It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
Anyone that has a video camera (or a camera that can take video) can go out and test this just fine. Take an object and move it at the same speed, have one very close to the camera, and the other quite far, and look at your results: the object close to the camera will seem to move with incredible speed as compared to the object further away.
originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: Uggielicious
So you didn't click the link I shared then?
Seems people here have been trying to help people's open their minds up to the possibility of it being birds for years, yet some remain ridiculously closed minded.
originally posted by: Uggielicious
The 2 objects are at a hell of a distance and like some others claim the objects did not emanate frofromtrees but at a distance behind them.
originally posted by: Uggielicious
I did visit the link and I was not impressed with the video clips because they all show what can be accepted as "bugs" flying close to the camera. The video under discussion here, in my opinion, are not bugs. The 2 objects are at a hell of a distance and like some others claim the objects did not emanate fromtrees but at a distance behind them.
originally posted by: Uggielicious
Again, the objects are not coming from nor are they in front of the trees. The GIFs start after the objects are visible because they are so fast that the rate of video frame doesn't show them before they are seen. IOW, if I could videotape the original footage and then play it back frame-by-frame there is a possibility that they could be seen not behind the trees but in the distance behind the trees. Because the video is 2D the depth is lost so the image is flat giving the wrong perspective.
you fail because I agree that rods may be insects but you cannot blow out of the water the super-long, high in the sky rods and I have a few examples of them on videotape.
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: Uggielicious
The 2 objects are at a hell of a distance and like some others claim the objects did not emanate frofromtrees but at a distance behind them.
You mean the in-focus trees are in front of the blurfos?
Please show your measurements and calculations.
F.Y.I. "Hell of a" is not a unit of measure.
originally posted by: Uggielicious
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: Uggielicious
The 2 objects are at a hell of a distance and like some others claim the objects did not emanate frofromtrees but at a distance behind them.
You mean the in-focus trees are in front of the blurfos?
Please show your measurements and calculations.
F.Y.I. "Hell of a" is not a unit of measure.
If the trees were in focus as you claim then it would simpler to see the objects. The trees are not in a clear and sharp focus, and the objects are not since they are hauling. I don't know about the camera used but I doubt that it was set for high-speed photography as the scene being filmed was static and the interest could have been the approaching motorcyclist necessitating a middle of the road focus.
And while "Hell" is not a measure of speed it indicates that whatever is being discussed it is hauling faster than normal. "Hell" can be applied to anything at high speed when the actual speed is not known.
What could help solve the distance versus trees problem would be to have a dub of the original footage which could stand magnification of the trees area. Nothing that has been shown so far by ATS members is solid that the objects are emanating from or in front of the trees, far from it.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
Use the link to actually go to YouTube, and since I made the video 1080, you can watch it full screen if you desire:
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: AlphaHawk
Looks exactly like birds would.
My thought was hummingbirds. On some of the still frames you can even see the reflections of the shiny wings.
They only seem to come from beyond the trees because they are lost in the contrast.