It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by Alchemst7
I've been to the site this year...actually couple of months ago...there is no real proof that this is a pyramid. Out of all things the best case for it is the shape of the "hill". Somebody mentioned already, there are a lot of hills that have pyramid shapes. This is not out of the ordinary.
Tunnels are questionable. Osmanagic's team is practically "inventing" the tunnels as they dig. I've been to those tunnels. After visiting, you are left with a suspicious feeling that they are making the tunnels, not excavating old ones.
There are some stone slabs that kind a look like they are man made, but it's not definite. They could be a natural formation.
No entry is found to the alleged pyramids, and no chambers of any kind.
I'm not claiming they are not, but I've seen no concrete proof that those are really pyramids. And I've been there. Sure I'm not an expert, but there were no signs of anything artificial out there.
Everything else you've maybe red or heard is speculation, without no real scientific data.
Originally posted by randomname
no, that puts the leaf carbon dated 25,000 years.
just like if i scraped some of that organic leaf matter and put it on a '74 buick , it wouldn't make that buick 25,000 years old.
Originally posted by dogstar23
Originally posted by butcherguy
All one needs to do is go to the search function on ATS and pull up the numerous threads about the 'pyramid'/ 'pyramids' and read a couple of them.
It has been shown repeatedly to be naturally occurring mountains that are there, and the people pushing the scam that it is a man made pyramid have been shown to be frauds numerous times.
Or, you can just read the Wikipedia page for Bosnian Pyramids , that will explain things very well.
Ludicrous post.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by butcherguy
Nothing has ever been debunked regarding the pyramids. The debunking is just someone posts or opinons or the economic interests of a few partisan egyptian experts, while real scientists have already carbon dated artifects found within the ancient structure.
I would urge the 'pyramid' believers to hit the link that you posted.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by butcherguy
Nothing has ever been debunked regarding the pyramids. The debunking is just someone posts or opinons or the economic interests of a few partisan egyptian experts, while real scientists have already carbon dated artifects found within the ancient structure.
The problem is that Osmie and friends cannot provide evidence that it IS a pyramid nor of the culture that would have produced it, if you believe it was 'built' can you point to the quarries?
A link to one of the real ruins at the site
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by Alchemst7
I've been to the site this year...actually couple of months ago...there is no real proof that this is a pyramid. Out of all things the best case for it is the shape of the "hill". Somebody mentioned already, there are a lot of hills that have pyramid shapes. This is not out of the ordinary.
Tunnels are questionable. Osmanagic's team is practically "inventing" the tunnels as they dig. I've been to those tunnels. After visiting, you are left with a suspicious feeling that they are making the tunnels, not excavating old ones.
There are some stone slabs that kind a look like they are man made, but it's not definite. They could be a natural formation.
No entry is found to the alleged pyramids, and no chambers of any kind.
I'm not claiming they are not, but I've seen no concrete proof that those are really pyramids. And I've been there. Sure I'm not an expert, but there were no signs of anything artificial out there.
Everything else you've maybe red or heard is speculation, without no real scientific data.
Pics or it didn't happen. You went all the way there and didn't take any pics?
These are enough to convince me, obviously not artificial:
I dunno, the stone slabs in that last picture look as if cast from some sort of ballast concrete
Originally posted by Fineousstitch
www.missiontoamerica.com...
The world is only 6 thousand yrs old. see link for proof
So there is no way that leaf could be 25000 years old