It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: windword
And there is a difference between us. I see love as the balance. Love delights, not ignorance. I delight in my love of HIM. HE delights in HIS love for us.
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: FyreByrd
Just how does this one 'god' above all others come into being? Because a book told you so? Because a person told you so?
We create god(s) not the other way around.
How did life evolve, humanity evolve?
Because a book told you so? Because a person told you so? A scientist?
We create more than just gods, we create ourselves as gods
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: akushla99
HE never said HIS adversary, HE says ours. Might be an important point there to take note of.
The concept of a "creator(s)" doesn't set me off. The man made concept of deities, the divine, gods, and goddessses, however is something else altogether. In addition to that, any faith or belief system that excludes others because they don't believe the same way is elitist, and narrow-minded. Imho.
The second problem I see is that you automatically assume people who believe there is only one truth(which is far more logical than believing they are all true) are narrow minded and elitist. This shows that you enter every conversation with a very high level of bias, and it makes you seem narrow-minded.
originally posted by: akushla99
You just did exactly what I outlined in my post - are you aware of this?...extrapolating a determination outcome based on what you've understood about the word omniscient...
''The existence of free will means that god is not omnipotent or omniscience., because if he was he would have no needs for approval by his creation, and no intentions to test us by giving us free will...." Quote Dr1Akula
It would probably help your POV if you didn't use a flawed rationale (that I'm assuming, isn't yours) to support a resultant circular argument...cos that would be silly... The words of men (women?) you (or anyone else for that matter) being quoted (you did need to make the decision to look-up, copy, paste these verses) does not alter the question (do robots question?) of the veracity of free will.
''You cannot trick a robot (without free will) that is 'programmed', because it has no capacity to distinguish''
The fact that you do not remember being born (or perhaps you do?) brings into question whether you were born at all...but then, none of the documentation relating to this event was recorded by doctors/nurses etc recieving the information through a divine means...
"Isn't our purpose of creation in contrast with free will?" Quote Dr1Akula
NO...except if you want to accept the narrow-cast definitions, i.e. Predestination... In effect...no free will - ZERO RESPONSIBILITY for actions/thoughts...
Free will - responsibility for all action and thought (regardless of whether you remember the nested decision associated or not)...
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
And don't say because a loving God would never allow bad things to happen to us. If God didn't create us with free will then He just would have been making a bunch of copies of himself. By giving us free will we continue the creation process that He started. And free will often leads to bad things happening to us. Its our choice. He's there if we ask Him to be but He doesn't force His will on us.
The first problem I notice with this mindset is if someone hypothetically saw a particular god had a conversation with him/she/it and then wrote about the events he witnessed you would make what psychologist call the fundamental attribution error which is the tendency to overvalue dispositional factors(personality belief ect) and downplay situational factors when understanding others behavior.
The second problem I see is that you automatically assume people who believe there is only one truth(which is far more logical than believing they are all true) are narrow minded and elitist. This shows that you enter every conversation with a very high level of bias, and it makes you seem narrow-minded.
Then dispense with the god part, and the results are the same. People making dumb decisions that they dont remember making, and therefore not taking responsibility for thier predicament...blaming fate
If God didn't create us with free will then He just would have been making a bunch of copies of himself.
I've read the bible (several times) and personally I am stunned that anyone would take it as fact. The inconsistencies, the lies, the contradictions, the horrible megalomanic behavior from the so-called God of Love... I'm not big on gut instincts, but every instinct I have screams that the bible is BS, literally as I was reading it. How can God hold me accountable for not having faith in a religion that I feel was made up and has nothing to do with any real 'truth', for not having faith in Jesus when I believe with all my heart that the people who wrote the bible are full of it and the people who put it together we're not under the influence of divinity whatsoever. Like many atheists to the Abrahamic religions, I can give you dozens of solid, logical examples of why I think these religions are a farce and not the 'truth' at all. I can give you a dozen examples off the top of my head of why the philosophical concept of freewill is total BS.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: MissSmartypants
If God didn't create us with free will then He just would have been making a bunch of copies of himself.
exactly. only one person is allowed to be the center of attention. and the ten commandments make it very clear who that one person is supposed to be.
Now if you were in my shoes with one foot in the grave just what would you do? Would you take a second look at this bible thing or maybe some other better offer? What is the better offer to you?