It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by talklikeapirat
reply to post by bjarneorn
Thinking the idea, to explode a nuclear bomb over a sovereign country to destroy its infrastructure and believing there wont be severe consequences, is nuts, is now nuts? Interesting.
But as we've learned, Israel has no nukes it could use, so only your other two options are left.
Full weapons systems? Missiles and everything? I'm guessing they don't, but a guess is all it is. Here's why I think that way. Let's assume Iran is seeking such weapons. Why are they? If it's to show the world that they can't be messed with, I would think they'd announce that the instant they had them. If it's to destroy Israel, I'd think they'd do it now, before there was a chance they were attacked first. But all this, again, is just my guess.
Don't you think they already have some nukes - bought from some other sources?
I agree completely, but there are two problems. One, "Very reliable." What does that mean? The press tells us (if you believe them) that the Bin Laden raid was launched with less than a 60% chance he was there. Two, intelligence on a top secret operation, in a country with a security force all over, is tough to get on the ground. You have to rely on imaging and intercepts, and sensors.
There should be very reliable intelligence before heavy weapons are used and wars started possibly involving whole continents.
Respectfully, I think that's the wrong question. The question should be "Is Israel sure they can catch a rocket?" Unfortunately the answer is no, they can't be sure. I could be wildly wrong, but I thought their success ration currently was 6 or 7 out of 10. If we're talking about nukes, I don't like those odds.
Besides, Israeli tech is tops. Are you sure they cannot catch a nuke rocket as it is being launched or afterwards?
Depends on what you're looking for. You get into classified territory pretty quickly in that field.
Is there anybody here who has that kind of knowledge about modern weaponry?
Originally posted by Bluesma
How reliable is this news?
Now, correct me if I am wrong, but would it not be dangerous for EVERYONE in the region if an EMP strike happened there, especially because of nuclear facilities??? Don't nuclear facilities NEED electricity to keep running and keep radiation contained?
Please excuse my naivité, I admit I am very ignorant of the full situation, I don't know what it is Iran has exactly, and welcome correction and education on the matter. But this just sounds like
a very bad idea......edit on 10-9-2012 by Bluesma because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ZakOlongapo
..people with a bit of working brain in the head know what is the f#####g problem here, illegal state of Izrahell on Palestinian land... just cos they owned almost all U believe in, they can do and say things.... F### us.
is there way to fight this nonsense? no! there have to be WW3, U all know that...
Originally posted by ALF88
Somebody has to stop these Zionist nutjobs Netanjahu and Barak.
The pulse can easily span continent-sized areas, and this radiation can affect systems on land, sea, and air. The first recorded EMP incident accompanied a high-altitude nuclear test over the South Pacific and resulted in power system failures as far away as Hawaii. A large device detonated at 400�500 km over Kansas would affect all of CONUS. The signal from such an event extends to the visual horizon as seen from the burst point.
Originally posted by HumanitiesLastHope
reply to post by ALF88
did you forget good ole ahmadinajad once to wipe em off the map,
to me.
Originally posted by WeRpeons
reply to post by ALF88
I found this bit of information about how wide of an area an EMP nuclear weapon can affect.
The pulse can easily span continent-sized areas, and this radiation can affect systems on land, sea, and air. The first recorded EMP incident accompanied a high-altitude nuclear test over the South Pacific and resulted in power system failures as far away as Hawaii. A large device detonated at 400�500 km over Kansas would affect all of CONUS. The signal from such an event extends to the visual horizon as seen from the burst point.
I would think if they used such a weapon, they would be affecting more than just the country of Iran. It could backfire and Israel may end up having to defend itself from neighboring countries.