It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: LewsTherinThelamon
No. They want to remove Sodastream machines (you can make your own soda with them) from the cafeteria because they are manufactured in the West Bank. Palestinian families were killed and forced out of area where the manufacturing facilities were built.
The company had defended itself as employing 500 Palestinians, along with 450 Israeli Arab and 350 Israeli Jewish citizens, and insisted that closure for political reasons would benefit no one.
But the BDS statement said: “Any suggestion that SodaStream is employing Palestinians in an illegal Israeli settlement on stolen Palestinian land out of the kindness of its heart is ludicrous.”
The BDS movement, which has made significant strides in recent years, calls for an end to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands conquered in the 1967 war and the dismantling of its West Bank wall; the granting of full equality to Palestinian citizens of Israel; and respect and promotion of the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. Its position on Palestinian refugees is widely interpreted as implying that it does not support a two-state solution to the conflict.
Its statement said: “Even if this announced closure goes ahead, SodaStream will remain implicated in the displacement of Palestinians. Its new Lehavim factory is close to Rahat, a planned township [see footnote] in the Naqab [Negev] desert, where Palestinian Bedouins are being forcefully transferred against their will. Sodastream, as a beneficiary of this plan, is complicit with this violation of human rights.”
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
I hate political correctness.
I don't think this is political correctness. I think it's political bullying. It is a minority inventing influence by acting as the affronted.
If people don't like to use the soda fountains, then they don't need to. I feel that Harvard has lost any credibility by caving in to this stupidity and legitimised future demands. You'll see pork removed from the canteen, followed by segregation of the sexes, because pork offends, as do women.
Regards
All of this behavior is being caused by our ideas political correctness.
When it is a boycott that is protesting against a nation that is breaking international law then it is the correct thing to do.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: Jamie1
SodaStream to move factory out of West Bank Israeli settlement
The company had defended itself as employing 500 Palestinians, along with 450 Israeli Arab and 350 Israeli Jewish citizens, and insisted that closure for political reasons would benefit no one.
But the BDS statement said: “Any suggestion that SodaStream is employing Palestinians in an illegal Israeli settlement on stolen Palestinian land out of the kindness of its heart is ludicrous.”
The BDS movement, which has made significant strides in recent years, calls for an end to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands conquered in the 1967 war and the dismantling of its West Bank wall; the granting of full equality to Palestinian citizens of Israel; and respect and promotion of the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. Its position on Palestinian refugees is widely interpreted as implying that it does not support a two-state solution to the conflict.
Its statement said: “Even if this announced closure goes ahead, SodaStream will remain implicated in the displacement of Palestinians. Its new Lehavim factory is close to Rahat, a planned township [see footnote] in the Naqab [Negev] desert, where Palestinian Bedouins are being forcefully transferred against their will. Sodastream, as a beneficiary of this plan, is complicit with this violation of human rights.”
Emphasis mine
Always more to the story than meets the eye - especially if you're relying on omission of certain facts to make your point
By the way - my right to bitch and moan and be offended is - my right
Same as yours - which you're not shy about using every chance you get, so...
:-)
originally posted by: Iamschist
a reply to: buster2010
This is about a vending machine, not land. Get real.
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
I hate political correctness.
I don't think this is political correctness. I think it's political bullying. It is a minority inventing influence by acting as the affronted.
If people don't like to use the soda fountains, then they don't need to. I feel that Harvard has lost any credibility by caving in to this stupidity and legitimised future demands. You'll see pork removed from the canteen, followed by segregation of the sexes, because pork offends, as do women.
Regards
All of this behavior is being caused by our ideas political correctness.
When it is a boycott that is protesting against a nation that is breaking international law then it is the correct thing to do.
That's not what the article says.
“These machines can be seen as a microaggression to Palestinian students and their families and like the university doesn’t care about Palestinian human rights."
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
I hate political correctness.
I don't think this is political correctness. I think it's political bullying. It is a minority inventing influence by acting as the affronted.
If people don't like to use the soda fountains, then they don't need to. I feel that Harvard has lost any credibility by caving in to this stupidity and legitimised future demands. You'll see pork removed from the canteen, followed by segregation of the sexes, because pork offends, as do women.
Regards
All of this behavior is being caused by our ideas political correctness.
When it is a boycott that is protesting against a nation that is breaking international law then it is the correct thing to do.
Boycotting tyrannical behavior is great, but they want to remove the vending machines on the basis that they could be perceived as offensive to Palestinian students.
That is a little bit stupid.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: buster2010
I'd rather just show them the many Jewish orgs. that support boycotting Israeli products and politics and stand in solidarity with Palestine... there's probably some in that Palestinian Solidarity group at Harvard.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Jamie1
Do you think our government should deem certain protests against the law under penalty of incarceration, based on your opinion of the protest's validity? Do you think the offending entity should be prohibited by law from acquiescing to said protests?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Jamie1
Do you think our government should deem certain protests against the law under penalty of incarceration, based on your opinion of the protest's validity? Do you think the offending entity should be prohibited by law from acquiescing to said protests?
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
I hate political correctness.
I don't think this is political correctness. I think it's political bullying. It is a minority inventing influence by acting as the affronted.
If people don't like to use the soda fountains, then they don't need to. I feel that Harvard has lost any credibility by caving in to this stupidity and legitimised future demands. You'll see pork removed from the canteen, followed by segregation of the sexes, because pork offends, as do women.
Regards
All of this behavior is being caused by our ideas political correctness.
When it is a boycott that is protesting against a nation that is breaking international law then it is the correct thing to do.
That's not what the article says.
Did you miss this part here?
“These machines can be seen as a microaggression to Palestinian students and their families and like the university doesn’t care about Palestinian human rights."
Israel has long been violation Palestinian human rights which is a violation of international law.
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Jamie1
Do you think our government should deem certain protests against the law under penalty of incarceration, based on your opinion of the protest's validity? Do you think the offending entity should be prohibited by law from acquiescing to said protests?
The students are not doing anything themselves to boycott Israel. They're whining and demanding that their University remove a vending machine because it could be seen as offensive.
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Jamie1
Do you think our government should deem certain protests against the law under penalty of incarceration, based on your opinion of the protest's validity? Do you think the offending entity should be prohibited by law from acquiescing to said protests?
lol of course not.
What would make you think that?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Jamie1
Do you think our government should deem certain protests against the law under penalty of incarceration, based on your opinion of the protest's validity? Do you think the offending entity should be prohibited by law from acquiescing to said protests?
lol of course not.
What would make you think that?
So you agree that it's a GOOD thing that these students are allowed to protest, yes? And it's a GOOD thing when protests are allowed to bring about change, yes?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Jamie1
Do you think our government should deem certain protests against the law under penalty of incarceration, based on your opinion of the protest's validity? Do you think the offending entity should be prohibited by law from acquiescing to said protests?
lol of course not.
What would make you think that?
So you agree that it's a GOOD thing that these students are allowed to protest, yes? And it's a GOOD thing when protests are allowed to bring about change, yes?
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: LewsTherinThelamon
This is not a SJW issue. It doesn't matter what the article (posted on a site to build resentment toward academia and the youth graduating from it... which should send off warning bells to anyone with a brain) states is the reason, their job is to make sure that it's supporters are offended (ironic right) and they accomplish this with providing low information. I told you what the actual issue is. It's your choice to remain ignorant or not.