It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sdcigarpig
a reply to: Bedlam
You are not reading the full posting, only want you want to. As I have stated before, if the animal is under the control of the owner, properly restrained in say a fenced in yard, or on a leash, where the owner has full control over the animal, if the police shoots it, then the police is in the wrong. If the animal is running loose on the street or where it is not under control of the owner, then the police are in the right.
You can not have it both ways, cause eventually, if animals are allowed to run free, there will be problems. I guess that all of the kind hearted people would prefer to have a pack of dogs running rampant in the streets, then the cry will be why don't the authorities do something? Or would you prefer a more legal aspect, like say San Francisco that makes laws that restricts a persons right to get a dog as a pet?
originally posted by: schuyler
You worry about a couple of dogs shot in the USA? How about worrying about dogs being eaten in the Far East? It's more than a few.
originally posted by: sdcigarpig
a reply to: peter vlar
I would agree, however statistic don't lie. Only 30% of the dogs that are picked up by animal control are reclaimed by the owner, care to guess what happens to a dog that is not adopted out? It is put down.