It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why are you asking questions and then berating people for the answers they give?
When someone wrongs you do you have a subjective or objective moral experience?
I steal your wallet and claim it as mine because I think it has a cool design on it. I do this in front of you. What would you say to me?
How I react would depend on my situation and my mood. What does my reaction have to do an objective moral standard?
The single observable universe couldn't exist without observers?
The universe itself is proof of a system with rules & set applications (IE all planets circle a sun), thus there is a God? (Oversimplified, here's my point)- An unknowable amount of Suns explode & wipe out & unknowable amount of planets & potential life on said planets
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
I ask the questions so that I can get an understanding of their world view. I challenge their answers to press them to think more deeply about their beliefs.
Why do you come to a thread talking about concepts you refuse to acknowledge as a line of thought.
I ask the questions so that I can get an understanding of their world view. I challenge their answers to press them to think more deeply about their beliefs.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: windword
Because I believe its the right thing to do for the bettering of mankind.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: TheArrow
You can't ask questions about something you don't understand....you disproving your own belief by interjecting within the conversation.
So as I kill your family your telling me your moral experience would be to concede that what I am doing is morally correct, even if you don't agree?
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: TheArrow
So, you can only ask questions about things that you do understand?
No but in order to ask any question of God or protrude anywhere past "What is God?" would be breaking the idea of theological noncognivitism.
Unless I am questioning your responses. Which is exactly what I was doing. I don't blame you for not being able to answer my questions about the nature of God, truly I don't, because I don't believe it's a viable concept.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: TheArrow
I have defined God as a philosophical concept to you.
You chose to ignore the meaning of the words in my sentence, and produce multiple strawman arguments in order to make it appear as though you had something of worth to say.