It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
First the disclaimers: While I do work for NASA, I do not speak for them. They employ me for my professional capabilities and on occasion my professional opinion. Nothing I say should ever be construed as anything other than my personal opinion. As a NASA employee I am allowed and often times encouraged to say what I think. This and the exceptional people I get to work with every day are what make NASA great and a great place to work
As for what people are trying to read into this video, specifically my use of the word “demonstrated”, it is my professional opinion that the production of excess energy has been demonstrated when the results of the last 20+ years of experimentation are evaluated. There has been a lot of work done in the past 20+ years. When considered in aggregate I believe excess power has been demonstrated. I did not say, reliable, useful, commercially viable, or controllable.
Future test plans include independent verification and validation at other test facilities.
originally posted by: Mary Rose
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Are you implying that Bearden is "kook science"?
originally posted by: Mary Rose
"Engines and Templates: Correcting Effects Confused as Causes"
Foreword
Abstract
Introduction
Extended Electrodynamics Engineers General Relativity
The Notion of Space
The Notion of Time in Physics
Working in a General-Relativity-Based Unified Field Theory
Time-Reversal and Pumping
4-Space Pumping and Time-Reversal of Mass
Deviating the Time-Pumped Mass from Returning to Its Past Condition
Physical Engines and the New "Signal Wave" Input
Biological Dedifferentiation and Redifferentiation
The Cellular Regenerative System Pumps Damaged Cells in the Time Domain
Becker Was Suppressed for His Achievements and Courage
The Immune System Heals Nothing
The Unsuspected Dynamics of the "Scalar" EM Potential
Effect Wave Versus Causal Wave
How the Effect Wave Came to Be Confused as the Causal Wave
Only a Subset of Maxwell's Theory Was Selected and Retained
Dualizing the "Field" Concept
Extremely Limited Physics Knowledge At the Time
Whittaker's Decomposition Shows the Primacy of Longitudinal EM Waves
The Quiescent Vacuum as Spacetime and as a Scalar Potential
Requirement for Hidden Order and Its Implications
Observation/Detection Is a d/dt Operator
Implications for Electrodynamics
O(3) Electrodynamics Corrects the Duality Error
Reconsidering Whittaker's Decomposition
The Results of Reinterpreting Whittaker Decomposition
A More Primary 4-Symmetry in EM Energy Flow
Giant Negentropy
Present Quantum and Classical EM Models Grossly Violate Energy Conservation
Return to Time-Domain Pumping
Extending Nonlinear Phase Conjugate Optics
This Approach Extends the Template Approach in Nanotechnology
Reinterpretation of the "Lone" 3-space Longitudinal EM Wave
Pumping with Longitudinal EM Waves Accomplishes Time-Domain Pumping
Two Components of the Resident Engine and of the Generated Amplified Antiengine
The Prioré Procedure and Its Active Mechanism
Internal, Infolded EM Longitudinal Waves Inside Ordinary EM Entities
Example of Russian Weaponization
The Subspace of Infolded EM Inside Conventional EM Entities
The Biophysical Mechanism Utilized Empirically in Homeopathy
Application in Reverse for Healing
Energetics Causes Arise and Act from the Local Spacetime In Which the Target is Embedded
An Example: Russian Microwave Radiation of U.S. Embassy Personnel in Moscow
The Prioré Mechanism: Amplified Damage-Specific Antiengines
This Is the Logical "Next Great Extension" to Mechanical Nanotechnology Templating
An Example: Complete and Ready Cure of AIDS Would Be Possible
Rejuvenation of the Aged Is Practicable
Simplifying and Extending Prioré's Process
Briefing and Informal Proposal Sent to DoD and Other Government Agencies
The Major Present Defensive Response Is Triage
How Serious Is the Threat, Really?
The Need for Action
www.cheniere.org...
if it's the same Bearden i am thinking of he is right up there with richard hoagland. i was trying to be polite. now being on the fringe does not mean being incorrect. it means you need extraordinary levels of evidence to prove your theory or contention is correct to more mainstream science, peer review and so on.
originally posted by: Mary Rose
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Are you implying that Bearden is "kook science"?
originally posted by: Mary Rose
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Putting all of that aside, are you capable of reading a document addressing issues in physics that are on record from textbooks and scientific papers - historically on record from bona fide physicists and authors - following along the train of thought and reasoning of said document, and then analyzing it?
reinterpreting and extending Whittaker's 1903 decomposition of the scalar potential (as between the ends of a dipole) and by treating the charge with its clustered virtual charges of opposite sign as a set of composite dipoles.
www.cheniere.org...
Most electrodynamicists have taken a pragmatic approach to the "duality of the field concept" and simply "bypassed" that tough problem. . . . Since observation is a d/dt operator, actually the cause field has to differ in dimensionality by the unit of time.
www.cheniere.org...
This informal paper is certainly not intended to be the "definitive statement" on the matter! Instead, it is intended to merely point the way to a deeper consideration of the field, and to its present erratic and erroneous usage in a dualistic manner, and to how to solve the problem.
We use a simple "discriminating" notion: We use "observation" as a process occurring in ongoing spacetime, involving a cause acting on (interacting with) a previously observed effect, generating a change (effect) in that previously observed effect. Whenever one says the word "effect," one assumes (usually unconsciously) a continual iteration of observation. In short, we assume the continual iterative production of effects, each rigorously static and frozen, much like the frames of a movie film. The "progress of change" is added by perception, by our mind's normal operation which is innate. On the other hand, we point out the assumption, in that notion of continual iterative observations, of "time-forward" motion through time. In a time-reversed situation, the exact opposite happens, and we may think of the observation interaction as reversed in direction in the iteration of the d/dt operator. . . .
www.cheniere.org...
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Mary time forward or backwards is possible, but to do that you must first enter the space where there is no time and in this place humans cannot survive and maybe neither can machines of any sort that we know of
originally posted by: Mary Rose
a reply to: Nochzwei
Bearden's paper is on correcting effects confused as causes - that the effect of force is confused as a cause.
And that "field" is assumed to be cause and "particle" is assumed to be effect.
He mentions that Feynman said we can't define "force."
And that Feynman and Wheeler said the force field only exists where charged mass is interacting; therefore, it cannot exist in empty space.
And that they also did not include mass as a component of force.
Additionally, that they tried to correct electrodynamics with an EM model based on absorber theory, but the fields in the theory had a double meaning.
Bearden then points out that in essence, the field, an effect, has been presented in physics as its own cause.
Lol fun? Nasa or any similar entity will not entertain you, if they know that you are breaking the laws of physics and to do that, it will be considered taking a step out of line and people get bumped off for doing that.
originally posted by: magnecore
Are there any garage type research groups to get involved with? The device doesnt seem that difficult to build, sure would be fun to be pioneering space drive!