It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: liveandlearn
Regardless of how one believes about the Bundy affair, this will and has become a tipping point between the feds and state rights. And thank the people for that. The more people who stand for Bundy and the more media coverage, the better for 'we the people', men and women against an unjust law. Hopefully with revelations about Reid, more of our corrupt government will be exposed. Although I have not seen much MSM coverage I believe it will reach a point that they have no choice. Or more accurate, I hope they have no choice.I fully believe that it i sites like ATS that keep the story alive.
originally posted by: Zaanny
I am thankful that people are finally waking up to the fact that the States hold all of the power.
Mr Bundy stated he would have no problem paying the true landlords grazing fees... the people of clark county.
So if little Mr Reid wants to put on his big boy pants and start a civil war in the south have at it.
He will loose
originally posted by: Happy1
a reply to: vethumanbeing
Since the BLM has soooo many armed thugs just waiting to shoot humans - why don't they go "patrol" the AZ/Mexican border and shoot a lot of people with guns - and illegal drugs - and polluters of the environment?
Guess that would interfere with their "north american union" plans under the NWO.
originally posted by: Happy1
a reply to: vethumanbeing
AZ has it's own replication of dingey harry ried - that's the war-mongering john mccain.
And I personally hate the democratic party of thieves -
We, Americans, really need to look at the life-long "representatives" in d.c. and see what exactly ALL of those thieves are doing to our country.
We really need to become the united STATES of America again - and make ALL politics local - and disband all of these created federal bureaucracies (spelling?) and "departments" headed by "czars".
Dirty Harry would have served himself better to use the quote rather than paraphrase it, as you suggest he may have done. I think it's a pretty good bet he meant it as he said it. He's nowhere near as smart as John Adams was and the two do not mean the same.
originally posted by: khimbar
To all those questioning the quote, do you not recognise he is paraphrasing this?
“A government of laws, and not of men.”
John Adams
"John Adams defined a constitutional republic as "a government of laws, and not of men."
"Constitutional republics are a deliberate attempt to diminish the perceived threat of majoritarianism, thereby protecting dissenting individuals and minority groups from the "tyranny of the majority" by placing checks on the power of the majority of the population.[2] The power of the majority of the people is checked by limiting that power to electing representatives who are required to legislate with limits of overarching constitutional law which a simple majority cannot modify."
originally posted by: buster2010
Reid is right America is a nation of laws many politicians has said this over and over again all the way back to John Adams.
Well that may be so, but Greta Van Susteren is using my Dirty Harry reference right now on her show LOL
originally posted by: daveinats
'Dingy Harry" not Dirty Harry. Dirty Harry was a patriot cleaning the streets of trash. Dingy Harry on the other hand, has his hands in the trash
Published on Apr 23, 2014
Senator Harry Reid calls Bundy protestors domestic terrorists. But what act of terrorism did they commit? Meanwhile, the President's adviser on Homeland Security says that families and communities can recognize homegrown terrorism by looking out for a "confrontational child". Is that the definition of domestic terrorism, confrontation? Turns out, if you look at what happened in Nevada, the answer may be, yes.