It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
butcherguy
From your link:
Edwards says she chose to illustrate this time in history by using race reversal, in an effort to shine new light on an old but standing matter.
"standing matter"? Is there a lot of lynching going on today?
I am not sure of her age, but I think she didn't live through a period of American history where lynchings of people did occur.
Her work is meant to be incendiary, she shouldn't have done it.
Auricom
reply to post by pstrron
Very typical of our "modern" society to accept things like this. It wasn't OK when whites did it, why should it be OK when blacks do it? (I do realize this wasn't an actual lynching, but think for a minute: What in the hell would happen if whites were behind this "art" lynching two blacks?)
It's people like this "artist" that helps to continue to tensions between races. Al and Jesse too.
redhorse
reply to post by pstrron
Honestly on this one... Performance art is performance art. While the social commentary with this particular "art" seems tired, she can say what she wants as long as no one got hurt. I'm not going to get my panties in a twist over it.
jimmyx
Auricom
reply to post by pstrron
Very typical of our "modern" society to accept things like this. It wasn't OK when whites did it, why should it be OK when blacks do it? (I do realize this wasn't an actual lynching, but think for a minute: What in the hell would happen if whites were behind this "art" lynching two blacks?)
It's people like this "artist" that helps to continue to tensions between races. Al and Jesse too.
I'm a 61 year old white man.....have you been to the south lately? let's just say the N word is used openly and freely, maybe not in certain modern city enclaves, but it would be hard to go a whole day, without hearing it anywhere else.
“There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.”
― Booker T. Washington
jimmyx
butcherguy
From your link:
Edwards says she chose to illustrate this time in history by using race reversal, in an effort to shine new light on an old but standing matter.
"standing matter"? Is there a lot of lynching going on today?
I am not sure of her age, but I think she didn't live through a period of American history where lynchings of people did occur.
Her work is meant to be incendiary, she shouldn't have done it.
luuucy..you got sum splainin' to do...
www.lawschooldiscussion.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
it took me five minutes to find these...just think if I took my time, how many more I would find.
“The purpose of this performance was to bring to light social injustices and the issue of inequality that impacts me and my community as a whole,” Edwards said.
opal13
Well, if it had been a white student that used black men as a "prop" no one would hear the end of it and Sharpton and Jackson would be all over the media hopping mad and telling everyone it is NOT art, but racism.
Maybe art, but racist, plain and simple. Racism is a two way street.
opal13
Well, if it had been a white student that used black men as a "prop" no one would hear the end of it and Sharpton and Jackson would be all over the media hopping mad and telling everyone it is NOT art, but racism.
Maybe art, but racist, plain and simple. Racism is a two way street.
TheWrightWing
redhorse
reply to post by pstrron
Honestly on this one... Performance art is performance art. While the social commentary with this particular "art" seems tired, she can say what she wants as long as no one got hurt. I'm not going to get my panties in a twist over it.
If the races were reversed, I wonder what the panty-twist result would be?
If it were a white student "lynching" blacks, would it be received with a calm "Performance art is performance art" attitude?
Place your bets here.
jimmyx
butcherguy
From your link:
Edwards says she chose to illustrate this time in history by using race reversal, in an effort to shine new light on an old but standing matter.
"standing matter"? Is there a lot of lynching going on today?
I am not sure of her age, but I think she didn't live through a period of American history where lynchings of people did occur.
Her work is meant to be incendiary, she shouldn't have done it.
luuucy..you got sum splainin' to do...
www.lawschooldiscussion.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
it took me five minutes to find these...just think if I took my time, how many more I would find.
In 1981, a trial of Josephus Anderson, an African American charged with the murder of a white policeman, took place in Mobile. While Anderson was convicted at a subsequent trial, this one ended without the jury reaching a verdict. The mistrial upset members of the United Klans of America who believed that the reason for the lack of decision was that some members of the jury were African Americans. At a meeting held after the mistrial, Bennie Hays, the second-highest-ranking official in the United Klans in Alabama, said: "If a black man can get away with killing a white man, we ought to be able to get away with killing a black man."[3]
An inflammatory cartoon from the UKA's The Fiery Cross that was used as evidence in the civil trial resulting from Michael Donald's murder.
The same night other Klan members burnt a three-foot cross on the Mobile County courthouse lawn. Bennie Hays' son, Henry Hays (age 26), and James Llewellyn "Tiger" Knowles (age 17) drove around Mobile looking for a victim.[4][5] Picked at random, they spotted Michael Donald walking home from getting his sister a pack of cigarettes. They kidnapped him, drove out to a secluded area in the woods, attacked him and beat him with a tree limb. They wrapped a rope around his neck, and pulled on it to strangle him, before slitting his throat and hanging him from a tree across the street from Hays' house.[4]
theantediluvian
QUANTUMGR4V17Y
The only question that needs to be asked, which is rhetorical, is; If the student had been white and the actors black, would it still be considered Art?
My bet is Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson would be calling for race riots and that this student be expelled and not allowed into another higher learning institution. The student would be berated 24/7 on TV as being the resurrection of civil war racism.
This is a standing issue? A BLACK MAN HOLDS THE HIGHEST OFFICE IN THE WORLD, BY POPULAR VOTE, IN A PRIMARILY WHITE COUNTRY. (The President of the United States.)
Peace.edit on 18-12-2013 by QUANTUMGR4V17Y because: (no reason given)
The more comments like this I read, the more I think of this staged lynching, though admittedly sophomoric, as a work of art. The intended audience was obviously white America. The real question is why are you so upset? A perceived double-standard? Do you believe there exists some sort of black privilege?
As Chris Rock once said,
None of ya would change places with me! And I'm rich! That's how good it is to be white!
These arguments remind me of growing up a white kid in the deep south when other kids would remark on perceived "reverse racism", saying things like, "BET? I bet if we had a WET that would be racist!" and I would think to myself, "aren't all the other channels already WET?"
Speculating on the level of outrage among black people and invoking the twin specters of Jackson and Sharpton plays well to a certain segment obviously, it's done thousands of times a day in Internet forums. What you're choosing to ignore is the context--the simple fact is that there is no history in the United States of black mobs lynching white people. If it were a staged lynching of two black men by a white mob, there wouldn't be any sort of juxtaposition as those things actually happened, making it more akin to a re-enactment.
“The purpose of this performance was to bring to light social injustices and the issue of inequality that impacts me and my community as a whole,” Edwards said.