It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
So have they figured out where the missing heat is ? I know it was suggested that it was hiding in the oceans but so far nobody is able to say for sure if there is extra heat or where it might be because it's not in any observable data but is in the computer models they created to predict what the temps would be in the future . a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
If you haven't gotten it yet, my position is, the climate changes all on it's very own and has since the formation of our galaxy. Yes, let's be responsible with how we treat our environment, but let's not be stupid and so naive to believe we can change the forces of nature. There have been warmer periods in the history of the Earth, yet the travesties we hear about from the AGW people didn't occur.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: Bilk22
I wish you were right and I wrong. And as I said, it's not all, but there are a lot of kids out there that don't know how to get their hands dirty. Peace!
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Bilk22
I think you have a grossly misinformed or hugely assumptive take on our youth.
Yes, there will be some naive or unworked kids there.
My question for you though is why that is even relevant to this discussion?
Again, if this issue is real, pressing, and something that much OLDER global leaders are having to address as we speak, then people showing mass support for action is a good thing, regardless of whether they are young, old, experienced, not experienced, etc.
Your statements carry a new version of the old card "you all are hippies and need to take a shower and get a job. Real people don't have time to address issues like this." It's basically a combination of insult and dismissal without any facts to back it up.
"Only inexperienced or naive youth care about climate change and therefore none of this is important." See how silly that sounds?
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
So have they figured out where the missing heat is ? I know it was suggested that it was hiding in the oceans but so far nobody is able to say for sure if there is extra heat or where it might be because it's not in any observable data but is in the computer models they created to predict what the temps would be in the future . a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Hey man, thanks for the comments.
Well, to my knowledge the last 30 years have been the hottest on average in something like 800 years. It's all about global mean temps, not regional or random places.
originally posted by: Bilk22
If you haven't gotten it yet, my position is, the climate changes all on it's very own and has since the formation of our galaxy. Yes, let's be responsible with how we treat our environment, but let's not be stupid and so naive to believe we can change the forces of nature. There have been warmer periods in the history of the Earth, yet the travesties we hear about from the AGW people didn't occur.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: Bilk22
I wish you were right and I wrong. And as I said, it's not all, but there are a lot of kids out there that don't know how to get their hands dirty. Peace!
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Bilk22
I think you have a grossly misinformed or hugely assumptive take on our youth.
Yes, there will be some naive or unworked kids there.
My question for you though is why that is even relevant to this discussion?
Again, if this issue is real, pressing, and something that much OLDER global leaders are having to address as we speak, then people showing mass support for action is a good thing, regardless of whether they are young, old, experienced, not experienced, etc.
Your statements carry a new version of the old card "you all are hippies and need to take a shower and get a job. Real people don't have time to address issues like this." It's basically a combination of insult and dismissal without any facts to back it up.
"Only inexperienced or naive youth care about climate change and therefore none of this is important." See how silly that sounds?
Realize you and the multitude of others are being manipulated by the powers that be. They are selling you something which they profit from. The whole push for the AWG movement was perpetrated for profit. If you haven't gotten that, well how can you really help?
Your 100k marchers are going to contribute a lot of CO2 tomorrow, with all the yelling and chanting. Maybe it should be a silent march. That should really make a point.
wattsupwiththat.com... This is just one of a few that has to be looked at in order to get a grip on what really might be happening when it comes to scientific studies and the PAL review process a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Obama’s Former Science Official: ‘Climate Science Is Not Settled’
It was presented as shocking evidence of the damage being done by climate change: a species driven to extinction because of a decline in rainfall in its only habitat. Now the “rediscovery” of a species of snail is prompting questions about the role played by the Royal Society, Britain’s most prestigious scientific institution, in raising false alarm over an impact of climate change. –Ben Webster, The Times, 20 September 2014
The Royal Society journal refused to publish the rebuttal, saying it had been “rejected following full peer review”. The journal sent Mr Hambler the reviews of the rebuttal by two anonymous academic referees, who had rejected the criticisms made of Mr Gerlach’s paper. However, the Royal Society admitted this week, after questions from The Times, that the referees who had rejected the rebuttal were the same referees who had approved Mr Gerlach’s paper for publication. The society said it had since changed its policy on reviewing rebuttals… The society has refused to publish the rebuttal because it is seven years old. –Ben Webster, The Times, 20 September 2014
No I don't believe you and the marchers are part of a conspiracy. I'm not sure there's even a "conspiracy" per se, but more of an idea that can be sold, sort of like a religion, and then profited from. It's more of a hoax than a conspiracy.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Now we can talk.
Okay, well, first of all there are entire scientific studies and analyses addressing your point. The data cannot be explained by the natural ebbs and flows of climate. This has been addressed. Second, we really do affect our environment and climate, especially with the massive industrial society we have now.
This whole idea that countless scientists, world leaders, and policy professionals such as myself are all in on a huge hoax really is a bit incredible. This is not because conspiracies don't happen, but because the vast majority of scientists period agree that anthropogenic climate change is happening. Having worked in science and policy, I can tell you that it is highly unlikely that they are all deluded and or in league with the NWO or profiteers.
In fact, the military industrial complex has been fighting any and all climate change and environmental movements for decades precisely because fossil fuels and abject industrialization are INCREDIBLY profitable.
Notice that the US for that reason and others did not sign the Kyoto protocol.
originally posted by: Bilk22
If you haven't gotten it yet, my position is, the climate changes all on it's very own and has since the formation of our galaxy. Yes, let's be responsible with how we treat our environment, but let's not be stupid and so naive to believe we can change the forces of nature. There have been warmer periods in the history of the Earth, yet the travesties we hear about from the AGW people didn't occur.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: Bilk22
I wish you were right and I wrong. And as I said, it's not all, but there are a lot of kids out there that don't know how to get their hands dirty. Peace!
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Bilk22
I think you have a grossly misinformed or hugely assumptive take on our youth.
Yes, there will be some naive or unworked kids there.
My question for you though is why that is even relevant to this discussion?
Again, if this issue is real, pressing, and something that much OLDER global leaders are having to address as we speak, then people showing mass support for action is a good thing, regardless of whether they are young, old, experienced, not experienced, etc.
Your statements carry a new version of the old card "you all are hippies and need to take a shower and get a job. Real people don't have time to address issues like this." It's basically a combination of insult and dismissal without any facts to back it up.
"Only inexperienced or naive youth care about climate change and therefore none of this is important." See how silly that sounds?
Realize you and the multitude of others are being manipulated by the powers that be. They are selling you something which they profit from. The whole push for the AWG movement was perpetrated for profit. If you haven't gotten that, well how can you really help?
Your 100k marchers are going to contribute a lot of CO2 tomorrow, with all the yelling and chanting. Maybe it should be a silent march. That should really make a point.
This whole idea that countless scientists, world leaders, and policy professionals such as myself are all in on a huge hoax really is a bit incredible.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Are representatives from the Carbon Credit exchanges going to be there?
I would think this is in their best interests.
I bet they bring plenty of alka-seltzers.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
The goal is to show mass support for rigorous action by national and global leaders to address climate change mitigation and adaptation.
originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
The goal is to show mass support for rigorous action by national and global leaders to address climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Could you elaborate on which specific rigorous actions the marchers are endorsing?
I would support a moratorium on rainforest deforestation. The UN can't seem to stop genocides, how are they going to stop people from cutting down trees?
I'd like to see China implement the same sort of emission control standards that the US uses. If China refuses, can the UN force China to comply?
Can the UN take any real action to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere?
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
Scientific studies you say .Well here is some reality about scientific studies you may not be aware of .
wattsupwiththat.com... This is just one of a few that has to be looked at in order to get a grip on what really might be happening when it comes to scientific studies and the PAL review process a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Obama’s Former Science Official: ‘Climate Science Is Not Settled’
It was presented as shocking evidence of the damage being done by climate change: a species driven to extinction because of a decline in rainfall in its only habitat. Now the “rediscovery” of a species of snail is prompting questions about the role played by the Royal Society, Britain’s most prestigious scientific institution, in raising false alarm over an impact of climate change. –Ben Webster, The Times, 20 September 2014
The Royal Society journal refused to publish the rebuttal, saying it had been “rejected following full peer review”. The journal sent Mr Hambler the reviews of the rebuttal by two anonymous academic referees, who had rejected the criticisms made of Mr Gerlach’s paper. However, the Royal Society admitted this week, after questions from The Times, that the referees who had rejected the rebuttal were the same referees who had approved Mr Gerlach’s paper for publication. The society said it had since changed its policy on reviewing rebuttals… The society has refused to publish the rebuttal because it is seven years old. –Ben Webster, The Times, 20 September 2014
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
This whole idea that countless scientists, world leaders, and policy professionals such as myself are all in on a huge hoax really is a bit incredible.
...uhm ?
Of course lots of governments are wanting to have something with which they can slap taxes on everything as much as they want.
originally posted by: NthOther
Why are you trying to convince "world leaders" to do something about it? The only reason we have this problem is because people want their stupid s#. They want their big house, their two cars, their 4.5 televisions/computers, iPhone, iTablet, iWatch, big-budget movies and cheeseburgers on every street corner 24/7.
So they gave it to us. You (the general "you", not specific) are the ones consuming. You are the ones who demand mass agriculture. You are the ones who think modern technological health care is a right. You are the ones who expect to be able to fly across the continent just to go shopping, and you are the ones who legitimize leaders who wage war to keep all of this stupid s# running.
In other words, the problem does not lie with world leaders. The problem is us--greedy, covetous, and all the more easily manipulated because of it. Accustomed to luxury. Totally complacent. Helpless in our own natural environment. Unless you're prepared to live without running water and like it, I don't want to hear about "concern for the planet" anymore.
Faux environmentalism.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Just conversations, I think about this and other serious issues all the time and talk about them in an age appropriate manner of course. At your sons age, if you're bringing him ( my son has gone to marches and protests with me before, it's best to stay on the outskirts by the way, and watch the cops movements and behaviors and be ready to duck out), it's best to keep it simple... that you want to make sure that the planet is healthy, is true and simple enough.
My son is 15 tomorrow and anything Mom is into can't be cool, I'm sure that will change... it did for me with my mom.
Thanks for the birthday wishes for him.
originally posted by: NthOther
Why are you trying to convince "world leaders" to do something about it? The only reason we have this problem is because people want their stupid s#. They want their big house, their two cars, their 4.5 televisions/computers, iPhone, iTablet, iWatch, big-budget movies and cheeseburgers on every street corner 24/7.
So they gave it to us. You (the general "you", not specific) are the ones consuming. You are the ones who demand mass agriculture. You are the ones who think modern technological health care is a right. You are the ones who expect to be able to fly across the continent just to go shopping, and you are the ones who legitimize leaders who wage war to keep all of this stupid s# running.
In other words, the problem does not lie with world leaders. The problem is us--greedy, covetous, and all the more easily manipulated because of it. Accustomed to luxury. Totally complacent. Helpless in our own natural environment. Unless you're prepared to live without running water and like it, I don't want to hear about "concern for the planet" anymore.
Faux environmentalism.
It is put together by The Climate Group, which includes business and government organizations focusing on the rapid scale-up of low carbon energy and technology.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
As to your last point, that is an extreme view.