NASA Confirms New EM Thruster Violates Laws Of Conservation

page: 22
148
<< 19  20  21   >>

log in

join

posted on May, 2 2015 @ 02:18 AM
link   
If this really works .. let's make this one happen for real!



edit on 2-5-2015 by flyandi because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 2 2015 @ 06:59 AM
link   
WRT to the thread title: Crtics say it violates COE but the researchers say it doesn't because of their theory of the way it works obeys conservation. They say like a sailboat, it is an open system and thrust does not magically appear but has a hidden source.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 01:46 PM
link   
Here's the latest update for all the naysayers:



A group at NASA’s Johnson Space Center has successfully tested an electromagnetic (EM) propulsion drive in a vacuum – a major breakthrough for a multi-year international effort comprising several competing research teams. Thrust measurements of the EM Drive defy classical physics’ expectations that such a closed (microwave) cavity should be unusable for space propulsion because of the law of conservation of momentum.


So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.



posted on May, 5 2015 @ 03:55 PM
link   
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

This is amazing stuff.


Various hypotheses and theories have been proposed explaining the underlying physics for how the EmDrive and related designs might be producing thrust. Shawyer claims that thrust is caused by a radiation pressure imbalance between the two faces of the cavity caused by the action of group velocity in different frames of reference within the framework of special relativity.[26] Yang from NWPU calculated the net force/thrust using classical electromagnetism.[12] Harold G. "Sonny" White, who investigates field propulsion at Eagleworks, NASA's Advanced Propulsion Physics Laboratory, speculated that such resonant cavities may operate by creating a virtual plasma toroid that could realize net thrust using magnetohydrodynamic forces acting upon quantum vacuum fluctuations.[27] Likewise, the paper describing the Eagleworks test of the Cannae drive referred to a possible interaction with a so-called "quantum vacuum virtual plasma".[14] This reference has been criticized by mathematical physicists John Baez and Sean M. Carroll because in the standard description of vacuum fluctuations, virtual particles do not behave as a plasma.[21][28][29]


en.wikipedia.org...

Cheers.



posted on May, 6 2015 @ 01:59 AM
link   
Now that we have something that may work, so watch the MS conjure up some stuff and pin the result as confirmation of Einstein's GR. Lol.
a reply to: Anaana





new topics

top topics
 
148
<< 19  20  21   >>

log in

join