Giant sonic boom felt and heard in Indianapolis Indiana(meteor? mass devastation Info blocade

Originally posted by HIWATT

Originally posted by usaman1983
I remember a couple of years ago a similar neighborhood explosion in San Francisco suburb and it was caused by gas line explosion and days/weeks leading up to the explosion of gas smells in the area and gas company trucks in the neighborhood as well.....

www.nytimes.com...

But so far there has been no reports of gas smells and no gas leaks found in the Indianapolis explosion as far as I could read...,

Actually, if you've read the entire thread, there have been live reports from members here who live in that area, of smelling rotten eggs.

The gas utility for that area specifically states that a leak will smell like rotten eggs

I have read the whole thread...and note that the utility company have stated it was not a gas explosion..nor have any other authorities....unless Ive missed that post and perhaps you could point it out to me...thanks....oh and perhaps address my point about the photographs posted that show the trees undamaged, not from the pic you posted but from those just after the event..

Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by HIWATT

 

Yes that tree has burn damage...caused by the fire that actually took place in that photograph you published. There is no evidence that the fire in your pic was primary to a gas blast happening.. As a matter of fact the word "Gas" is absent from all reports and has been denied by the utility company....but...you still havnt addressed the pics I posted that show the trees undamaged while all else around them is in pieces....

1. I never said that the fire damage to the tree had anything to do with gas. Just fire.

2. I haven't seen any link/report where CEG has denied any leaks.

3. I did respond to the fact the trees were undamaged (possibly to another members post however):

It's pretty simple.

Wood used to make a house is dead, and dry.

Wood from a living tree is moist.

Trees also have roots.

Houses don't.

When a house EXPLODES, the DEAD DRY wood will CATCH FIRE

A tree, by contrast, which is still alive, is moist, and is rooted in the ground via a main trunk that is fairly flexible -- is much more immune to the same kind of damage.

Originally posted by HIWATT

Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by HIWATT

 

Yes that tree has burn damage...caused by the fire that actually took place in that photograph you published. There is no evidence that the fire in your pic was primary to a gas blast happening.. As a matter of fact the word "Gas" is absent from all reports and has been denied by the utility company....but...you still havnt addressed the pics I posted that show the trees undamaged while all else around them is in pieces....

1. I never said that the fire damage to the tree had anything to do with gas. Just fire.

2. I haven't seen any link/report where CEG has denied any leaks.

3. I did respond to the fact the trees were undamaged (possibly to another members post however):

It's pretty simple.

Wood used to make a house is dead, and dry.

Wood from a living tree is moist.

Trees also have roots.

Houses don't.

When a house EXPLODES, the DEAD DRY wood will CATCH FIRE

A tree, by contrast, which is still alive, is moist, and is rooted in the ground via a main trunk that is fairly flexible -- is much more immune to the same kind of damage.

here are 2 different angles..look at the trees...

reply to post by truthinfact


Sad to think that people are humiliated at airports - 'for their protection', yet we can't seem to shut-down a residential meth-lab that is so huge, it shakes houses dozens of miles away...

It just seems like a meth-lab, the size required to produce such a devistating explosion, would be easy to spot... the products and tools used to create that stuff are pretty obvious... not to mention the bi-products produced during the manufacture... the smell, etc...

It is probably as good as any idea, but I just can't see that being the cause... if it were the cause, then - aside from the lives lost, the injuries, and destruction of family homes - I am glad it exploded and relieved us all from one less criminal, who is helping to destroy our friends' and families' lives.

reply to post by captiva



See my response directly under your last.

With regards to CEG either confirming or denying there was a gas leak, I have not seen a link/report of that.

If you have one please share it.

reply to post by HIWATT


Yeah, I just read about her, and how she's cointelpro and a disinfo agent. Makes sense. I looked on the Russian site she links to and nowhere does it talk about anything like what she says. How would she know what goes on at the Kremlin?

reply to post by Maskander


So.... you are trying to say that there was a crater there during the night but once daylight came, the crater had disappeared??

I dont think so....

But I gotta say that the blast is a huge one!

I doubt that its a car bomb either.... why blow some car up in a quiet street? You'd want to cause as much harm as possible like they do in Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria

reply to post by Violater1


A bit after I posted the possibility, they ruled it out and confirmed a gas leak.

Not a bad idea, but no cigar as it turns out.

reply to post by HIWATT


Do you have one confirming there are leaks?

I mean if you don't then we can rule out gas leaks.

reply to post by dangerish


You do realize the smell they add to natural gas to warn you of it's presence is sulfur dioxide right? Which smells like what? That's right, rotten eggs chief.

Saying it didn't smell like rotten eggs as an argument against a gas blast is ridiculous.

Originally posted by baddmove

Originally posted by HIWATT

Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by HIWATT

 

Yes that tree has burn damage...caused by the fire that actually took place in that photograph you published. There is no evidence that the fire in your pic was primary to a gas blast happening.. As a matter of fact the word "Gas" is absent from all reports and has been denied by the utility company....but...you still havnt addressed the pics I posted that show the trees undamaged while all else around them is in pieces....

1. I never said that the fire damage to the tree had anything to do with gas. Just fire.

2. I haven't seen any link/report where CEG has denied any leaks.

3. I did respond to the fact the trees were undamaged (possibly to another members post however):

It's pretty simple.

Wood used to make a house is dead, and dry.

Wood from a living tree is moist.

Trees also have roots.

Houses don't.

When a house EXPLODES, the DEAD DRY wood will CATCH FIRE

A tree, by contrast, which is still alive, is moist, and is rooted in the ground via a main trunk that is fairly flexible -- is much more immune to the same kind of damage.

here are 2 different angles..look at the trees...

edit on 11-11-2012 by baddmove because: (no reason given)

I see them. What point are you making?

I also see green grass beyond the immediate blast/burn zone.

That area is also littered with unburnt wood left over from the homes which blew out during the blast.

Not sure what is so hard to understand here. There was a blast, then a fire. 2 homes exploded. Some trees which were partially burnt survived.

??

reply to post by baddmove


The outline of the charred area, spanning the length of several houses, reminds me of Flight 93 and the gash in the ground it allegedly caused. The debris offers no proof against the idea, since there was similar debris at the site of Flight 93.

I do wonder if a plane may have been flying straight down when it hit the ground... the char pattern certainly does look like the shape of a fuselage and the wings.

Hitting nose first, between the 2 completely destroyed homes, the wings would have impacted the homes on either side and maybe produced the patter we see there... just speculation on my part, no way to prove it as true though.