It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by firemonkey
We don't know who started the fight, so the "self defense" argument is out the window.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by firemonkey
We don't know who started the fight, so the "self defense" argument is out the window.
Um ... no.
We don't know who started the fight. THat person is the 'perp'.
That has nothing to do with the self defense aspect ... when Zimmerman shot Martin, who was on top of him and was pounding into him. THAT is self defense. No question.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
How do you turn a 15 minute walk to a store into an hour long walk through a neighborhood and end up past theplace you were staying?
Originally posted by firemonkey
reply to post by seabag
1) Where is the evidence that Trayvon initiated the attack? If Zimmerman started the confrontation, then it doesn't matter if he is getting his butt kicked, Trayvon has a right to defend himself as well.
2) I swear, have people not been in fights before? Those are not serious injuries...no matter who much people try to sensationalize it...those are not serious injuries at all.
So, where is the proof?
Originally posted by firemonkey
reply to post by FlyersFan
What we DO know ..... Zimmerman shot Martin when Martin was on top of him, beating the stuff'n out of him. Eyewitness and forensic evidence say this is a fact. Zimmerman was in his legal rights to defend himself in this manner.
Not if he started the fight, which you already admitted we don't know who started the fight. Starting the fight doesn't have to be throwing the first punch...it can be as little as grabbing someone's arm, or putting your hand on someone's chest to attempt to hold them back.
We don't know who started the fight, so the "self defense" argument is out the window.
Originally posted by ButterCookie
the medical evidence that Trayon was NEVER attacked.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Cheesefleas
They both had every right to walk around that neighborhood. My point was it’s not illegal to follow someone and report suspicious activity! That’s what GZ was there to do as a neighborhood watchman!! People who think GZ was a predator should consider that, statistically, people who have a concealed handgun license are FAR LESS LIKELY to commit any crime than the average citizen. These are people who have gone through training on the appropriate use of deadly force and have had extensive backgrounds checks.
He killed a person with his gun because he was attacked and his gun was about to be used against him.
TM – “You’re gonna die tonight!!”
A vigilante (/ˌvɪdʒɪˈlænti/, /ˌvɪdʒɪˈlænteɪ/; Spanish: [bixiˈlante]; Portuguese: [viʒiˈlɐ̃t(ɨ)], [viʒiˈlɐ̃tʃi]) is an individual or group who undertakes law enforcement without legal authority or illegal authority.[1]
Originally posted by Kernel Korn
Was Mr Zimmerman able to remain in his vehicle and keep an eye on Mr Martin?
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by Cheesefleas
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by Cheesefleas
you obviously have no clue.
the 911 audio tapes. Have you listened to them? have you followed the trial from day one?
I have.
I especially like the part where GZ is advised to let police take over.
That is where he went from being a neighborhood watchman, to a vigalante.
He made a choice, and he is responsible for that gun going off.
You've made up your mind and you're not going to let the facts detract from your opinion.
It's pointless to try and explain it to you further.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
How do you turn a 15 minute walk to a store into an hour long walk through a neighborhood and end up past theplace you were staying?
And my question .... a 15 minute walk to the store .... and the father - Tracy 'Juice" Martin - didn't know his son was missing until the next morning? He didn't even notice? I guess his 'mistress' was keeping him too busy to notice that his teenage son wasn't in the house.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
TV NEWS REPORTING ..... the jury is working through lunch.
I would imagine lunch is being brought in and they are eating while they work.
(I kinda' figured they would)
Originally posted by Cheesefleas
He killed a person with his gun because he was acting like a vigilante
A vigilante (/ˌvɪdʒɪˈlænti/, /ˌvɪdʒɪˈlænteɪ/; Spanish: [bixiˈlante]; Portuguese: [viʒiˈlɐ̃t(ɨ)], [viʒiˈlɐ̃tʃi]) is an individual or group who undertakes law enforcement without legal authority or illegal authority.[1]
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by Cheesefleas
Where is the evidence he went vigilante? what evidence points to that? what hard evidence (Not speculation, not conjecture, not a theory.) but hard evidence... not guesses.