It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Onslaught2996
reply to post by muzzleflash
I will never understand the coward mentality that a lot of you Zimmerman supporters have.
To kill someone because they have struck you is insane. America the land of the afraid and cowardly.
Zimmerman was getting an ass kicking..and for that he decided to kill someone. Pathetic. Let that coward run and hide for the rest of his life...he sounds like he is good at it. Hide behind your guns, they can only protect you for so long. What are you plans if ever disarmed or without weapons?...curl up in a ball and cry.. Don't say it would never happen, because it does happen to every people all over the world but unlike Americans..it is not game over for them if caught without a weapon.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
So you deny that fists = killer weapons?
People should take a beating?
Do you realize how brainwashed this sounds?
I don't care about Zimmerman BTW.
I just care about my personal rights and the law.
And educating the ignorant about what their rights are since obviously they don't have a clue.
Originally posted by Onslaught2996
I for one would love to hear what these Zimmerman supporters would do if ever followed by a stranger? Oh wait cowards wouldn't do anything.
Originally posted by Onslaught2996
Point to where I said fists cannot kill you? The law is stupid..it was made by cowards for cowards.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Why do people think that taking a beating is acceptable?
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Everyone has a right to walk in public property as they please.
Originally posted by Onslaught2996
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Why do people think that taking a beating is acceptable?
Where do we say this..we are assuming that people are prepared if ever caught without a weapon. If Zimmerman was unable to defend himself, maybe don't follow the kid.
Why would any reasonable person put themselves in a situation they are not ready for?
Originally posted by Onslaught2996
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Why do people think that taking a beating is acceptable?
Where do we say this..we are assuming that people are prepared if ever caught without a weapon. If Zimmerman was unable to defend himself, maybe don't follow the kid.
Why would any reasonable person put themselves in a situation they are not ready for?
Originally posted by LeaderOfProgress
I will make this real clear so as to make it easy for the brute mentallity people to understand.
If you intend to assault, woop, hit, fight, beat, thump, roll, or any other form of physical aggression, no matter if they are capable of defending themselves without leathal force or not, YOU ARE PUTTING YOUR LIFE ON THE LINE.
People DO NOT have to tolerate any acts of physical aggresion towards them.
Violence should only be in response to violence commited upon oneself or others around them. If everyone lived this way then there would be NO violence...
Originally posted by hypervigilant
Zimmerman was stalking the kid and wanting to kill him for sport.. If he hadn't had the gun he wouldn't have had the balls to be doing what he was doing... Why didn't he just ask him where he was going or if he was lost and needed help unless he was hunting him down like an animal?
Originally posted by muzzleflash
He did defend himself, his assailant is dead.
(Notice even You admit Z was Defending? Freudian Slip??)
He was obviously plenty ready for it, he came out alive didn't he?
He probably wasn't ready for the political and legal fallout though!edit on 15-7-2013 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Onslaught2996
Originally posted by muzzleflash
He did defend himself, his assailant is dead.
(Notice even You admit Z was Defending? Freudian Slip??)
He was obviously plenty ready for it, he came out alive didn't he?
He probably wasn't ready for the political and legal fallout though!edit on 15-7-2013 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)
So he was ready to kill some kid he never met for something the kid never did. Martins past had nothing to do with what happened that night because Zimmerman did not know anything about him.
So basically Zimmerman took a gun into a situation he instigated. Is this not murder.
Originally posted by LeaderOfProgress
I will make this real clear so as to make it easy for the brute mentallity people to understand.
If you intend to assault, woop, hit, fight, beat, thump, roll, or any other form of physical aggression, no matter if they are capable of defending themselves without leathal force or not, YOU ARE PUTTING YOUR LIFE ON THE LINE.
People DO NOT have to tolerate any acts of physical aggresion towards them.
Violence should only be in response to violence commited upon oneself or others around them. If everyone lived this way then there would be NO violence...