It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't know if such a thing existed as such, meaning what we see today as the Talmud. There would have been an oral tradition within the priesthood, in ancient times concerning the details of how rites were performed. There would have also been legends and lore as stories told about the exploits of national heros. Those things show up in the written word that we call the Old Testament. The Talmud is something else where the experts in the law would make decisions about how they apply to real-world circumstances, and it probably began when those experts were deported from the land of Canaan, to Babylon, and they had no temple. The same old methodology got a further impetus with the destruction of Herod's temple, and was at that time written down, to preserve them, since they could not find a clear consensus to leave in a single tradition, and felt the need to record the dissenting views also.
In the first place the Talmud/ Mishnah /Oral law existed in it's many forms before Christ in one form or another . The Talmud is the manifestation of Oral Law is it not .
I have no idea where you got that from unless it is from your cult that has Jewish teachers in it to subvert the member's belief in Christianity.
The synagogue of Satan referred to the sinful Pharisees who were not of the lineage of Aaron as they were supposed to be .They were not up to standards and Jesus knew it
The Free Grace cult is a fact and you can look it up in Wikipedia and see how the theory was developed over time and got its final version in the 1890's.
Your free grace cult argument is your calling card
Were you going to make a point with that bit of knowledge?
Again John 15 tells you all about being grafted into the vine and your not bringing forth fruit
Would you care to quote any of the pertinent text?
The Covenant with the Jews involve sacrifice for sin
You are again only reciting your cult's propaganda. The Law demanded obedience, period, and if you read the story, people who broke it met a nasty end.
The 10 commandments define sin . The Law is a Jewish recompense for having sinned . Which could really never be kept completely.
God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son
Jesus died for our sins . John 3:16 .
I remember that the Old Testament version does not go like that. Your cult has added the parts that you are emphasizing. It does not say that God prefered blood sacrifices. If you read the Greek version, it says that Able gave his best, while Cain did not, giving the stuff that he did not really want himself.
I suppose you remember Cain and Able and the two sacrifices or offerings to God for thanksgiving for prosperity . God favored the sacrifice of the lamb with out blemish and did not favor the veggies Cain offered . God decided he favored blood sacrifices
Some people turn it into a business transaction where Jesus' blood is a form of spiritual money that people can use to "pay for" sins with.
Jesus was not taken and killed . He gave his life freely and his blood was spilled for all man kind . Some instead spit on his gesture of Grace and Mercy and others receive it with thankfulness
It is significant that those "other" religions no longer exist.
And if Jesus is to hold that #1 spot in our lives, why do no other religions mention him or his importance?
I think that this "second coming" was a later invention, where certain second century Christian writers could not get over the Jewish belief that there was going to be this great Day of the Lord where the "nations" were going to be judged for not believing in the Old Testament god.
If we are all to expect a second coming, and have been warned not to be deceived by false prophets, how then are we to know the real one, or what the real truth is?
Are you sure you didn't convert to Judaism or more likely Islam ?
And it makes me question why so many don't seem to care that so much of his life story is missing.....
How do we explain the similarities that are found across so many other religions?
Almost all modern post Christian religions mention Jesus in some capacity or other. Commonly, as a wise man, frequently as an Ascended Master, or other such greater than the average human sort of character.
And if Jesus is to hold that #1 spot in our lives, why do no other religions mention him or his importance?
That's part of being in a cult, that you are convinced by the cult leader that what you are being given to believe in is what makes you a "real" Christian. All the while, you are blinded to the fact that the majority of Christians, the normal Christians, believe in none of it.
You need to get outside your cult's mind bubble and talk to non-cult members to get a reality check.
You believe in a modern theological invention, not in what the Bible really says.
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by AfterInfinity
God knows we fear death and it would be a better incentive to not sin than donate a veggie for your sin . Even though you were supposed to sacrifice your best lamb the Jews started selling sacrificial lambs and such at the alter that probably was not with out blemish and had no attachment to . The Jewish sacrifices became an abomination to God and they went right back to their sin . This is why God gave the Gospel of Jesus to the Gentile to serve him .
It does, if you put it into the right context, which takes some work, to understand it the way it was written.
That doesn't make it any more accurate or real.