It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Scientists Find Treatment to Kill Every Kind of Cancer Tumor

page: 2
115
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:47 PM
link   

OpinionatedB
reply to post by iamhobo
 


Too late for my daughter, but I am in tears of joy for the next woman who wont have to watch her baby suffer like that - and the next young adult who will be raising their children instead of others.


edit on 27-3-2014 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)


I'm so sorry for your loss. I lost both my grandfathers to cancer (lung and prostate).

Big internet hug for you.




posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:47 PM
link   
Amazing, I hope they release it properly and don't keep a cure like this hidden as some people claim they do. Cancer sucks and I really hope this cure will continue to work correctly against every kind of cancerous tumor it battles.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Oaktree
 


Tons of money in a cure.

Find the cute to cancer, patent it, and let me know how much money you make.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:47 PM
link   
This came just a little too late for my friend who recently lost her battle with aggressive breast cancer
Hopefully this pans out to be a very effective treatment and families don't have to watch their loved ones waste away from the cancer beast anymore.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:48 PM
link   
Combine this with Mark Davis' delivery drug.
Which sadly is still in phase 1 testing after 15 years, while viagra went from application to pharmacies in a year and a half because the FDA "fast tracked" it because it was so promising.
It really doesn't seem like they are in a rush to cure cancer for some reason.
And let's not even get into Royal Rife.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:53 PM
link   
Might want to by some stock in this company.



~Morpheus



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:54 PM
link   
reply to post by iamhobo
 


I'll keep my fingers crossed. Maybe there's finally hope there's a cure for cancer on the horizon. Considering the pace of new technology flooding the market, medical breakthroughs are at a snails pace in comparison.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:55 PM
link   
reply to post by MorpheusUSA
 

The Stanford School of Medicine?



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 08:56 PM
link   
reply to post by iamhobo
 


I find this to be good news. However, we are still not attacking the root of the problem.

We need answers on the origins of where cancer comes from in the first place.

The problem with this is that there is no money in prevention.
edit on 27-3-2014 by bitsforbytes because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 09:15 PM
link   

Phage
reply to post by MorpheusUSA
 

The Stanford School of Medicine?


I just picked up 2000 share...



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 09:30 PM
link   


The hell there isn't.
reply to post by Phage
 


I totally agree....anyone suffering from cancer would probably pay any price if this drug works.

I'll be watching this story closely. It certainly looks promising. My fingers are crossed.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 09:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


What I (and you?) consider money, pharmaceuticals giggle about, and while a cure would be a profit godsend to a company, that patent will end in +/-20yrs.

After that, the cure for cancer is stocked on a shelf next to the common allergy pill.

Also, it would stand to reason that a cure would eventually lead to preventative medication, possibly making the cash cow that cancer is, a thing of the past.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 09:42 PM
link   
reply to post by deadcalm
 




....anyone suffering from cancer would probably pay any price if this drug works.


And how would they pay "any price"?
Credit card?



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 09:43 PM
link   

kathat
Ok so they can cure it, what it cancer being replaced with to keep us perpeptually ill?



It wont necessarily be something new, more likely it will be the absence of something old, antibiotics.

Kind Regards
Myselfaswell



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 09:46 PM
link   
I'm sure they found out about this from a study on the coincidence that people with Asthma and some autoimmune diseases usually don't get cancer nearly as often. In people with asthma and autoimmune problems, they block the immune system so now they can get cancer. Also consumption of Carrageenan kills a lot of immune system macrophages and certain T cells. It is put in foods to keep us from negatively reacting to the food. The same goes for some forms of the free glutamates that they put in food to attract us.

Guess what, instead of addressing the problem and healing us, they treat the symptoms. Much of this is done by chemical companies selling to the food industry. This is not caused by the doctors, although some know of the negative effects of dampening the immune system but do not tell the patients, believing there has to be definite proof to stop prescribing drugs. I suppose we need to watch how foods effect us more before rushing to the doctor right away. This information about metabolic intolerances can help the doctor help you....that is if the doctor listens to you, some do not.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 09:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Oaktree
 


After that, the cure for cancer is stocked on a shelf next to the common allergy pill.
Maybe, if it's that safe. But that applies to everything, doesn't it? Why produce any new drugs at all?


Also, it would stand to reason that a cure would eventually lead to preventative medication, possibly making the cash cow that cancer is, a thing of the past.
Non-sequitor. Learning new ways to kill cancer does not imply learning its cause(s). But why would preventative medication (assuming there may be such a thing) be less profitable?

I'm not sure you can consider cancer to be a cash cow though. While treatment can be very costly, the technology, doctors, drugs and technicians involved in it spread that cost around.
edit on 3/27/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 09:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Thank you for providing the link to Stanford Medical. I had no idea they were planning human trials by mid-2014.

Great news, truly hope it goes well.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 10:03 PM
link   
reply to post by rickymouse
 


I'm sure they found out about this from a study on the coincidence that people with Asthma and some autoimmune diseases usually don't get cancer nearly as often.
No. They found out about it ten years ago when it was discovered that leukemia cells produce more CD47 than healthy cells do.


In people with asthma and autoimmune problems, they block the immune system so now they can get cancer.
What is "blocking" the immune system is the CD47 which is in the cancer cells.

Oh, BTW:

The increased risk of lung cancer among never smoking individuals with asthma supports a direct relation between asthma and lung cancer. There is biological evidence to support this association.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...




edit on 3/27/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 10:03 PM
link   


And how would they pay "any price"?
Credit card?
reply to post by Oaktree
 


Ahhh...the semantics police. What I should have said is that they would pay any price IF they could afford it. But whether they can or not, will not stop the drug companies for charging through the roof for this. I have no doubt that a family would take out a second mortgage or even sell their home if it meant that they could save a loved one's life.

You must excuse me....I got excited at the prospect of this. I watched my Father go from a man of 235 lbs...a big strong man....to 97 lbs the day he passed away from a very agressive form of lukemia. I watched the chemotherapy and cancer ravage him in less than a year from the day he was diagnosed....I wouldn't wish that on anyone.



posted on Mar, 27 2014 @ 10:05 PM
link   
reply to post by deadcalm
 




I have no doubt that a family would take out a second mortgage or even sell their home if it meant that they could save a loved one's life.

Or start cooking meth. (In case anyone missed it, that's a reference to Breaking Bad)



new topics

top topics



 
115
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join