Celebrity Porn Conspiracy

I am starting to think that when celebrities sell sex, ie with porn films, or naked photos, or via the media they take profession in that its acceptable. . It is starting to get on my nerves I cannot switch on the TV without avoiding it and often times my whole family and I am appalled. Of course an additional worry is how to protect children from this. Its not that were old fashioned . Its just we wouldn't want to see our neighbours in such compromising positions... and if we did they may just be in trouble particulary if they did this kind of thing in a very public place, and yet celebrities are all about doing it publically!

So why is it legal to see celebrities in these such positions?

I think there is a double standard here .

Take for example Madonna and her sex book, posing in an erotic position with a dog. And yet... if an ordinary person did this on the street some where they would be locked up. And this such material can make its way into the unsuspecting persons life or view via media or people spreading this type of material about.

Are their fans blinded? Or maybe just brainwashed? I cant work out what's happening and why such double standards exist.

Or could this be a silent revolution against Christian old fashioned ideas on sexuality?

Aside from the typos that make your thoughts hard to understand, your thoughts are hard to understand.

Is anyone shoving their hoo-haas in you or your kiddies faces? Is porn or celeb nip slips dancing in the air in front of you?

Is your underlying feeling that sex is dirty coloring all your thoughts? What's the deal...?

originally posted by: FreedomEntered

So why is it legal to see celebrities in these such positions?
.......
I think there is a double standard here .
.......
Or could this be a silent revolution against Christian old fashioned ideas on sexuality?

Good thread, Flag and Star.
It's unfortunately one of the planks of that Manifesto to erode our
morals, and it seems to be working well. With immorality legalized
somehow, it becomes elementary to make dissent to it illegal.
PC and discrimination are some big tools, and I'm as appalled as you
are that it's getting more blatant and "mainstream" every year.

I threw out my TV almost five years ago, and even that recently
would never have seen some of even the commercials much less
'filler' on the broadcast channel. Cable's starting to turn hardcore.
I've seen it all twice by now, but that doesn't mean it's appro-
priate for children.
Their innocence and childhood itself is being ripped from them.
For some older and more experienced it's ok.. I'm too old to forget
what happened elsewhere with this.

a reply to: Baddogma

I don't think sex is dirty no. I am just asking that we wouldn't tolerate it if say a " teacher" or a " neighbour" exposed themselves as some celebrities do... so why do we tolerate it from celebrities?

a reply to: FreedomEntered

I think people should be allowed to do what they want. If that happens to include posing in sexually compromising positions with either themselves or other consenting adults then, simply put, it is their prerogative.

I do, however, understand that the media is quite full of racy material but you certainly are not exposed to anything too overtly depraved. Indeed, you are more likely to see violence than sex. Then again it is all dependent on which channels and programs one chooses to view. For instance, you are far more likely to encounter full frontal nudity on HBO than, say, CBS.

Basically, if you have a problem with what a channel or program is showing, simply do not view that channel or program. There are plenty of wholesome Christian networks that would seem more likely to provide you and your family with a pleasurable viewing experience.

a reply to: derfreebie

Yeah, I am tempted to throw the TV out for obvious reasons - children being the primary one. I think the way especially women are sold in music today is really " robot" or " pole dancer" and I don't know why this is happening. I would rather not know why to be honest. I just feel that its acceptable maybe because their famous but their fans support them no matter what they do, which is interesting.

I don't mind what they do behind closed doors but they behave as if EVERYONE wants to see everything about them. By regulary exposing themselves for huge amounts of cash no doubt. But on the contrary not everyone does want to see it and I am far from a prude I just feel there has to be some " brainwashing " and where its headed to..

I feel like there is an evident agenda from media outlets like Disney. just take Miley Cyrus for example, little tweens watched her disney shows now follow her music tours and they are all out of control. its craziness, I feel like disney has always embued hidden sexual innuendo in the cartoons and animated movies. I was just watching the will smith animated disney where hes a fish, and the fish start dancing all sexually and pumping their pelvis'. Just made me think, like when does that become ok, at what age do you want your children to see dancing with pelvic thrusts!!? its seems todays media even for toddlers has become controversial in a way.

originally posted by: FreedomEntered
a reply to: Baddogma

I don't think sex is dirty no. I am just asking that we wouldn't tolerate it if say a " teacher" or a " neighbour" exposed themselves as some celebrities do... so why do we tolerate it from celebrities?

If that particular individual were exposing themselves and, through digital media, distributing said exposures among a community of like minded individuals, then what is the problem? As long as all parties involved are consenting adults the matter is surely a non-issue.

I could care less if it were the librarians, teachers, police (firemen fund raising calendars come to mind) or the waitress at the local waffle house. It is their prerogative.

I think there is an agenda, but I don't know what it is for exactly. Or why people would want to see it.

I guess any fan would want to see the porn or sex book of their favourite celebrity out of natural curiousity.

But then they turn it around and call it ART and yet if it were someone a lot less famous they would be ridiculed for it completely and just be called a total" slut or loser". And there would be immediate concern for all the vulnerable people around them, ie children.

Its not just kids, teens it can effect its also adults. For example I am just sensitive that way. Unless its something I want to seek out to see I do find it offensive if people are pushing an overtly sexual agenda into my face when I am simply a stranger to them . And most of life isn't about that anyway its about more important things surely?.. So its pointless over done in my view.

Can you close your eyes, change the channel, move to a different web page?
Sex is a part of life, sexuality is a part of being human.
If you don't like it or are offended by it then simply don't look .

It's not just celebrities either..it would take you about 3 seconds to find billions of amateur clips on the web.

I don't like country or rap music so rather then complain about them or get annoyed with it I simply don't listen to them because their are millions of people that do like those styles and it is not my place to take away what someone else enjoys....

originally posted by: FreedomEntered
a reply to: Baddogma
I am just asking that we wouldn't tolerate it if say a " teacher" or a " neighbour" exposed themselves as some celebrities do... so why do we tolerate it from celebrities?

Supposedly, these are artists creating art. Yeah, whatever. Though role models, luckily we don't tolerate celebrities becoming teachers etc.

The worst type of celebrity "sex" is when unscrupulous "powers" place electronic surveillance devices in places of residence and then use the information to try to "blackmail" people. Here is a hint, anytime you criticize the oil industry, argue for anthropogenic climate change, or argue for the existence of ETS then they start placing these devices everywhere.

If there are any people devoid of morals it is those who no longer have a rational justification for their ideology and hence have to resort to blackmail and threats of violence.

a reply to: opethPA

Once you've seen that . That's it. I think they should up the bar a bit. And quit making it seem like its " art" or " cool" or and just be honest that they are selling sex for profit and then perhaps certain bans could take place.

Kids and teens are more exposed to it than me, due to their watching this pop music constantly and it teaches them that its the norm.

It isn't the norm, its not even sex, its just all put on for the videos, cameras or what ever else, complete vanity projects.

Its not natural that's the point if it were it would be 10000 times better.

a reply to: nrd101

You are absolutely correct.

Disney is a vile corporation. And while I fully support consenting adults behaving as they like, sexually and otherwise, I implore all parents to pull the plug on ALL Disney products and motion pictures.

This is due, mainly, to my belief that Disney uses what essentially boils down to mind controlled Beta alters (Miley Cyrus) and subliminal suggestions in their programing. These systems are designed to cause over-sexualization of young children.

origins and techniques of Monarch mind control

Monarch Programming is a method of mind control used by numerous organizations for covert purposes. It is a continuation of project MK-ULTRA, a mind-control program developed by the CIA, and tested on the military and civilians. The methods are astonishingly sadistic (its entire purpose is to traumatize the victim) and the expected results are horrifying: The creation of a mind-controlled slave who can be triggered at anytime to perform any action required by the handler. While mass media ignores this issue, over 2 million Americans have gone through the horrors of this program. This article looks at the origins of Monarch programming and some of its methods and symbolism.

This is all highly speculative of course and should be personally researched if one is interested. I have done a good deal of research on the subject and find it very interesting yet infinitely disturbing.

Monarch programming is a mind-control technique comprising elements of Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) and Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD). It utilizes a combination of psychology, neuroscience and occult rituals to create within the slaves an alter persona that can be triggered and programmed by the handlers. Monarch slaves are used by several organizations connected with the world elite in fields such as the military, sex slavery and the entertainment industry. This article will look at the origins of Monarch programming, its techniques and its symbolism.

In my opinion this is the technique used by Disney to create their beta "cat" alters like Miley and others. They use TBMC (trauma based mind control) to essentially break down the walls of a young mind and in so doing splinter that individuals mind often causing MPD (multiple personality disorder) and DID (dissociative identity disorder) they (the handlers) can then, through even more trauma, program specific personalities or "alters" (sometimes spelled "altars") to perform specific tasks, performing a musical concert for instance. Often they are programmed to do far more depraved things which I will not go into here.

In summary, keep Disney out of your home and away from your kids. Also, research, research, research and most importantly, don't take my word for it.

What gets me is when nobodies do it. They are seen as the lowest of the low.
And yet a celebrity does it and that's " genius" . That's great marketing.

And sure enough fans lap it up and pay in tons.. what for?

I guess as I have never been that celebrity star struck I have never understood the logic.

a reply to: FreedomEntered

Not finding the value in it or not understanding the motivation behind something doesn't mean that it isn't art. It's the fickle side of the first amendment, you have to suck it up and deal with expression that you don't necessarily agree with if you want to be able to enjoy your own rights and express your disgust in lovely forums such as this.

a reply to: CagliostroTheGreat

But are the people in the industry them selves aware of what's happening or are they following orders of some kind?

And if it does promote the over sexuality of teenagers then why isn't that being addressed anyone anywhere? What I am asking is what is the power behind in the throne ..

a reply to: peter vlar

Freedom or speech and freedom of expression doesn't happen with the ordinary person though.

So therefore it really does not exist. The elite or very wealthy are the only ones who get away with this kind of thing on such an international level.

originally posted by: FreedomEntered
Freedom or speech and freedom of expression doesn't happen with the ordinary person though.

Really ?

I can go say anything I want right now and do anything I want..
As a matter of fact I am listening to exactly what I want in the way I want for how long I want before going to bed when I want.
All after just planning the vacation I have wanted to take for a long time.

So tell me again how freedom of speech and freedom of expression doesn't happen to the ordinary person.