It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Clinton leading all Republicans by double digits

page: 2
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

John McCain was 72 when he ran.

Ron Paul was even older.




posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee




There is no one else that even comes close to her experience and knowledge. She's also extremely intelligent --- whether haters want to admit it or not.


Strong dislike, but totally agree. There is no denying she is very bright, no denying she is very experienced when it comes to politics. Really pitting Romney or Bush against her seems absurd. She's a heavyweight, they're not.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:24 AM
link   
I am fully aware that the Right is making a big deal about Hillary's health.

I need facts.

Not intentional media propaganda.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

She's also extremely intelligent --- whether haters want to admit it or not.



So was Eva Braun.



Why would any girl vote for that?


Mike Grouchy
edit on 23-1-2015 by mikegrouchy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Annee




There is no one else that even comes close to her experience and knowledge. She's also extremely intelligent --- whether haters want to admit it or not.


Strong dislike, but totally agree. There is no denying she is very bright, no denying she is very experienced when it comes to politics. Really pitting Romney or Bush against her seems absurd. She's a heavyweight, they're not.

Thanks.

I'm really not taking sides here. Just trying to be straight forward logical.

I don't like or approve of "emotional" politics.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: rupertg
a reply to: Annee

John McCain was 72 when he ran.

Ron Paul was even older.


I know there's been questions regarding Hillary's health.

They seem trumped up by the Right. Exaggerated after she passed out and hit her head hard enough to have a concussion.

To me --- it comes off as women are the weaker sex. One incident --- and because she's a woman her political career is in danger.

I don't know the facts of her health. But, doubt seriously the political right does either.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee




I'm really not taking sides here. Just trying to be straight forward logical.


I know it, you're being reasonable. It seems so often people take a reasonable position and dissenters turn it into something else if they have a different reasonable position (but they usually don't have a reasonable stance).

You're good people. We may not always agree, but I am very aware that you want what's best, and that at the end of the day we just seem to disagree at times on which road to take to reach the destination we're both hoping to arrive at.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:39 AM
link   
Id rather vote for Medussa...................or some other snake headed charmer........

edit on 23-1-2015 by stirling because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: Annee

She's also extremely intelligent --- whether haters want to admit it or not.



So was Eva Braun.



Why would any girl vote for that?


Mike Grouchy


Not known for her intellect.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: diggerdog
I know Regan was 69 . I just wonder about her health ,, I'm not cutting her down , It's an honest question . reply to: mOjOm



I believe you're being honest. After all 67 isn't exactly what you call a spring chicken or anything. No offense of course!!


I just wondered if anyone remembers Reagan and if there were people wondering if he was too old to be Pres. being that he's one of the oldest ones on record.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
She's also extremely intelligent


Yeah, but so was Lex Luthor.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm

originally posted by: Annee
She's also extremely intelligent


Yeah, but so was Lex Luthor.


LOL

As a SciFi fan --- that made me laugh.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 12:58 AM
link   
Yes they did and I was one of them . I'm an Independent voter , I ask question. Thanks reply to: mOjOm



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 01:02 AM
link   
Here's a laugh


Reagan was the guest speaker at my high school graduation.


edit on 23-1-2015 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 01:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee


I need facts.


Try looking into the facts of Vince Foster being murdered for starters...



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 01:32 AM
link   
Looks like Hillary's going to get her own back on Bill under the white house table Clinton.
Probably some whitehouse toy boy! Or maybe an Alien lizard!
edit on 23-1-2015 by RP2SticksOfDynamite because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 01:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: coastlinekid
a reply to: Annee


I need facts.


Try looking into the facts of Vince Foster being murdered for starters...



Do you think I just jumped into this?

I started with ICQ in 1997, I think. Then I was in a "no holds barred" political discussion forum for about 6 years.

You can "conspiracy" away all you want on Vince Foster. When you have proof, make sure you get that proof to the person(s) who can prosecute the Clintons. Along with "Travelgate", "Troopergate", etc.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 01:52 AM
link   
If rand Paul were to get the gop nomination, he'd best Hillary.

Otherwise, Hillary will win, no doubt.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 01:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: WP4YT
If rand Paul were to get the gop nomination, he'd best Hillary.

Otherwise, Hillary will win, no doubt.


Rand Paul is too extreme.

I don't think he has a chance.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 02:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: muse7
I don't see a Republican taking the White House again in my lifetime.


Then how do you explain the House, a Senate land sides ?

Back to back presidential victories are rare.

Last one was Reagan/ Bush to Bush/ Quayle.

As my pappy use to say don't count your chickens before their all hatched.


The higher the voter turnout the less probability of a Republican winning.

Remember 2012? The Republicans framed Obama as the worst president in history, in fact they made it their goal to make him a one term president but he still won because of a high voter turnout.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join