It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Axial Leader
There is something I am not clear about -- that doesn't make sense to me.
Failure to comply with a lawful order order from a Federal officer
originally posted by: VoidHawk
originally posted by: Axial Leader
There is something I am not clear about -- that doesn't make sense to me.
Failure to comply with a lawful order order from a Federal officer
I think the whole point is its NOT a lawful order. They just make you believe it is.
Is it wrong to fool people?
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
a reply to: ElOmen
Because human trafficking doesn't exist, right?
Because drug trafficking doesn't exist, right?
Because arms trafficking doesn't exist, right?
Because people don't drink or drive under dangerous intoxicants, correct?
Because everyone who steps foot in this Country has Her best interests at heart, correct?
Because no one would ever do anything illegal in this Great Nation, am I reading this clearly?
Therefore, there should be no checkpoints.....yeah.....wow....ok....gotcha.
Whatever water supply you're drinking from, I would really appreciate a bottle.
originally posted by: centhwevir1979
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
a reply to: ElOmen
Because human trafficking doesn't exist, right?
Because drug trafficking doesn't exist, right?
Because arms trafficking doesn't exist, right?
The worst offenders on the grandest scale are the ones mandating the use of the checkpoints in the first place. Consider that?
originally posted by: ElOmen
a reply to: kauskau
i believe that answering that simple question affects you even at a metaphysical/spiritual level. you are attatching yourself to something an idea created by man. Thats just what my head tells me.
Internal checkpoints have also been criticized for violating the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution which prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures", although The United States v. Martinez-Fuerte has affirmed their constitutionality.
The U.S. Border Patrol has stated: "although motorists are not legally required to answer the questions ‘are you a U.S. citizen and where are you headed,’ they will not be allowed to proceed until the inspecting agent is satisfied that the occupants of vehicles traveling through the checkpoint are legally present in the U.S."
originally posted by: jimmyx
please someone try this now in 2014....and tell us how it turned out....actually the LEO's in the video seemed to be fairly mild-mannered...I wonder if he was a black or brown guy driving a crappy car, he would have been treated the same way.
Do not EVER try to out smart the officer and ask for a Probable Cause. You'll just agitate him.
originally posted by: coastlinekid
a reply to: VoidHawk
You are trying to explain to a sheep that he is a sheep... most sheep don't know they are sheep ...that is what makes them sheep...