It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by Biliverdin
Homosexuals are not allowed marriage because it is against the law.
Not anything to do with procreating, it is an illegal act, God made it so. God says men and woman are the natural state of man, and anything which is harmful to man or against the natural state of man is illegal.
Originally posted by XaniMatriX
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by RealSpoke
Thats ok... I am currently thinking of moving into the middle of no where very very very far the any man or civilization and just praying this all ends soon.
Neno is right, its time to just back way up.... screw all of society. And all this insanity.edit on 27-7-2012 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)
If you think that way, it doesnt matter where you go, if you see garbage and death and all kind of evil around you, doesnt matter where you are, in the middle of a desert, or a jungle you will see garbage and death and all kind of evil.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Yeah, nature doesn't like women past the age of menopause, or men past the age of virility either. But, we've found a way to cheat nature, and live beyond that.
And I believe that Jesus wouldn't have a problem with two people genuinely loving each other, regardless of their sexual orientation.
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by Biliverdin
Homosexuals are not allowed marriage because it is against the law.
Not anything to do with procreating, it is an illegal act, God made it so. God says men and woman are the natural state of man, and anything which is harmful to man or against the natural state of man is illegal.edit on 27-7-2012 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by Biliverdin
The constraints in marriage to me are the law. I did not explain anything to you, all i did was answer one or two small questions which you directly asked.
That is not explaining the constraints of marriage to you.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Yeah, nature doesn't like women past the age of menopause, or men past the age of virility either. But, we've found a way to cheat nature, and live beyond that.
Why would nature not like them? Is their history and contribution to the gene pool suddenly non-existent?
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
I was doing all right til legitimate children.Now I am wondering how far I can move.edit on 27-7-2012 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Their children would not be legitimate though.
One comment made earlier was marriage to make their children legitimate. Well their children are unable to be legitimate. Legitimacy is conception and birth within the confines of a marriage between a man and his wife. That is what decides legitimacy.
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
spotless has a point... we are just going to leave Muslims out of this one.edit on 27-7-2012 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)
Isn't excluding Muslims sort of like excluding gays?
When is exclusion no longer exclusion?
I would think there would have to be some sort of logical reason to enforce any sort of an exclusion.
That's why I say let the gays have their secular marriages - they can't touch the spiritual ones. It's not people excluding them from those, it's nature itself. Let them rage against nature, and see how well that goes.
That's ridiculous, since when did organised religion have anything to do with what is natural? Calling it 'spiritual' does not make marriage any less of a construct of organised religion.edit on 27-7-2012 by Biliverdin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by quietlearner
I have a question
hopefully someone with knowledge can answer
why are married couples given tax breaks? when was this law made and with what purpose?
I dont really know but I would guess they were made to help in raising a child
if thats true then why would gay marriages be entitled to tax breaks
would it not be akin to rich people demanding financial aid?
Originally posted by nenothtu
Who said anything about "organized religion"? It wasn't me. You've perhaps confused me with someone else. In religious matters, I'm probably the most DISorganized person you will ever have the misfortune to meet.
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by Biliverdin
Men are allowed more than one wife.... If I was young and married then was unable to give birth yes I would find another wife who could bear children for my husband...
what on earth is wrong with that?
You live in the US, there is quite a lot wrong with that, unless you intend to divorce him first.