It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: supamang
I've done a take down scenario in a building with an active shooter where we all had a limited number of sim rounds and a choice between the m4 AR or M9 semi service pistol. I grabbed a pistol and has able to hit the active shooter, a GM1(USN) who had a pistol in each hand.
No one who grabbed the m4s were able to hit the active shooter. Over and over with ASF(auxiliary security force) classes the result is the same. The pistol was the better weapon for this kind of SWAT raid scenario, this building was the size of a large house. While having riflemen posted around the perimeter is a good tactic, those who are most likely going to be pulling the trigger at close quarters do not need a large AR with rounds that can do collateral damage one mile down the road.
originally posted by: Specimen
Its like Nukes really. You got A an B. A makes a small one, then make a bigger one. Then the B learns how to make one whether its simple physic or chemistry, or atomic science. And makes their own, which is bigger then the team A. Then A makes a bigger one. And B makes another bigger one.
Ever heard the saying it not the size, but how you use it?
originally posted by: Yurimaster
a reply to: Thecakeisalie
Help me understand why the sheeple like yourself buy in the the msm of the word assault weapons. Civilian ar15 are mordern sporting rifles for hunting, recreation and home defense. Assault weapons are15 (M4) with 14 inch barrel fully automatic full mill spec. At least law abiding citizens should have a rifle that can fire more than one shot. Why the police state can have all the firepower? Why the criminals can have a stolen fully auto assault rifle but you cant have one for protection? Dont let history repear it's self.
originally posted by: Vortiki
The majority of these people wouldn't know the difference between a belt-fed browning MG42 and a AA12 with an ammo drum.
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
Oh really? people go to funerals when the beer can assaulter uses another tool. An automobile. maybe we should start calling them assault vehicles to make it more scary.
originally posted by: Loveaduck
This is a joke right? Ha, ha! I get it. Very funny sense of humor. I know you actually do know why they call them assault weapons. No one goes to a funeral when you assault a beer.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: supamang
I've done a take down scenario in a building with an active shooter where we all had a limited number of sim rounds and a choice between the m4 AR or M9 semi service pistol. I grabbed a pistol and has able to hit the active shooter, a GM1(USN) who had a pistol in each hand.
No one who grabbed the m4s were able to hit the active shooter. Over and over with ASF(auxiliary security force) classes the result is the same. The pistol was the better weapon for this kind of SWAT raid scenario, this building was the size of a large house. While having riflemen posted around the perimeter is a good tactic, those who are most likely going to be pulling the trigger at close quarters do not need a large AR with rounds that can do collateral damage one mile down the road.
originally posted by: Yurimaster
a reply to: Thecakeisalie
Help me understand why the sheeple like yourself buy in the the msm of the word assault weapons. Civilian ar15 are mordern sporting rifles for hunting, recreation and home defense. Assault weapons are15 (M4) with 14 inch barrel fully automatic full mill spec. At least law abiding citizens should have a rifle that can fire more than one shot. Why the police state can have all the firepower? Why the criminals can have a stolen fully auto assault rifle but you cant have one for protection? Dont let history repear it's self.
originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
originally posted by: Yurimaster
a reply to: Thecakeisalie
Help me understand why the sheeple like yourself buy in the the msm of the word assault weapons. Civilian ar15 are mordern sporting rifles for hunting, recreation and home defense. Assault weapons are15 (M4) with 14 inch barrel fully automatic full mill spec. At least law abiding citizens should have a rifle that can fire more than one shot. Why the police state can have all the firepower? Why the criminals can have a stolen fully auto assault rifle but you cant have one for protection? Dont let history repear it's self.
I'm sorry but as a former U.S. Marine, I don't understand WTF YOU'RE TRYING TO SAY.
Explain to me why any modern sporting rifle would have semi-automatic capabilities....I think that really defeats the purpose of sport...
Semi-automatic, selective firing, and full auto are preferred by military and police forces all over the world...They allow one to acquire(and eliminate if need be) multiple targets quickly...
I've been in multiple combat zones and multiple firefights...some that lasted longer than I thought they ever would...but not once did I think that fully automatic would be the best choice...2 in the chest, 1 in the head...not, 30 around and none on target...(because that's generally what fully automatic shooters do...)So naturally semi-automatic was preferred....and it worked...well
So unless you're hunting a pack of rabid deer...(or are a really wretched shot) then you really don't need semi-automatic capabilities.......
Granted, I understand the debate. As you should expect, I am against any form of gun control...I am however convinced that both sides have bones to pick...which shouldn't be the case when it comes to circumstances such as these...
The people have rights...and they have them for a reason...
However, these rights should be logically applied...not abused "because I can"...
It's also important to note how very simple it is to convert an AR15 to full auto...There are even a few places that sell conversion kits LEGALLY...(they are uncompleted parts that you have to bend, and since they are not selling COMPLETED PARTS, it's considered legal)
Again, I am against gun control and don't really have a dog in this fight....but what you're spewing is utter nonsense.
If you're hunting for sport, there are significantly better choices than an AR15...
Think of the characteristics of the AR15 and then consider this...
Hunting rifles are generally intended for carrying a lot and shooting a little....
Tactical rifles are made for shooting a lot and carrying for only as far as necessary...
(Sure, they would work as hunting rifles with the right configuration, no problem...but they can just as easily be full auto as well)
A2D