Celebrity Porn Conspiracy

a reply to: FreedomEntered

Good question.

The simple answer is: no one knows for sure. We call them the Illuminati, Globalists, The Elite. Who knows. Most of the time when a researcher exposes this they are simply brushed aside as "the lunatic fringe" and maybe they are.

As for awareness in the industry, I would say that those at the top certainly must know they are using mind controlled Monarch slaves. As for the victims, I would say that they probably realize something is terribly wrong but they have absolutely no power to find out what or begin taking steps to change their circumstances. Though there are those who make claims to have "broken" their programming.

a reply to: opethPA

Try even half of the things celebrities do and get away with and see where it gets you.

I am not speaking about ordinary behaviours and ordinary things that people do on a daily basis.
I am saying go into the streets flashing your private parts and you will be behind bars before you know it. And yet if a celebrity does this its simply seen as acceptable/ground breaking even and really really cool dude!

originally posted by: FreedomEntered
a reply to: peter vlar

Freedom or speech and freedom of expression doesn't happen with the ordinary person though.

So therefore it really does not exist. The elite or very wealthy are the only ones who get away with this kind of thing on such an international level.

If you really believe that you've never stepped foot inside an art school or collegiate level art program let alone a museum. If your reaction to what you see on your television and on the internet is this extreme then you would likely vomit or toss yourself off of a rather high building if you saw the photo work I did in the late 90's. They make bondage models blush.

originally posted by: FreedomEntered
a reply to: opethPA

Try even half of the things celebrities do and get away with and see where it gets you.

I am not speaking about ordinary behaviours and ordinary things that people do on a daily basis.
I am saying go into the streets flashing your private parts and you will be behind bars before you know it. And yet if a celebrity does this its simply seen as acceptable/ground breaking even and really really cool dude!

One name for you. Spencer Tunick

a reply to: peter vlar

So you are saying this highly sexualised culture that teenagers today live in is normal and okay?
Its Art?

originally posted by: FreedomEntered
Try even half of the things celebrities do and get away with and see where it gets you.

Why, I dont need celebrity for my career and they do.

I pretty much don't care about things I don't care about and the fact that I can't act like a celebrity is near the tops of that list. On top of that I can walk down a street of the city I live and see drunk idiots acting drunk on the weekend doing everything from urinating, having sex , fighting , insert some other action here and Delta Force does not swoop down arresting them.

a reply to: peter vlar

A kim kardashian porn vid and an art museum are two different things. What I am saying is celebrities can sell off the cheap sex stunts they do by saying its art because everyone will buy into 90% of what they do.

I am saying if what she is doing is the new art then where is this leading to? I don't think I really want the answer to this.

a reply to: FreedomEntered

I'm saying that as parents it is OUR job to know and monitor what our children are being exposed to. What celebrities do, what artists do, what your kids or my neighbors kids do... None of it is my concern. My kids are my concern and their degree of access will be dictated by my morals and standards as opposed to someone in DC or a random stranger on the internet. In my home nudity or sexuality isn't made to be gross or shameful. It's a part of human nature and life and should be celebrated. At the end if the day though what is appropriate is my decision and what access my kids have to media is as well.

a reply to: peter vlar

I understand that different folks different strokes. And Id say the more liberal ideas are totally accepted now a days about sexuality anyway. However, I am saying for those who don't want to be exposed to it its near impossible not to be. Firstly there is the over zealous advertisement of these people, the marketing and then its packaged as " super cool" and fed out for major bucks.


All for an agenda obviously.

Different strokes for different folks ..
There is nothing wrong with or obscene about the human body .. well almost nothing fat women in thongs are the stuff nightmares are made of ..
Never ceases to amaze me .. in the west they can show blood .. guts and gore nobody bats an eye .. show a little T&A and theyre getting out the torches and pitchforks ..
Would much rather see T&A than blood.. guts and gore ..

a reply to: FreedomEntered

The Kim K sex tape is, in this ones humble opinion, most certainly not art. It is a trashy sex tape likely shot in a hotel room.

That is not to say, however, that erotica, indeed, sex, cannot be art. There are plenty of examples of sex as art.

To address your point regarding the public's willingness to pay to view only celebrity porn or only "silicone valley" porn, well, those sexually explicit chat sites are doing quite well for themselves aren't they? That is just people+people, no celebs involved. People like porn, people like sex and they pay for it constantly.

So, your point regarding celebrity porn is, in my opinion, quite moot.

a reply to: FreedomEntered


Honestly in the grand scheme if things, this seems like one if the more benign complaints or issues that need to he at the forefront when it comes to out children. I do just fine keeping my kids as oblivious as possible without lying to them or making things gross or shameful like my parents presented things to me. Perhaps you should be more focused on imparting good morals and giving a good education to your kids so that when they are confronted with imagery you disapprove of that they will be able to make the right decision on their own. Good patenting goes much farther than censorship or prohibition.

a reply to: Expat888

Brilliant point, pat, and something I touched on in my first reply. Watch t.v., go ahead I'll wait...

See? There is far more violence than sex! In my opinion a little skin is far less harmful to the developing mind than seeing the face of some poor sap caved in by a blunt instrument. Yet our culture, here in the west, glorifies violent behavior more so than a little promiscuity.

Really it is all about sanitizing what your kids see. When they get older it will become more difficult, yes, but it is up to you as an adult and responsible parent to properly inform your child with regards to hoe one should implement such behaviors in a social environment. Sex and violence, both. In my opinion these two aspects of the human condition hold the most sway over development and understand as well as proper social etiquette.

Yes absolutely, knowing what one should show and should not well again I've said its actually impossible unless one literally lives in a community of prudes.

Then its tons easier.

However I still believe it is destroying the innocence of so many, its the silent abuse of teenagers and not only teenagers but also it gives adults who know there are things of greater importance a sense of sadness that this mass programming and brainwash is being administered so readily and without anyone challenging it.

Those who do challenge it are now regarded as backwards and too prudish/suppressive even.

a reply to: CagliostroTheGreat

Violence is also conditioning people to accept violence and sure enough you do find billions of people today in this modern world distancing themselves from those who are on the receiving end of violence, they kind of blank it, go into a state of helplessness and don't even consider the differences they can make.

The violence I didn't grow up with, not on tv ...we only had a few channels anyway.

In fact if you scratch the surface and go a little deeper many people will reason that those others deserved the violence and so sexual violence, which is exposing themselves to others who don't want it, also goes ignored too.

a reply to: FreedomEntered

You make it sound like this is something that's been going on for 5-10 years when I was exposed to just as much blatant sexuality growing up in the 80's. Certainly there are some differences as there was no internet for the average person back then but aside from speed of delivery and lower cost I do t think the access is a whole lot higher now than it has been since the mid 60's

a reply to: CagliostroTheGreat

Thanks.. though no tv out here in boonieland .. barely get signal on my tab3 ..
Often think its why they have so many problems in western countries far too sexually repressed and all that frustration builds up leading to violence ..
Look at history even ancient greeks would abstain from sex days if not months before going into battle so that they could fight better.. even today theres boxers who abstain from sex before fights ..

You all covering the parental responsibility angle so am go grab coffee ..

originally posted by: FreedomEntered
So why is it legal to see celebrities in these such positions?

I think there is a double standard here .

Take for example Madonna and her sex book, posing in an erotic position with a dog. And yet... if an ordinary person did this on the street some where they would be locked up.

No offense but are you kidding? There is an entire pornography industry of ordinary people doing just this.

This isnt about sex being put in front of kids or religious people. It's about this weird uncomfortably about sex here in America. It's shame and it is meant to make people feel insecure and it works.

a reply to: underduck

Nothing uncomfortable about sex or there wouldn't be an over population issue.

a reply to: Expat888

That's a point I think its also linked in with violence.. too much sex too much violence its out of control really. Just no one seems to want to face it.