It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mrkeen
I heard that glass does not decay so fast. So we need to find at least one ancient glass bottle before we can assume that there was a highly developed ancient civilization.
Originally posted by mrkeen
Also a highly developed civilization means population growth. And lots of people means mass production and lots of garbage. Did anybody ever find an ancient garbage heap?
Originally posted by ABeing
Considering that our standard paradigm includes that Mankind, in this shape and form that we currently embody appeared about 200,000 years ago
For example; let us imagine that we were to create a civilization, that would prosper in peace and longevity, based upon the knowledge that we have available today.
Which material would we use to construct our buildings?
I haven't done much research into limestone yet, but it commonly consists of calcite, which appear to have some rather interesting properties to it and I would guess that the ancients used limestone specifically for one, or various reasons in construction, which we may or may not have figured out yet.
In other words; one could question whether or not we are actually more intelligent in our approach to life now than the ancients were in regards to this point specifically.
If I am not mistaken, it wasn't until about 6,000 years ago that the first domisticated animals and genetically "altetered" plants appeared and we incorporated them into our way of life. Perhaps, if there existed a more advanced and sophisticated civilization before that, they had already realized that the Earth provides all the nutrition we need and have been from the very beginning.
If one is interested in such topics as ancient, perhaps lost civilizations, I would recommend that one do some research, specifically surrounding the myths, legends and recorded history of the following sites:
(list follows)
So, my answer is; yes, remains of our civilization could survive and be uncovered and discovered after thousands, perhaps even millions of years
Originally posted by ABeing
Considering that our standard paradigm includes that Mankind, in this shape and form that we currently embody appeared about 200,000 years ago
Originally posted by Byrd
..actually, depending on if you mean h. sapiens or h. erectus or Australopithecus, the figure is closer to 2 million years. Erectus was fairly similar to modern h. sapiens and close to archaic h.sapiens in size and form. All were capable of language and tools and had organized societies.
Originally posted by ABeing
For example; let us imagine that we were to create a civilization, that would prosper in peace and longevity, based upon the knowledge that we have available today.
Originally posted by Byrd
But remember, materials of today had to be built on thousands of years of other technology. You don't fall out of the trees and the next day build high tech blast furnaces and machines capable of printing 3-D parts out of plastic.
Originally posted by ABeing
I haven't done much research into limestone yet, but it commonly consists of calcite, which appear to have some rather interesting properties to it and I would guess that the ancients used limestone specifically for one, or various reasons in construction, which we may or may not have figured out yet.
Originally posted by Byrd
It was plentiful and it's a fairly soft stone that you can actually carve with low tech tools (you can scratch it with your fingernail.) It does, however, erode far more quickly than granite does.
Originally posted by ABeing
If I am not mistaken, it wasn't until about 6,000 years ago that the first domisticated animals and genetically "altetered" plants appeared and we incorporated them into our way of life. Perhaps, if there existed a more advanced and sophisticated civilization before that, they had already realized that the Earth provides all the nutrition we need and have been from the very beginning.
Originally posted by Byrd
Dogs were domesticated around 30,000 years ago.
Originally posted by ABeing
If one is interested in such topics as ancient, perhaps lost civilizations, I would recommend that one do some research, specifically surrounding the myths, legends and recorded history of the following sites:
(list follows)
Originally posted by Byrd
Interesting places and much discussed here -- sadly for your list, the time frames go from 7,000 BC (still not the oldest sites we have) up to 1500 AD (only 500 years ago.) Some of them (Lemuria) were debunked long ago (Lemuria was proposed in the 1800's to explain the distribution of lemurs and once better mapping and geology tools emerged, was quickly debunked. However, the psychics had fallen in love with the idea and kept channeling "ancient lives" from this place that actually never existed.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
like the Dogon tribe of Africa they knew the Sirius system to be a binary star system 'HOW',
Originally posted by LABTECH767
In many ancient ruins smooth ground lenses made of ruby and sapphire have been found and it is now believed they may been used in early telescope's long before they were supposedly invented.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
China had a very great wealth of information, maybe even more than the great library of Alexandria but along came emperor chin after whom we call it china, now he had ALL scholars and historians put to death except the doctor's and astrologer's thereby cementing his place as the first emperor of all china (Who was he writing out of history, hmm.) and though it is very problematic to the classical view of Chinese history when they were excavating the terracotta army they came across the almost perfect remains of a sword that the looters whom deposed the chin dynasty after his death missed when the raided his tomb for weapon's, it had lost the handle to the damp soil but the blade was coated in a micron thin layer of chromium and was sharp enough to cut a silk handkerchief after being in the ground for over two thousand year's, undoubtedly knowledge that was lost in chin's purges.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
The Indian Mahabharata lists tales of great empire's and a war between the rama (India and surrounds) empire and the Atala (the white isle at the navel of the world possibly Antarctica) empire,
The Kurukshetra War was, according to the Indian epic poem Mahābhārata, a conflict that arose from a dynastic succession struggle between two groups of North Western Indian Kingdoms called Kuru, the Kauravs and Pandavs, for the throne of Hastinapura. It involved a number of ancient kingdoms participating as allies of the rival groups.They called themselves Aryan, which initially started as an ethical term for nobility in the Indian Subcontinent, but was later used to represent a race by many western Indologists.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
the Indian's had flying vehicle's simply called chariot's but with different name's for each class (Vimana means set apart and refers to the holy sanctuary in a temple - but to fly is to be set apart) and the Atalan had the velixi that were said to be superior to the Raman vehicles but a terrible war destroyed the atala and the raman survived, it also talks of a weapon called an iron thunderbolt that explodes with the light of ten thousand sun's a great fire and wind, poisons the air food and water, caused teeth and hair to fall out and the army of the indian deity that used it had to wash themselves and there equipment in the water of a river.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
As for the lenses,
www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk...
(Think I will leave the epic of Gilgamesh out of this one and the ranks of shining silver chariots that battle in the sky from the ninevan cuneiform clay scrolls and tablet's)
Originally posted by LABTECH767
The Vimanika Shaestrum (sorry for the spelling, please anyone correct it) Is, I believe the book that best describles the flying Vimana but though like yourself I am a Christian I do believe there is room for a much older earth than pure doctrinal creationism would allow and after all it was christ whom said there is nothing new under the sun.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
Remember the Mahabharata was traditionally past down not by text but by perfectly recited linguistic tradition and when it was translated into English in the late 1800's it contained such information as to how to build a flying chariot, "It's body must be stiff and wing's must not flap, the whirlwind must be placed at the front with the mercury engine to fire it the furnace heating the mercury to drive the whirlwind (sounds like a cross between a heat exchange gas powered drive system and a by plane to me) this was one vimana and not a flying saucer,.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
And you know as well as I that the true origin of any Nazi disc technology (though I doubt they had it or if they did could not replicate it) comes from the battle over Nuremburg in 1560 AD. and probable Nazi excavation of the downed craft.
Originally posted by LABTECH767
Were the veilixi are concerned I heard that from another source and as I am not reader of Sanskrit can not comment in any worthy fashion or support the sources I read it from. My hat is off to you heart but please reconsider your opinion on the lenses and there are much older rock murals that MAY be of dogon tradition that show Sirius as a binary star though they were probably exposed to earlier missionary's whom may have past it on to them.edit on 22-4-2013 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)