The Sun is Invisible in space!!

page: 10
12
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 20 2014 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: tsingtao

well, from what i've read about nutrinos, they take a very long time to get to the surface of the sun.
I think you're referring to light. Neutrinos take the direct route but you can sort of think of light (some of it) taking the long way, lots of detours from atom to atom.




ok, but wasn't it nutrino's that brought keanu reeves to earth when it stood still?





posted on Apr, 20 2014 @ 07:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Rob48

I hear ya. It sounded like "we're just immune" to me. As in his followers have heard the crackpot claim about him many times before. The thing is, this is Lindemann and that "shoe" seems to fit him.



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 03:27 AM
link   
NO and NO again...

While correct that you do not perceive light as it travels directly in a medium, you DO and CAN see the sun in visible light while in space.

Need proof?

farm3.static.flickr.com...

Also please dont go out and look at the sun. It will blind you regardless of what some manic fellow is saying during a conference.



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 03:42 AM
link   
a reply to: jollyjollyjolly

The Camera lense has defraction gradings in it.

Also the sunlight is not in free space it is passing through the atmosphere in the picture provided.

Good luck finding a photo thats not touched up and nasa doesnt own. because its not gonna be on the net.

You can't see light in free space. Period.








posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 03:48 AM
link   
a reply to: GallopingFish




You can't see light in free space. Period.

Clearly the voice of experience.
Can't argue with a statement seething with such authority.



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 03:50 AM
link   
Diffraction gratings? You sure about that? Even if it did, diffraction gratings don't alter the wavelength of light. They just separate light into its constituent wavelengths. Were you asleep in science class?



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 04:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Rob48

If i had a pinhole camera in free space, pointed it at the sun and took a picture. It would be a picture of nothing, black.

Same with the stars.

If one person reads this and goes and spends time researching, and finds the truth, i feel its worth mentioning it over and over.



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 04:09 AM
link   
a reply to: GallopingFish

If i had a pinhole camera in free space, pointed it at the sun and took a picture. It would be a picture of nothing, black.
No, It would be a picture of a very white spot.


Same with the stars.
That would depend on how long you left the pinhole open. Stars are a lot dimmer than the Sun because they are very much farther away.



i feel its worth mentioning it over and over.
Doesn't matter how many times you say it, it's nonsense.
edit on 4/22/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 04:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

This energy we call "light" is transmitted through space (vacuum) & does not atrophy at all until it strikes an object, an asteroid, or planet for example. It needs "matter" to interact with it.

This best describes light, the light we are arguing over is visible light. Light in free space is yet to strike matter.




posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 04:24 AM
link   
a reply to: GallopingFish
So light does not spread? It is not subject to the inverse square law? Visible light is somehow different (other than wavelength) from all other forms of electromagnetic radiation?


Oh...and where did you say the neutrinos come from?



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 11:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: GallopingFish
a reply to: jollyjollyjolly


Also the sunlight is not in free space it is passing through the atmosphere in the picture provided.


No it isn't. The atmosphere is much thinner than you think it is.



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 07:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: GallopingFish
a reply to: jollyjollyjolly

The Camera lense has defraction gradings in it.

Also the sunlight is not in free space it is passing through the atmosphere in the picture provided.

Good luck finding a photo thats not touched up and nasa doesnt own. because its not gonna be on the net.

You can't see light in free space. Period.







Heres one and it isnt NASA and its in free space www.isas.jaxa.jp... the big thing in the picture behind venus its called the sun.



posted on Apr, 22 2014 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: GallopingFish
a reply to: Phage

This energy we call "light" is transmitted through space (vacuum) & does not atrophy at all until it strikes an object, an asteroid, or planet for example. It needs "matter" to interact with it.

This best describes light, the light we are arguing over is visible light. Light in free space is yet to strike matter.



If you are not looking directly at the light source than you need matter for light to reflect off of. But if you look directly at the light source like a distant star nothing is needed. Look even by this screwy theory light has to travel through fluid in your eye so even that would still make it visible. Now mind you this has nothing to do with it but it will still be the same as passing though at atmosphere or water. I really cant believe people actually by this how do you think we take pictures of stars using hubble its nothing more than mirrors.



posted on Apr, 23 2014 @ 03:53 PM
link   
Stars in zodiacal light and the lunar sunrise captured by LADEE, a camera in space.

www.planetary.org...

Apollo already did this obviously



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 05:26 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

That pic you sent is from Japan aerospace exploration agency... There logo has a Vector symbol in it just as Nasa has a Vector symbol. Russia has a Vector symbol too... Here is some others... watch it all

www.youtube.com...

Do the research...

Huge Lies



posted on Apr, 29 2014 @ 05:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: GallopingFish
a reply to: dragonridr

That pic you sent is from Japan aerospace exploration agency... There logo has a Vector symbol in it just as Nasa has a Vector symbol. Russia has a Vector symbol too... Here is some others... watch it all

www.youtube.com...

Do the research...

Huge Lies


Spooky music - check
Tenuous conclusions drawn from thin air - check
Total lack of relevance - check

Yep, it's a conspiracy alright.

That's right sheeple, wake up - using a red V in your logo will make your science work.





top topics
 
12
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join