It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Everything within space is restricted by the speed of light," explained Richard Obousy, president of Icarus Interstellar, a non-profit group of scientists and engineers devoted to pursuing interstellar spaceflight. "But the really cool thing is space-time, the fabric of space, is not limited by the speed of light."
Originally posted by Tajlakz
So what is it about the vacuum that makes 'c' c? What slows light down to that value in the absence of matter?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by Diablos
Unfortunately, no. This is because individual particles don't necessarily have a temperature. Temperature itself is an emergent phenomena that results from the interactions of many particles.
Maxwell and Boltzmann would like a word with you.
Omitting the internal energy of the particle (qm states) which will be dwarfed by the kinetic term at relativistic speeds, yes you can calculate a temperature given an average kinetic energy of incoming particles.
Originally posted by XLR8R
reply to post by Astyanax
Well, some suggested that gravitation and magnetism is one of the same.
So if we can build a ship that can produce it own artificial gravitating magnetic field we could circumvent pretty much anything. Like cosmic radiation, other magnetic fields like those of planets.
Some would say atmospheres would mean nothing. We would just fly right through with out any excess heat. And since the ship has it's own magnetic/gravitational field we would not feel G-forces. We could stop and go as fast as the field could handle.
Originally posted by Oannes
Tapping the zero-point would yield unlimited output. It is an inexhaustable sea of energy.
There are particles all around us. Outerspace would serve as the perfect reaction chamber. The amount of zero-point energy in the area of a tea cup, could boil all of the Earth's oceans. This is a simple, yet awesome power source. And yes, this technology has been suppressed. Look up Henry T. Moray. He was shot at on the street for discovering this secret.
Originally posted by Tajlakz
reply to post by mbkennel
I know you didn't reply to bedlam's post about altering the permittivity and permeability of space around a craft, but since you are a physicist, I was wondering if I could get your opinion about his assertions. Do you have any idea how what he is describing would be possible?
and how it is related to ernst mach?
Einstein—before completing his development of the general theory of relativity—found an effect which he interpreted as being evidence of Mach's principle. We assume a fixed background for conceptual simplicity, construct a large spherical shell of mass, and set it spinning in that background. The reference frame in the interior of this shell will precess with respect to the fixed background. This effect is known as the Lense–Thirring effect. Einstein was so satisfied with this manifestation of Mach's principle that he wrote a letter to Mach expressing this:
it... turns out that inertia originates in a kind of interaction between bodies, quite in the sense of your considerations on Newton's pail experiment... If one rotates [a heavy shell of matter] relative to the fixed stars about an axis going through its center, a Coriolis force arises in the interior of the shell; that is, the plane of a Foucault pendulum is dragged around (with a practically unmeasurably small angular velocity).
—[5]
The Lense–Thirring effect certainly satisfies the very basic and broad notion that "matter there influences inertia here"[7] The plane of the pendulum would not be dragged around if the shell of matter were not present, or if it were not spinning. As for the statement that "inertia originates in a kind of interaction between bodies", this too could be interpreted as true in the context of the effect.
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by mbkennel
At relativistic velocities, incoming radio waves will shift into hard gammas, and I bet they'd heat that thing up just fine.
Originally posted by mbkennel
In vacuum, no idea.
Space itself doesn't have permittivity and permeability, in proper theoretical units they are "1". and B=H and E=D.
Permittivity and permeability are properties of bulk matter interacting electromagnetically with EM fields with wavelengths substantially longer than atomic space scales. Free space EM fields come in, interact with the charged atoms, which respond statically and (at high enough frequencies) dynamically, creating their own electromagnetic fields. The combination of the two can be represented as effective parameters in classical E&M changing magnetic and electric propagation. The "force" and "response" in essence.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Is vacuum dispersive?
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Bedlam
So you are saying space is non-dispersive, so all wavelengths are equal?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by mbkennel
In vacuum, no idea.
Space itself doesn't have permittivity and permeability, in proper theoretical units they are "1". and B=H and E=D.
epsilon0 and mu0 (can't do the symbols on a phone) would like a word with you
Permittivity and permeability are properties of bulk matter interacting electromagnetically with EM fields with wavelengths substantially longer than atomic space scales. Free space EM fields come in, interact with the charged atoms, which respond statically and (at high enough frequencies) dynamically, creating their own electromagnetic fields. The combination of the two can be represented as effective parameters in classical E&M changing magnetic and electric propagation. The "force" and "response" in essence.
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by ImaFungi
In terms of velocity of propagation, not wavelength.