It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Who exactly are you referencing here? All I see are people discussing the article.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
The formation of chemicals is based on two factors: The juice used and the temp at which it is burned.
Unless you go out of your way to buy some cheap, nasty juice and burn it at a high temp, Im guessing youll be fine.
Anything, when burned at a high enough temp, will cause chemical reactions.
Yeah sure maybe, I think we need a study on that too, it is great info for us to have... I'll enjoy my ecig even more knowing that I've cut down from dozens of carcinogens to just one! And if I vape as I do it will be at very low levels if at all. Happy days.
No worries I was just a little confused. its of no consequence, so it really doesnt matter
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Who exactly are you referencing here? All I see are people discussing the article.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
The formation of chemicals is based on two factors: The juice used and the temp at which it is burned.
Unless you go out of your way to buy some cheap, nasty juice and burn it at a high temp, Im guessing youll be fine.
Anything, when burned at a high enough temp, will cause chemical reactions.
Yeah sure maybe, I think we need a study on that too, it is great info for us to have... I'll enjoy my ecig even more knowing that I've cut down from dozens of carcinogens to just one! And if I vape as I do it will be at very low levels if at all. Happy days.
Have you quoted the wrong quote there? Did you mean to quote another? I'm a bit lost... But man serious I'm tired and drained. Barely slept for 2 days lol...
They wont ban vapes, what they will do is tax the crap out of it, making it so that only bigger companies can afford to produce the juice.
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: captaintyinknots
I hear you, no worries
I'm just saying that the studies should be performed and we will just have to wait and see what they come up with, even if it should be bad news.
If they in any way ban vapors they should also ban tobaco, if not there is clearly foul play from the tobaco companies.
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
No worries I was just a little confused. its of no consequence, so it really doesnt matter
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Who exactly are you referencing here? All I see are people discussing the article.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
The formation of chemicals is based on two factors: The juice used and the temp at which it is burned.
Unless you go out of your way to buy some cheap, nasty juice and burn it at a high temp, Im guessing youll be fine.
Anything, when burned at a high enough temp, will cause chemical reactions.
Yeah sure maybe, I think we need a study on that too, it is great info for us to have... I'll enjoy my ecig even more knowing that I've cut down from dozens of carcinogens to just one! And if I vape as I do it will be at very low levels if at all. Happy days.
Have you quoted the wrong quote there? Did you mean to quote another? I'm a bit lost... But man serious I'm tired and drained. Barely slept for 2 days lol...
Thats the point though. Once a tax is applied, the 'do it yourself' person will be out of luck, as well as most of the boutique juice makers. It will simply make it too expensive.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
No worries I was just a little confused. its of no consequence, so it really doesnt matter
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Who exactly are you referencing here? All I see are people discussing the article.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
The formation of chemicals is based on two factors: The juice used and the temp at which it is burned.
Unless you go out of your way to buy some cheap, nasty juice and burn it at a high temp, Im guessing youll be fine.
Anything, when burned at a high enough temp, will cause chemical reactions.
Yeah sure maybe, I think we need a study on that too, it is great info for us to have... I'll enjoy my ecig even more knowing that I've cut down from dozens of carcinogens to just one! And if I vape as I do it will be at very low levels if at all. Happy days.
Have you quoted the wrong quote there? Did you mean to quote another? I'm a bit lost... But man serious I'm tired and drained. Barely slept for 2 days lol...
Okay cool cool, all is well
And on another point about taxing vaporisers... Again possible, only you can make your own if you like, I have all the kit to do just that. Really easy to do and fun too. Maybe stock up on that incase they ban it lol... I do get you and most studies/articles I would agree with you. But I just found this to be positive and fairy unbiased, baring the use of the plural in the headline. But hey it is a new agency I wouldn't expect anything less from them.
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Thats the point though. Once a tax is applied, the 'do it yourself' person will be out of luck, as well as most of the boutique juice makers. It will simply make it too expensive.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
No worries I was just a little confused. its of no consequence, so it really doesnt matter
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Who exactly are you referencing here? All I see are people discussing the article.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
The formation of chemicals is based on two factors: The juice used and the temp at which it is burned.
Unless you go out of your way to buy some cheap, nasty juice and burn it at a high temp, Im guessing youll be fine.
Anything, when burned at a high enough temp, will cause chemical reactions.
Yeah sure maybe, I think we need a study on that too, it is great info for us to have... I'll enjoy my ecig even more knowing that I've cut down from dozens of carcinogens to just one! And if I vape as I do it will be at very low levels if at all. Happy days.
Have you quoted the wrong quote there? Did you mean to quote another? I'm a bit lost... But man serious I'm tired and drained. Barely slept for 2 days lol...
Okay cool cool, all is well
And on another point about taxing vaporisers... Again possible, only you can make your own if you like, I have all the kit to do just that. Really easy to do and fun too. Maybe stock up on that incase they ban it lol... I do get you and most studies/articles I would agree with you. But I just found this to be positive and fairy unbiased, baring the use of the plural in the headline. But hey it is a new agency I wouldn't expect anything less from them.
Take a look at what has happened to the price of rolling tobacco since it began to be taxed.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Thats the point though. Once a tax is applied, the 'do it yourself' person will be out of luck, as well as most of the boutique juice makers. It will simply make it too expensive.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
No worries I was just a little confused. its of no consequence, so it really doesnt matter
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Who exactly are you referencing here? All I see are people discussing the article.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
The formation of chemicals is based on two factors: The juice used and the temp at which it is burned.
Unless you go out of your way to buy some cheap, nasty juice and burn it at a high temp, Im guessing youll be fine.
Anything, when burned at a high enough temp, will cause chemical reactions.
Yeah sure maybe, I think we need a study on that too, it is great info for us to have... I'll enjoy my ecig even more knowing that I've cut down from dozens of carcinogens to just one! And if I vape as I do it will be at very low levels if at all. Happy days.
Have you quoted the wrong quote there? Did you mean to quote another? I'm a bit lost... But man serious I'm tired and drained. Barely slept for 2 days lol...
Okay cool cool, all is well
And on another point about taxing vaporisers... Again possible, only you can make your own if you like, I have all the kit to do just that. Really easy to do and fun too. Maybe stock up on that incase they ban it lol... I do get you and most studies/articles I would agree with you. But I just found this to be positive and fairy unbiased, baring the use of the plural in the headline. But hey it is a new agency I wouldn't expect anything less from them.
Hmmm but aren't the ingredients used for other purposes? I'm not so sure they can tax the individual ingredients but I can defo see them taxing the crap out of the completed ejuice.
originally posted by: nrd101
Take this to heart: Its 1 ONE study. without separate scientists backing what they say, I am going to go out on a limb and call hogwash. Formaldehyde in formaldehyde out - in other words I don't think there is any unknown chemical reactions occurring that we didn't already know about. "oh yea its got formaldehyde" chya don't you think we would've discovered this in another study by NOW? be critical and deny ignorance and big tobacco. I vape, and I don't believe this for ONE second.
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Take a look at what has happened to the price of rolling tobacco since it began to be taxed.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Thats the point though. Once a tax is applied, the 'do it yourself' person will be out of luck, as well as most of the boutique juice makers. It will simply make it too expensive.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
No worries I was just a little confused. its of no consequence, so it really doesnt matter
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Who exactly are you referencing here? All I see are people discussing the article.
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
The formation of chemicals is based on two factors: The juice used and the temp at which it is burned.
Unless you go out of your way to buy some cheap, nasty juice and burn it at a high temp, Im guessing youll be fine.
Anything, when burned at a high enough temp, will cause chemical reactions.
Yeah sure maybe, I think we need a study on that too, it is great info for us to have... I'll enjoy my ecig even more knowing that I've cut down from dozens of carcinogens to just one! And if I vape as I do it will be at very low levels if at all. Happy days.
Have you quoted the wrong quote there? Did you mean to quote another? I'm a bit lost... But man serious I'm tired and drained. Barely slept for 2 days lol...
Okay cool cool, all is well
And on another point about taxing vaporisers... Again possible, only you can make your own if you like, I have all the kit to do just that. Really easy to do and fun too. Maybe stock up on that incase they ban it lol... I do get you and most studies/articles I would agree with you. But I just found this to be positive and fairy unbiased, baring the use of the plural in the headline. But hey it is a new agency I wouldn't expect anything less from them.
Hmmm but aren't the ingredients used for other purposes? I'm not so sure they can tax the individual ingredients but I can defo see them taxing the crap out of the completed ejuice.
The individual ingredients would get a little tricky to tax, but the nicotine certainly could be, and, if my suspicion is correct, you will see the glycol and the such become very tough to find in anything but industrial size containers.
originally posted by: rickymouse
The Formaldehyde probably comes from the carrier, propylene glycol. I doubt if it actually comes from the nicotine. There are a couple of carriers that they use. So this Formaldehyde issue may not be with all the different mixes. Propylene glycol is sometimes put in regular cigs. too
An E-cig is much more potent than a cigarette I have heard, but you only only take a few tokes at a time to get the nootropic effect.
If you want to know what B-carbolines are, just google it. They are in many things in varied amounts. High concentrations are in some mushrooms. Tobacco has a moderate dose, nothing that is going to get you high, but it does add to the dependency issue.
originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: Mianeye
And those supposed carcinogens, are in what ratio compaired to analog cigarettes?
Totally out of conrol Nazism.
I quit smoking 2 to 3 packs, per day, thanks to e-cig. That is the real reason there is now a push to ban them. That is a lot of tax dollars not being "collected", which impacts state "revenue". I am sure Phillip Morris is not spending gobs of money to ban them too, as ecigs compete directly with the bottom line as well.
Nope, the only reason of course, is for the children.