a reply to: arpgme
It actually is legal, but people didn't stand up against the criminals, the gangsters at the top and it takes a strong unity, because they pick off
one by one and lock them, unlawfully, away.
All things, laws, ordinances, statutes, bills, etc, that are written up, enacted, that violate basic sovereign rights, common law and the
constitution, are NULL and VOID at conception. They don't exist. What does exist is a criminal empowered group that dominates everyone and enforces
unlawful, voided legislation and win by power and dominance. And people's weaponized opinions that allow this to happen. For example, Jones over
there may think its OK to enact a law that makes it illegal to eat apples, and supports the felons that are writing up a bill to stop you from eating
apples, BUT, in reality, common law and the constitution protects even individuals who are aware, for unless they're directly harming another, or its
a joint issue that is important enough for someone to agree to give up rights, (and they can't just take that in many of the instances where they
have, ie drugs and front yard gardens, livestock, etc), the individual's rights are protected and sovereign even if they're a minority of 1.
However, bullies and bad guys force criminal behaviors and laws.
But the law that makes this illegal is an unlawful voided one.
And that by the way, I gleaned from a real constitutional lawyer.
Even carrying forth and carrying out a void unlawful law, like a police officer or a social worker, etc, is committing a crime.
Unfortunately, this world runs on two things: Crimes against all souls, criminal legislature and laws, and a lack of intelligence and volunteering of
time in communities by its citizens to counter all of this, so weaponized opinions drop away due to real understanding and education, that the
citizens have to give themselves because the criminals at the top never will.
By the way, when these voided and therefore non existent, "laws" came into effect, the thirties was on and people were down on their knees, millions
even dying from starvation.
They seem to time things right.
edit to add: Another example, fine tuning it. Drinking and driving is dangerous and so naturally some compromise law may be needed along with speed
limits, but the cut off has to be reasonable not intolerant, because we have the power not them and they don't have any fascist rights, so they need
to be pretty lenient in how they do things. Driver's liscenses, why? You bought the vehicle why do you need a liscense to drive? Um null and void!
Insurance and the cost of covering injury and damage, I can see that, but not the liscense plates. If they want some little symbols to pick out a
criminal vehicle it should come with the car then, not something you have to purchase. They have no right to prohibit travel and that is not
something that is actually defined constitutionally. The constitution is not something that gives you a few rights. Its a box for them, we have
infinite rights outside it.
edit on 21-9-2014 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)