It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Light cannot be seen unless it's bouncing off objects or particles.
This is cool because you could technically look through the sun!!!! I wouldn't though because this guy says you still go blind ;-)
originally posted by: GallopingFish
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
The Sun is a ball of (mostly) hydrogen gas. The fusion of hydrogen into helium deep inside the center of the sun creates photons. Those photons are eventually emitted from the sun (after being absorbed and re-emitted by the stuff in the layers above the center). Those emitted photons that were originally caused by the fusion then strikes our eyes, and we see that as sunlight.
Therefore, what we see when we see sunlight is the fusion reactions of the Sun...i.e., when we see sunlight, we see the Sun.
What you seem to be saying is "we can't see the sun because the bright light coming from it obscures it". However, that bright light IS the Sun.
Now there is no way to prove what is happening underneath the photosphere. This is speculation and theory, on all counts.
People should stop dogmatically following inside the sun information as a fact and regurgitating it as gospel. Its a theory.
IThe scientific method has four steps:
1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.
2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation.
3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.
4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.
originally posted by: Op3nM1nd3d
a reply to: GallopingFish
Hmm, I think I get what you are saying. It`s true that we actually see the light not the sun but because it`s concentrated around a point that is emitting light, we call it the sunlight or simply sun because that point is the star that we call sun...
originally posted by: GallopingFish
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
The Sun is a ball of (mostly) hydrogen gas. The fusion of hydrogen into helium deep inside the center of the sun creates photons. Those photons are eventually emitted from the sun (after being absorbed and re-emitted by the stuff in the layers above the center). Those emitted photons that were originally caused by the fusion then strikes our eyes, and we see that as sunlight.
Therefore, what we see when we see sunlight is the fusion reactions of the Sun...i.e., when we see sunlight, we see the Sun.
What you seem to be saying is "we can't see the sun because the bright light coming from it obscures it". However, that bright light IS the Sun.
Now there is no way to prove what is happening underneath the photosphere. This is speculation and theory, on all counts.
People should stop dogmatically following inside the sun information as a fact and regurgitating it as gospel. Its a theory.
originally posted by: buddha
if that was true, you could not see stars in space to!
oh! wait.
you Never see stars in photos from space.
the telescopes in space use
infared, gamma and other dadiation.
but not light?
originally posted by: AgentSmith
Obviously the motivation of the promoters is money and a cult following
originally posted by: BridgebyaFountain
originally posted by: AgentSmith
Obviously the motivation of the promoters is money and a cult following
I think whoever came up with this one-size-fits-all excuse was probably after money and a cult following. Probably the pedophile James Randi who came up with it.
The light we see is from reactions associated with the workings of the sun....i.e., we see sunlight from the sun, light that is the photons produced by the sun, photons produced as the sun does the things the sun does (the sun's reactions). Therefore, I'd call seeing those photons "seeing the sun".
An analogy to what 'galloping fish' said would be sort of like saying we can't really see a fire because the light from the flame is in the way.
originally posted by: buddha
if that was true, you could not see stars in space to!
oh! wait.
you Never see stars in photos from space.
the telescopes in space use
infared, gamma and other dadiation.
but not light?
originally posted by: Op3nM1nd3d
a reply to: Soylent Green Is People
The light we see is from reactions associated with the workings of the sun....i.e., we see sunlight from the sun, light that is the photons produced by the sun, photons produced as the sun does the things the sun does (the sun's reactions). Therefore, I'd call seeing those photons "seeing the sun".
An analogy to what 'galloping fish' said would be sort of like saying we can't really see a fire because the light from the flame is in the way.
I agree. But what do you actually see? the light or the fire?...
So again, you see the actual light or photons or whatever you want to call it. It`s not like it`s blocking its way, but light is the only thing you would ever see from a source of light and not the word behind it or the chemical reaction which produces it...
The sunlight isn't getting in the way of seeing the Sun because the sunlight IS the Sun (at least in part). The photon of light we see was caused by the fusion reaction; we are seeing that reaction.