It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: punkinworks10
originally posted by: crayzeed
Does it not make anyone wonder why the established archaeologists always portray Australia of being populated from the Pacific and latterly from Europe. Yet what sticks out like a sore thumb is the virtually small island hops through Indonesia or New Guinea which is totally ignored. So they say the aborigines spread from South America through the Pacific islands, across vast oceanic distances. The same for the Europeans, crossing the Indian ocean or the Pacific. Yet from the north of Australia there is virtually a land bridge.
?????? Australians from south America, that's a
new one. That "ignored " island hopping through Indonesia, is the accepted model for human dispersion into Australia and Tasmania.
No seriously considered austrailians to have come from south America.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
This may be a hoax but the Native Australian people may have lived there for up to 60.000 years and there is evidence of vast trade network's stretching right across the continent, just because these people did not build collumned palaces does not mean there civilization was primitive, they survived longer than any other culture in the world with little change over that time period