she's a wheelchair.

If God gave free will, one of the ultimate ways to exercise free will would be to adapt and/or change ones body to suit individual needs. Not too sure if "evolution" goes against God, creations were given free will and that should include the right to change or modify descendents.

a reply to: GetHyped

Empirical evidence that man changed from one species to another. Yup, still awaiting that 'Empirical' evidence you guys claim you have. Showing something adapting does not prove that something can evolve into a DIFFERENT SPECIES.

Show me evidence of something evolving into a different species and we'll talk. Until then you are just regurgitating something someone told you and giving it wayyy too much credit.

"evolved from monkeys" and "missing link" The two schoolboy errors creationists make

originally posted by: Elton

originally posted by: TechUnique
So when my science teacher TAUGHT me, ... in SCHOOL, that we evolved from Monkeys, he was wrong?

So what is right?

A common ancestor not from monkeys.

But we still used to be a different species than what we are now right? We switched from one species to another with gradual change over time?

So where's the proof of that?

Can you should us the evidence of how you believe we came to be?

Talking empirical evidence here, not anecdotal from a book.


Or are you gonna cop out and say that you don't need it since you have faith?

originally posted by: amurphy245
"evolved from monkeys" and "missing link" The two schoolboy errors creationists make

So the 'school boy errors' that were taught to me in school as fact are no longer true. Yet I'm to trust that evolution should still be taught in school even though there is no general consensus and still no proof.

No thanks.

a reply to: amurphy245

Is the common ancestor not the "link" between Apes & Humans that is "missing"?


And if we are a different species to Apes then how did the common ancestor create two different species of descendents?




I don't think this is the place for semantics about phrasing.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
Can you should us the evidence of how you believe we came to be?

Talking empirical evidence here, not anecdotal from a book.


Or are you gonna cop out and say that you don't need it since you have faith?

I thought we were talking about evolution, when did I mention creationism? Or are you trying to divert the course of the thread?

Sneaky.

a reply to: TechUnique

Belief is a key word here, lets break it down.
1. accept that (something) is true, especially without proof.
-accept the statement of (someone) as true.
-have religious faith
-feel sure that (someone) is capable of doing something.
2. hold (something) as an opinion; think.

OK, well first I am not sure if you are trying to define belief with your breakdown but let me give you a real diffinition of belief.

belief
noun be·lief \bə-ˈlēf\
Full Definition of BELIEF
1
: a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing
2
: something believed; especially : a tenet or body of tenets held by a group
3
: conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some being or phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence

Second to answer the random guy asking people if evolution has been observed then pulling the mic away from them while they are answering below are some links. BTW I can make a video and cut it to make people look stupid as well which is what he did. In fact I believe there are some videos that expose that JACK for what he is on the net.


Genomic evolution during a 10,000-generation experiment with bacteria

Florida Lizards Evolve Rapidly, Within 15 Years and 20 Generations


8 Examples of Evolution in Action

a reply to: Grimpachi

Did those lizards change into a different species? LOL.

Seriously guys. You keep showing me evidence of things adapting, that's cool, I'm not denying that. Still waiting for evidence that things can evolve into a different species. Yet you all keep banging the same drum like a bunch of sheep.

(try not to spit out your coffee all over your keyboard)

a reply to: boymonkey74

we've yet to find the link, so no one can say evolution is definitive can they.

Again, micro evolution/adaptation- true.

Macro - still unproven.

originally posted by: IntroduceALittleIrony
a reply to: boymonkey74

we've yet to find the link, so no one can say evolution is definitive can they.

Again, micro evolution/adaptation- true.

Macro - still unproven.

Exactly. This is the point I'm trying to argue yet they will continue to spout nonsense to back their wild claims.

YAWN.

a reply to: TechUnique

No just asking if you set your self to the same standards as what you want everyone else to fulfill.

All the example of evolution presented in this thread is nothing but adaptation within a species, not transformation from one kind to another. The birds are still birds, moths, still moths, lizards still lizards, bacteria still bacteria.

Never will there be presented examples of the natural transformation of one kind to another, and therein lies the crux of the matter.

I think why these threads end up in an all out war is because no one makes the point of whether they're discussing;

a) evolutionary adaption & improvement (believable & provable imo)...

as opposed to;

b) Darwinism (unbelievable & unprovable imo)...



But that's just the way I see it.