It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RedParrotHead
a reply to: Tangerine
Sorry, I guess my sarcasm wasn't as obvious as I intended. I was just predicting what fanatically religious folks would say.
originally posted by: soulfire
Well there is no part of the bible found that was written before or during the time of Jesus. That includes old testament new testament, lost books and gnostic gospels. The earliest book was written around 50 AD all the way to 300 AD so the age of this book isn't that far off. I don't think the question here is whether the book is real or fake but whether the bible itself is real or fake. Well obviously real as a book but are many of the stories fake, we know some are so which ones are which? You know Joseph Smith copied the story of Mohamed to create the morman religion and no one seems to see those similarities. See it doesn't matter if the book is real or fake the whole story of Jesus may very well be fake.
a reply to: shauny
originally posted by: shauny
a reply to: ccseagull
HA HA @ Zooming into my Kitchen
I respect people, I respect views. In Scotland Catholic/Protestant issues are REALLY bad, people die in 2015 over them still.
The West of my Country has become almost as bad as Northern Ireland. I am in the East and I have not seen as much as a flute band in my life, lucky I guess, they cause huge problems. I think people can do as they please, but when a Protestant band walk through a Catholic area it becomes something else.
Football (Soccer is lived and breathed here, it is what we live for and do, pretty much same as all over Europe I guess. I always say "It's not the flag you fly, it's what you are intending on doing, what your reasons for flying it are"
Here Protestant's fly Israel flags
Catholics fly Palestine flags
It is a LOT more than just flags.
I am half Irish/Scottish.
Called Shaun...
Support Celtic Football Club
Used to be a Catholic
HARD GIG IN SCOTLAND let me tell you!! lol
It is political now, religion is masked these days.
Rangers sing "Up to our knee's in fenian blood"
Celtic sing this:
Scotland is a very loyalist/Unionist place. Mason's are in over drive here.
Saying that a tourist ANYWHERE in my small country would not notice any of this..
This is what our Country is at it's worst...It has subtitles.
It is pretty bad, so I am warning.. lol
I understand oppression first hand, both Scotland and Ireland were killed, raped and more by England.
I lean more towards being 'Republican' NOT IRA! Just Republican. I hate to see oppression, like the song above.
I don't hate Israel, I can't. I do however think Palestine should be seen as a country, whatever.
We gave peace a chance over here, it took a time, but we did it.
The queen shook hands with the man who killer her Cousin, Louis Mountbatten. Many seen hope.
It caused a LOT of problems.
One day Religion will not kill people. It has stopped here in reality.
Sorry for the long reply... I was on a roll lol
originally posted by: OptimusSubprime
a reply to: shauny
Just because this may be a legitimate, authentic "bible" doesn't mean what it says is legitimate. The way our modern Bibles are translated involves an enormous amount of textual criticism that involves the tedious comparing of thousands of manuscripts. If you have 100 manuscripts from all over the known world of Biblical times, and 97 of them agree, while 3 of them do not, then it is safe to say that the 3 that do not were corrupted or copied wrong or whatever, therefore those 3 do not get considered as credible or legitimate when translating the Bible. This book in the OP, if it doesn't agree with the overwhelming, vast majority of manuscripts and codices that have already been discovered and studied then all we have here is a 1500 year old piece of garbage.
To use an analogy from contemporary times, imagine if 1000 people saved the newspaper from the day after 9/11 with the headline "World Trade Center Attacked!!" Let's pretend that out of those 1000 papers, 7 of them made a mistake when printing and the headline said "Empire State Building Attacked!!" 2000 years from now, when archaeologists start digging and find a few copies of these papers, they may find the incorrect papers first, and therefore conclude that the Empire State building was attacked, but over the course of a few years of digging, they find more and more papers, until eventually they have all 1000 or even 850 and all of them but a few say "World Trade Center Attacked!!" It would then be very easy to conclude that the few they have with "Empire State Building" are wrong and have no credibility.
originally posted by: primus2012
How convenient that this predicts the coming of Mohammed, the greatest fraud outside the serpent in Eden. It didn't predict Mohammed 3,000 years ago, but approx 1500 years ago, which is approx the time of Mohammed? Yeah, nothing unlikely about that coincidence.
This is likely created by Mohammed's posse after they started their little cult of debauchery and slavery.
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: RedParrotHead
a reply to: Tangerine
Sorry, I guess my sarcasm wasn't as obvious as I intended. I was just predicting what fanatically religious folks would say.
Ah!
originally posted by: TechUnique
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: RedParrotHead
a reply to: Tangerine
Sorry, I guess my sarcasm wasn't as obvious as I intended. I was just predicting what fanatically religious folks would say.
Ah!
AH! Delight in the mockery of others
Seriously Tangerine, I don't like your attitude.
That's a fair comment right? I'm sure you'd say the same about me.
John 11:25
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die;
Romans 8:13
For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live.
originally posted by: Collateral
Very interesting.
How did they come up with the date it was made though? Is it a rough assumption or have they conducted testing to prove this claim?
Media outlets have been abuzz this week with the news that the oldest fragment of a New Testament gospel -- and thus the earliest witness of Jesus' life and ministry -- had been discovered hidden inside an Egyptian mummy mask and was going to be published.
The announcement of the papyrus' discovery and impending publication was made by Craig Evans, professor of New Testament at Acadia Divinity College in Wolfville, Nova Scotia. Evans described the papyrus as a fragment of the Gospel of Mark.
He added that a combination of handwriting analysis (paleography) and carbon dating led him and his team of researchers to conclude that the fragment was written before 90 A.D.
I am saying, if the Bibles of today are real, then this is real. If this new book is fake, they are all fake. I dislike what religion does to this planet. So for me I know it will hurt friends and family, but to all religious people reading this, you can't have your cake and eat it. This is either real or fake.
originally posted by: soulfire
Well there is no part of the bible found that was written before or during the time of Jesus. That includes old testament new testament, lost books and gnostic gospels. The earliest book was written around 50 AD all the way to 300 AD so the age of this book isn't that far off.