It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
thedeadtruth
The public opinion about SIDs is also heavily tainted by political correctness ( not wanting to openly blame parents ).
The media hardly give any attention to coroners reports.
Classic Eg..... The amount of babies dying of suffocation ( due to obese parents sleeping with children ) is only starting to be addressed in my country. Even though it has been a known FACT for as long as I have been in the industry. ( over 30 years )
Academics have danced around the issue the whole time.
So even if they knew the answer. Do not automatically assume it would be shared openly.
nitetrain
reply to post by nugget1
Spasm is involuntary loss of muscle control which causes the epiglottis to fail and block the passage...you just added the term of the area of the trachea laryngomalacia..which is the area I was discussing..
I guess you changed tune with my exposure to the subject, which you know nothing of....just because you say someone knows nothing of a subject, does not make it true....check yourself next time, or read more carefully..edit on 25-1-2014 by nitetrain because: (no reason given)
thedeadtruth
reply to post by nugget1
This is a fact great "educated" one.
The media have published the term SIDS linked to dozens of cases I have personally been involved with. When the coroners reports have later indicated direct responsibility to its induced environment or the parents behavior.
But the press NEVER retract.
I stand by my comments.
Advantage
You know, I was thinking... if we could tell what kids have this issue, a sleep apnea monitor.. or something like it.. would alert when the breathing stopped. That would greatly up chances of the baby surviving.
thedeadtruth
So again we have people looking for a rare hidden factor to SIDS. The 1% .
Preferably the one factor no-one can be blamed for.
Why do we do this..... not for the children. Because if was for the children's safety we would be concentrating on the 99% where the parents are known to be the biggest risk to the infants life.
We know certain factors , smoke , drinking alcohol during pregnancy , being an obese mother etc... can directly cause an infant harm.
But no-one ever gets charged.