It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Celebrity Porn Conspiracy

page: 3
7
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 25 2014 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: opethPA

Go up to a cop and say F___k off pig!, get a billy across the jaw and we'll start fresh about your freedom of speech.




posted on Jun, 25 2014 @ 09:59 PM
link   
a reply to: FreedomEntered

What in particular are you talking about. Examples please?



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 04:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: FreedomEntered
I am starting to think that when celebrities sell sex, ie with porn films, or naked photos, or via the media they take profession in that its acceptable. . It is starting to get on my nerves I cannot switch on the TV without avoiding it and often times my whole family and I am appalled. Of course an additional worry is how to protect children from this. Its not that were old fashioned . Its just we wouldn't want to see our neighbours in such compromising positions... and if we did they may just be in trouble particulary if they did this kind of thing in a very public place, and yet celebrities are all about doing it publically!

So why is it legal to see celebrities in these such positions?

I think there is a double standard here .

Take for example Madonna and her sex book, posing in an erotic position with a dog. And yet... if an ordinary person did this on the street some where they would be locked up. And this such material can make its way into the unsuspecting persons life or view via media or people spreading this type of material about.

Are their fans blinded? Or maybe just brainwashed? I cant work out what's happening and why such double standards exist.

Or could this be a silent revolution against Christian old fashioned ideas on sexuality?


you know, celebrities use any means necessary to stay relevant in the news and these crazy stuff you mentioned are just tool to create public furor and thus everyone is reminded that she/he is still in the game



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: FreedomEntered




Its just we wouldn't want to see our neighbours in such compromising positions... and if we did they may just be in trouble particulary if they did this kind of thing in a very public place, and yet celebrities are all about doing it publically!


examples of celebrities "doing it" in public places?




Take for example Madonna and her sex book, posing in an erotic position with a dog. And yet... if an ordinary person did this on the street some where they would be locked up.


Great, an example to see what you are on about.

However, You are comparing a photo in a book with an actual act in a public street, how do you compare the two?




Are their fans blinded? Or maybe just brainwashed? I cant work out what's happening and why such double standards exist.


Are you blinded by something? Brainwashed by something?


What double standards?

The example you give compares a person performing sex acts on a dog in public (or so it seems thats what you were suggesting) to a erotic photo in a book.

Sorry but I dont see how you can compare the two as being the same.




Or could this be a silent revolution against Christian old fashioned ideas on sexuality?


It could be if it made any sense.

Maybe a better example that compares things that can be compared.




I am just asking that we wouldn't tolerate it if say a " teacher" or a " neighbour" exposed themselves as some celebrities do... so why do we tolerate it from celebrities?


Because a teacher or neighbor isnt out for fame like celebrities are so a celebrity will do things to cause controvery to gain more fame.

Still not sure what you mean by exposed, the first example given cant be compared in a rational sense.




Unless its something I want to seek out to see I do find it offensive if people are pushing an overtly sexual agenda into my face when I am simply a stranger to them .


Into your face?

You mention stuff in a book and I would assume MSM and what te TV supplies?

Were these types of media forced onto you or did you decide to buy a tv and other forms of media?



posted on Jun, 26 2014 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: FreedomEntered




I am saying go into the streets flashing your private parts and you will be behind bars before you know it. And yet if a celebrity does this its simply seen as acceptable/ground breaking even and really really cool dude!


What celebrity has gone out in the street to flash their privites and the medias reaction has been "groundbreaking and really really cool"?




A kim kardashian porn vid and an art museum are two different things. What I am saying is celebrities can sell off the cheap sex stunts they do by saying its art because everyone will buy into 90% of what they do.


Yes they are different.

The cheap se stunts are art, an art form to gain more fame in doing so gain more money.




However, I am saying for those who don't want to be exposed to it its near impossible not to be. Firstly there is the over zealous advertisement of these people, the marketing and then its packaged as " super cool" and fed out for major bucks.


Over zealous advertizmenst of celebrities flashing in public and performing sex acts on animals?

Its immpossible to not be exposed if you must use the forms of media given to entertain the masses.

Swith off your TV stop reading the gossip mags and filter your internet searches and you can lessen exposure that way.



posted on Jun, 27 2014 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fargoth
a reply to: opethPA

Go up to a cop and say F___k off pig!, get a billy across the jaw and we'll start fresh about your freedom of speech.


Go up to any person and say F__K off fool, get a punch across the jaw..

Yup, you are right..that proves you dont have freedom of speech.



posted on Jun, 27 2014 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: opethPA

Freedom of speech is selective. Just as immortal is corny



posted on Jun, 27 2014 @ 05:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fargoth
a reply to: opethPA

Freedom of speech is selective. Just as immortal is corny


Agreed, Immortal are corny and the various poses and faces that Abbath strikes always make me laugh which is why I used that pic.

I mean the dude Twerks at 2:26 of this video in full corpse paint , doesn't get much more tr00 kvlt than that. Hey you can watch this video and lol in the future in case you ever do lose your freedom of speech.




posted on Jun, 27 2014 @ 07:01 PM
link   
a reply to: opethPA

Abbath sure is a laugh riot. This reminds me of a conversation I'd have with friend who likes opeth and lives in PA. We used to laugh about abbath all the time.



posted on Jun, 30 2014 @ 05:38 PM
link   
When you have no talent you sell sex.




The non-talented have came into positions of power and put all of their non-talented friends on TV, in music and movies. That's why most things are so sucky. The talented are kept out of the fold intentionally.



new topics




 
7
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join